根据老年急性髓细胞性白血病患者的残余疾病状况,使用氟达拉滨、AraC、G-CSF 和依达比星,或克拉利宾加多诺比星和 AraC 加强治疗:NCRI AML18 试验结果。

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1200/JCO.24.00259
Nigel H Russell, Abin Thomas, Robert K Hills, Ian Thomas, Amanda Gilkes, Nuria Marquez Almuina, Sarah Burns, Lucy Marsh, Paresh Vyas, Marlen Metzner, Nicholas McCarthy, Georgia Andrew, Jennifer Byrne, Rob S Sellar, Richard Kelly, Paul Cahalin, Ulrik Malthe Overgaard, Priyanka Mehta, Mike Dennis, Steven Knapper, Sylvie D Freeman
{"title":"根据老年急性髓细胞性白血病患者的残余疾病状况,使用氟达拉滨、AraC、G-CSF 和依达比星,或克拉利宾加多诺比星和 AraC 加强治疗:NCRI AML18 试验结果。","authors":"Nigel H Russell, Abin Thomas, Robert K Hills, Ian Thomas, Amanda Gilkes, Nuria Marquez Almuina, Sarah Burns, Lucy Marsh, Paresh Vyas, Marlen Metzner, Nicholas McCarthy, Georgia Andrew, Jennifer Byrne, Rob S Sellar, Richard Kelly, Paul Cahalin, Ulrik Malthe Overgaard, Priyanka Mehta, Mike Dennis, Steven Knapper, Sylvie D Freeman","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.00259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the survival benefit of chemotherapy intensification in older patients with AML who have not achieved a measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five hundred twenty-three patients with AML (median age, 67 years; range, 51-79) without a flow cytometric MRD-negative remission response after a first course of daunorubicin and AraC (DA; including 165 not in remission) were randomly assigned between up to two further courses of DA or intensified chemotherapy-either fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and idarubicin (FLAG-Ida) or DA with cladribine (DAC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall survival (OS) was not improved in the intensification arms (DAC <i>v</i> DA: hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.01]; <i>P</i> = .054; FLAG-Ida <i>v</i> DA: HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.66 to 1.12]; <i>P</i> = .270); OS at 3 years was 34%, 46%, and 42% for DA, DAC, and FLAG-Ida, respectively. Early deaths and other adverse events were more frequent with FLAG-Ida (9% day 60 deaths <i>v</i> 4% after DA or DAC; <i>P</i> = .032). Of patients entering random assignment, 131 had MRD unknown status. In this subgroup of patients lacking evidence of residual leukemia by flow cytometry, there was no detectable survival advantage from intensification. A planned sensitivity analysis excluding these patients demonstrated a survival benefit for both DAC (HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.93]; <i>P</i> = .018) and FLAG-Ida (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.98]; <i>P</i> = .035); OS at 3 years was 30%, 46%, and 46% for DA, DAC, and FLAG-Ida, respectively. There was a concordant reduction in relapse (DAC <i>v</i> DA: HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.98]; <i>P</i> = .039; FLAG-Ida <i>v</i> DA: HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.49 to 0.99]; <i>P</i> = .042). DAC benefit was maintained when survival was censored for transplant (<i>P</i> = .042).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study of older patients with AML considered fit and with evidence of residual disease after first induction, chemotherapy intensification improved survival. DAC intensification was better tolerated than FLAG-Ida.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"JCO2400259"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment Intensification With Either Fludarabine, AraC, G-CSF and Idarubicin, or Cladribine Plus Daunorubicin and AraC on the Basis of Residual Disease Status in Older Patients With AML: Results From the NCRI AML18 Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nigel H Russell, Abin Thomas, Robert K Hills, Ian Thomas, Amanda Gilkes, Nuria Marquez Almuina, Sarah Burns, Lucy Marsh, Paresh Vyas, Marlen Metzner, Nicholas McCarthy, Georgia Andrew, Jennifer Byrne, Rob S Sellar, Richard Kelly, Paul Cahalin, Ulrik Malthe Overgaard, Priyanka Mehta, Mike Dennis, Steven Knapper, Sylvie D Freeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO.24.00259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the survival benefit of chemotherapy intensification in older patients with AML who have not achieved a measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five hundred twenty-three patients with AML (median age, 67 years; range, 51-79) without a flow cytometric MRD-negative remission response after a first course of daunorubicin and AraC (DA; including 165 not in remission) were randomly assigned between up to two further courses of DA or intensified chemotherapy-either fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and idarubicin (FLAG-Ida) or DA with cladribine (DAC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall survival (OS) was not improved in the intensification arms (DAC <i>v</i> DA: hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.01]; <i>P</i> = .054; FLAG-Ida <i>v</i> DA: HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.66 to 1.12]; <i>P</i> = .270); OS at 3 years was 34%, 46%, and 42% for DA, DAC, and FLAG-Ida, respectively. Early deaths and other adverse events were more frequent with FLAG-Ida (9% day 60 deaths <i>v</i> 4% after DA or DAC; <i>P</i> = .032). Of patients entering random assignment, 131 had MRD unknown status. In this subgroup of patients lacking evidence of residual leukemia by flow cytometry, there was no detectable survival advantage from intensification. A planned sensitivity analysis excluding these patients demonstrated a survival benefit for both DAC (HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.93]; <i>P</i> = .018) and FLAG-Ida (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.98]; <i>P</i> = .035); OS at 3 years was 30%, 46%, and 46% for DA, DAC, and FLAG-Ida, respectively. There was a concordant reduction in relapse (DAC <i>v</i> DA: HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.98]; <i>P</i> = .039; FLAG-Ida <i>v</i> DA: HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.49 to 0.99]; <i>P</i> = .042). DAC benefit was maintained when survival was censored for transplant (<i>P</i> = .042).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study of older patients with AML considered fit and with evidence of residual disease after first induction, chemotherapy intensification improved survival. DAC intensification was better tolerated than FLAG-Ida.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"JCO2400259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00259\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00259","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估未获得可测量残留疾病(MRD)阴性缓解的老年急性髓细胞性白血病患者加强化疗对生存的益处:研究人员随机分配了523例在接受第一个疗程的达乌鲁比星和AraC(DA,包括165例未缓解的患者)治疗后MRD阴性缓解反应的急性髓细胞性白血病患者(中位年龄67岁,范围51-79岁),让他们继续接受最多两个疗程的DA或强化化疗--氟达拉滨、阿糖胞苷、粒细胞集落刺激因子和依达比星(FLAG-Ida)或DA联合克拉利宾(DAC):结果:强化治疗组的总生存率(OS)没有提高(DAC v DA:危险比[HR],0.74 [95% CI,0.55 至 1.01];P = .054;FLAG-Ida v DA:HR,0.86 [95% CI,0.66 至 1.12];P = .270);DA、DAC 和 FLAG-Ida 3 年的 OS 分别为 34%、46% 和 42%。FLAG-Ida的早期死亡和其他不良事件发生率更高(第60天死亡9%,DA或DAC为4%;P = .032)。在进入随机分配的患者中,131 人的 MRD 状态未知。在流式细胞术未发现残留白血病证据的这一亚组患者中,强化治疗并不能带来明显的生存优势。一项计划中的敏感性分析排除了这些患者,结果显示 DAC(HR,0.66 [95% CI,0.46 至 0.93];P = .018)和 FLAG-Ida(HR,0.72 [95% CI,0.53 至 0.98];P = .035)均有生存获益;DA、DAC 和 FLAG-Ida 3 年的 OS 分别为 30%、46% 和 46%。复发率也相应降低(DAC v DA:HR,0.66 [95% CI,0.45~0.98];P = .039;FLAG-Ida v DA:HR,0.70 [95% CI,0.49~0.99];P = .042)。当对移植后的存活率进行删减时,DAC的获益仍然存在(P = .042):结论:在这项针对老年急性髓细胞性白血病(AML)患者的研究中,首次诱导治疗后有残留疾病证据的患者加强化疗可提高生存率。DAC强化治疗的耐受性优于FLAG-Ida。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment Intensification With Either Fludarabine, AraC, G-CSF and Idarubicin, or Cladribine Plus Daunorubicin and AraC on the Basis of Residual Disease Status in Older Patients With AML: Results From the NCRI AML18 Trial.

Purpose: To evaluate the survival benefit of chemotherapy intensification in older patients with AML who have not achieved a measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remission.

Methods: Five hundred twenty-three patients with AML (median age, 67 years; range, 51-79) without a flow cytometric MRD-negative remission response after a first course of daunorubicin and AraC (DA; including 165 not in remission) were randomly assigned between up to two further courses of DA or intensified chemotherapy-either fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and idarubicin (FLAG-Ida) or DA with cladribine (DAC).

Results: Overall survival (OS) was not improved in the intensification arms (DAC v DA: hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.01]; P = .054; FLAG-Ida v DA: HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.66 to 1.12]; P = .270); OS at 3 years was 34%, 46%, and 42% for DA, DAC, and FLAG-Ida, respectively. Early deaths and other adverse events were more frequent with FLAG-Ida (9% day 60 deaths v 4% after DA or DAC; P = .032). Of patients entering random assignment, 131 had MRD unknown status. In this subgroup of patients lacking evidence of residual leukemia by flow cytometry, there was no detectable survival advantage from intensification. A planned sensitivity analysis excluding these patients demonstrated a survival benefit for both DAC (HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.93]; P = .018) and FLAG-Ida (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.98]; P = .035); OS at 3 years was 30%, 46%, and 46% for DA, DAC, and FLAG-Ida, respectively. There was a concordant reduction in relapse (DAC v DA: HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.98]; P = .039; FLAG-Ida v DA: HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.49 to 0.99]; P = .042). DAC benefit was maintained when survival was censored for transplant (P = .042).

Conclusion: In this study of older patients with AML considered fit and with evidence of residual disease after first induction, chemotherapy intensification improved survival. DAC intensification was better tolerated than FLAG-Ida.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
期刊最新文献
US Food and Drug Administration's Directive to Deal With Delayed Confirmatory Trials: Lessons From Pralatrexate and Belinostat for T-Cell Lymphoma. Improving Access to Patient-Focused, Decentralized Clinical Trials Requires Streamlined Regulatory Requirements: An ASCO Research Statement. First-Line Nivolumab Plus Relatlimab Versus Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma: An Indirect Treatment Comparison Using RELATIVITY-047 and CheckMate 067 Trial Data. A Multicenter Phase II Trial of Ruxolitinib for Treatment of Corticosteroid Refractory Sclerotic Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease. Oxaliplatin Added to Fluoropyrimidine/Bevacizumab as Initial Therapy for Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Older Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Trial (JCOG1018).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1