Bing Xie, Lahari Nandikanti, Carolyn W Swenson, Jing Wu, Tianhang Liu, Xin Yang, Yi Li, Xiuli Sun, John O DeLancey, Luyun Chen, Jianliu Wang
{"title":"基于核磁共振成像的中国和美国白人女性脱垂患者结构失效比较:病例对照研究","authors":"Bing Xie, Lahari Nandikanti, Carolyn W Swenson, Jing Wu, Tianhang Liu, Xin Yang, Yi Li, Xiuli Sun, John O DeLancey, Luyun Chen, Jianliu Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00192-024-05945-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Although some evidence suggests that Chinese and white women might have different pelvic floor anatomy such as levator complex and connective tissue support for pelvic organs, it is unknown if these differences affect the mechanisms of pelvic organ prolapse. We sought to determine whether differences exist in MRI-based structural failure patterns between Chinese and American white women with prolapse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a case-control study in different racial cohorts recruited in China and the USA. The Chinese cohort included 19 women with anterior-predominant prolapse and 24 controls with normal pelvic support. The American white cohort included 30 women with anterior-predominant prolapse and 30 controls. Both cohorts underwent the same clinical evaluation and MRI protocol. Three structural support systems were quantified on stress 3D MRI at maximal Valsalva: vaginal factors (length, width); connective tissue attachment (cervix, lateral paravaginal height); and hiatus factors (urogenital hiatus size, major levator ani injury). Abnormal structural support was defined as any measurement outside the normal range defined as the 5th to 95th percentile in controls from the respective cohort. The percentages of the women with abnormal support in the two cohorts were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among those with prolapse, Chinese women were more likely than white women to have abnormally long vaginal length and width (90% vs 40%, p < 0.001; 53% vs 23%, p = 0.031 respectively). The occurrence of abnormal apical location, paravaginal location, and genital hiatus size ranged from 89 to 100% in Chinese women and from 63 to 80% in white women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prolapse in American white women most commonly involves structural failure of connective tissue attachments and hiatus factors and less frequently involves vaginal wall factors, whereas prolapse in Chinese women frequently involves all support structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRI-Based Structural Failure Comparison between Chinese and American White Women With Prolapse: A Case-Control Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bing Xie, Lahari Nandikanti, Carolyn W Swenson, Jing Wu, Tianhang Liu, Xin Yang, Yi Li, Xiuli Sun, John O DeLancey, Luyun Chen, Jianliu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-024-05945-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Although some evidence suggests that Chinese and white women might have different pelvic floor anatomy such as levator complex and connective tissue support for pelvic organs, it is unknown if these differences affect the mechanisms of pelvic organ prolapse. We sought to determine whether differences exist in MRI-based structural failure patterns between Chinese and American white women with prolapse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a case-control study in different racial cohorts recruited in China and the USA. The Chinese cohort included 19 women with anterior-predominant prolapse and 24 controls with normal pelvic support. The American white cohort included 30 women with anterior-predominant prolapse and 30 controls. Both cohorts underwent the same clinical evaluation and MRI protocol. Three structural support systems were quantified on stress 3D MRI at maximal Valsalva: vaginal factors (length, width); connective tissue attachment (cervix, lateral paravaginal height); and hiatus factors (urogenital hiatus size, major levator ani injury). Abnormal structural support was defined as any measurement outside the normal range defined as the 5th to 95th percentile in controls from the respective cohort. The percentages of the women with abnormal support in the two cohorts were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among those with prolapse, Chinese women were more likely than white women to have abnormally long vaginal length and width (90% vs 40%, p < 0.001; 53% vs 23%, p = 0.031 respectively). The occurrence of abnormal apical location, paravaginal location, and genital hiatus size ranged from 89 to 100% in Chinese women and from 63 to 80% in white women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prolapse in American white women most commonly involves structural failure of connective tissue attachments and hiatus factors and less frequently involves vaginal wall factors, whereas prolapse in Chinese women frequently involves all support structures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05945-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05945-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
MRI-Based Structural Failure Comparison between Chinese and American White Women With Prolapse: A Case-Control Study.
Introduction and hypothesis: Although some evidence suggests that Chinese and white women might have different pelvic floor anatomy such as levator complex and connective tissue support for pelvic organs, it is unknown if these differences affect the mechanisms of pelvic organ prolapse. We sought to determine whether differences exist in MRI-based structural failure patterns between Chinese and American white women with prolapse.
Methods: This is a case-control study in different racial cohorts recruited in China and the USA. The Chinese cohort included 19 women with anterior-predominant prolapse and 24 controls with normal pelvic support. The American white cohort included 30 women with anterior-predominant prolapse and 30 controls. Both cohorts underwent the same clinical evaluation and MRI protocol. Three structural support systems were quantified on stress 3D MRI at maximal Valsalva: vaginal factors (length, width); connective tissue attachment (cervix, lateral paravaginal height); and hiatus factors (urogenital hiatus size, major levator ani injury). Abnormal structural support was defined as any measurement outside the normal range defined as the 5th to 95th percentile in controls from the respective cohort. The percentages of the women with abnormal support in the two cohorts were compared.
Results: Among those with prolapse, Chinese women were more likely than white women to have abnormally long vaginal length and width (90% vs 40%, p < 0.001; 53% vs 23%, p = 0.031 respectively). The occurrence of abnormal apical location, paravaginal location, and genital hiatus size ranged from 89 to 100% in Chinese women and from 63 to 80% in white women.
Conclusions: Prolapse in American white women most commonly involves structural failure of connective tissue attachments and hiatus factors and less frequently involves vaginal wall factors, whereas prolapse in Chinese women frequently involves all support structures.
期刊介绍:
The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion