使用蒸汽隧道 Ho:YAG 脉冲模式进行消融碎石的最佳结石密度。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1007/s11255-024-04289-x
Luis Rico, Leandro Blas, Lorena Banda Ramos, Javier Pizzarello, Carlos Ameri, Pablo Contreras
{"title":"使用蒸汽隧道 Ho:YAG 脉冲模式进行消融碎石的最佳结石密度。","authors":"Luis Rico, Leandro Blas, Lorena Banda Ramos, Javier Pizzarello, Carlos Ameri, Pablo Contreras","doi":"10.1007/s11255-024-04289-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vapor-Tunnel™ (VT) consists of a very long pulse that uses the minimum peak power, causing the energy to pass through a previously created vapor channel or tunnel. There are studies that have shown acceptable ablation lithotripsy efficiency. Nevertheless, there are no in-vivo studies that have compared the VT performance according to the stone density.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 152 patients who underwent RIRS using VT Ho:YAG laser was performed. We divided the patients according to the stone density (Group 1: < 1000UH vs. Group 2: > 1000UH). We assessed the lithotripsy efficiency (mm<sup>3</sup>/JJ) and the laser-energy consumption (JJ/mm<sup>3</sup>). The stone-free rate (SFR) was defined as the absence of stone fragments in a non-contrast abdominal computed tomography 4 weeks after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety three patients were included in Group 1 and 59 in Group 2. Body mass index was higher in Group 1 and the median stone volume was higher in Group 2 (846 vs. 672 mm<sup>3</sup>, p = 0.03). Total energy used (11.9 vs. 24 kj, p < 0.001), the laser emission time (19 vs. 30 min, p < 0.001), and the total operative time (60 vs. 85 min, p < 0.001) were lower in the Group 1. SFR was higher in Group 1 (96.7% vs. 57.6%, p < 0.001) with a global SFR of 81.6%. The ablation lithotripsy efficiency was higher in Group 1 (0.053 mm<sup>3</sup>/JJ vs. 0.035 mm<sup>3</sup>/JJ, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VT Ho:YAG was associated with decreased laser time, operative time and laser-energy consumption in Group 1 than Group 2. Similarly, VT Ho:YAG increased lithotripsy efficiency and the SFR compared to hard stones with the same laser settings and pulse modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal stone density for ablation lithotripsy with vapor tunnel Ho:YAG pulse modality.\",\"authors\":\"Luis Rico, Leandro Blas, Lorena Banda Ramos, Javier Pizzarello, Carlos Ameri, Pablo Contreras\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11255-024-04289-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vapor-Tunnel™ (VT) consists of a very long pulse that uses the minimum peak power, causing the energy to pass through a previously created vapor channel or tunnel. There are studies that have shown acceptable ablation lithotripsy efficiency. Nevertheless, there are no in-vivo studies that have compared the VT performance according to the stone density.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 152 patients who underwent RIRS using VT Ho:YAG laser was performed. We divided the patients according to the stone density (Group 1: < 1000UH vs. Group 2: > 1000UH). We assessed the lithotripsy efficiency (mm<sup>3</sup>/JJ) and the laser-energy consumption (JJ/mm<sup>3</sup>). The stone-free rate (SFR) was defined as the absence of stone fragments in a non-contrast abdominal computed tomography 4 weeks after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety three patients were included in Group 1 and 59 in Group 2. Body mass index was higher in Group 1 and the median stone volume was higher in Group 2 (846 vs. 672 mm<sup>3</sup>, p = 0.03). Total energy used (11.9 vs. 24 kj, p < 0.001), the laser emission time (19 vs. 30 min, p < 0.001), and the total operative time (60 vs. 85 min, p < 0.001) were lower in the Group 1. SFR was higher in Group 1 (96.7% vs. 57.6%, p < 0.001) with a global SFR of 81.6%. The ablation lithotripsy efficiency was higher in Group 1 (0.053 mm<sup>3</sup>/JJ vs. 0.035 mm<sup>3</sup>/JJ, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VT Ho:YAG was associated with decreased laser time, operative time and laser-energy consumption in Group 1 than Group 2. Similarly, VT Ho:YAG increased lithotripsy efficiency and the SFR compared to hard stones with the same laser settings and pulse modality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Urology and Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Urology and Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04289-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04289-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:蒸汽隧道疗法(VT)由一个使用最小峰值功率的超长脉冲组成,使能量通过先前创建的蒸汽通道或隧道。有研究表明,消融碎石的效率是可以接受的。然而,目前还没有根据结石密度比较 VT 性能的体内研究:我们对 152 名使用 VT Ho:YAG 激光进行 RIRS 的患者进行了回顾性研究。我们根据结石密度对患者进行了划分(第 1 组:1000UH)。我们评估了碎石效率(mm3/JJ)和激光能量消耗(JJ/mm3)。无结石率(SFR)是指术后 4 周的非对比腹部计算机断层扫描中没有结石碎片:第 1 组有 93 名患者,第 2 组有 59 名患者。第 1 组患者的体重指数较高,第 2 组患者的结石体积中位数较高(846 mm3 对 672 mm3,P = 0.03)。使用的总能量(11.9 kj vs. 24 kj,p 3/JJ vs. 0.035 mm3/JJ,p 结论:VT Ho:YAG 与结石治疗相关:与第二组相比,第一组的 VT Ho:YAG 减少了激光时间、手术时间和激光能量消耗。 同样,在相同的激光设置和脉冲模式下,与硬结石相比,VT Ho:YAG 提高了碎石效率和 SFR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal stone density for ablation lithotripsy with vapor tunnel Ho:YAG pulse modality.

Introduction: Vapor-Tunnel™ (VT) consists of a very long pulse that uses the minimum peak power, causing the energy to pass through a previously created vapor channel or tunnel. There are studies that have shown acceptable ablation lithotripsy efficiency. Nevertheless, there are no in-vivo studies that have compared the VT performance according to the stone density.

Methods: A retrospective study of 152 patients who underwent RIRS using VT Ho:YAG laser was performed. We divided the patients according to the stone density (Group 1: < 1000UH vs. Group 2: > 1000UH). We assessed the lithotripsy efficiency (mm3/JJ) and the laser-energy consumption (JJ/mm3). The stone-free rate (SFR) was defined as the absence of stone fragments in a non-contrast abdominal computed tomography 4 weeks after the procedure.

Results: Ninety three patients were included in Group 1 and 59 in Group 2. Body mass index was higher in Group 1 and the median stone volume was higher in Group 2 (846 vs. 672 mm3, p = 0.03). Total energy used (11.9 vs. 24 kj, p < 0.001), the laser emission time (19 vs. 30 min, p < 0.001), and the total operative time (60 vs. 85 min, p < 0.001) were lower in the Group 1. SFR was higher in Group 1 (96.7% vs. 57.6%, p < 0.001) with a global SFR of 81.6%. The ablation lithotripsy efficiency was higher in Group 1 (0.053 mm3/JJ vs. 0.035 mm3/JJ, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: VT Ho:YAG was associated with decreased laser time, operative time and laser-energy consumption in Group 1 than Group 2. Similarly, VT Ho:YAG increased lithotripsy efficiency and the SFR compared to hard stones with the same laser settings and pulse modality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Finerenone in type 2 diabetic and albuminuric renal disease patients: three case reports. Crohn's disease-associated IgA nephropathy may prone to better renal outcome. Docetaxel versus androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) against chemo-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): propensity score matched analysis in real world. Analysis of factors influencing the trajectory of fatigue in maintenance haemodialysis patients: a longitudinal study. Prevalence of kidney disease in patients with different types of cancer or hematological malignancies: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1