利用机器学习技术预测艾滋病病毒感染者的病毒抑制情况。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1097/QAI.0000000000003561
Xueying Yang, Ruilie Cai, Yunqing Ma, Hao H Zhang, XiaoWen Sun, Bankole Olatosi, Sharon Weissman, Xiaoming Li, Jiajia Zhang
{"title":"利用机器学习技术预测艾滋病病毒感染者的病毒抑制情况。","authors":"Xueying Yang, Ruilie Cai, Yunqing Ma, Hao H Zhang, XiaoWen Sun, Bankole Olatosi, Sharon Weissman, Xiaoming Li, Jiajia Zhang","doi":"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to develop and examine the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting viral suppression among statewide people living with HIV (PWH) in South Carolina (SC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Extracted through the electronic reporting system in SC, the study population was adult PWH who were diagnosed between 2005-2021. Viral suppression was defined as viral load <200 copies/ml. The predictors, includingsocio-demographics, a historical information of viral load indicators (e.g., viral rebound), comorbidities, healthcare utilization, and annual county-level factors (e.g., social vulnerability) were measured in each 4-month windows. Using historic information in different lag time windows (1-, 3- or 5-lagged time windows with each 4-month as a unit), both traditional and ML approaches (e.g., Long Short-Term Memory network [LSTM]) were applied to predict viral suppression. Comparisons of prediction performance between different models were assessed by area under curve (AUC), recall, precision, F1 score, and Youden index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Machine learning approaches outperformed the generalized linear mixed model. In all the three lagged analysis of a total of 15,580 PWH, the LSTM (lag 1: AUC=0.858; lag 3: AUC=0.877; lag 5: AUC=0.881) algorithm outperformed all the other methods in terms of AUC performance for predicting viral suppression. The top-ranking predictors that were common in different models included historical information of viral suppression, viral rebound, and viral blips in the Lag-1 time window. Inclusion of county level variables did not improve the model prediction accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Supervised machine learning algorithms may offer better performance for risk prediction of viral suppression than traditional statistical methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":14588,"journal":{"name":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using machine learning techniques to predict viral suppression among people with HIV.\",\"authors\":\"Xueying Yang, Ruilie Cai, Yunqing Ma, Hao H Zhang, XiaoWen Sun, Bankole Olatosi, Sharon Weissman, Xiaoming Li, Jiajia Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to develop and examine the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting viral suppression among statewide people living with HIV (PWH) in South Carolina (SC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Extracted through the electronic reporting system in SC, the study population was adult PWH who were diagnosed between 2005-2021. Viral suppression was defined as viral load <200 copies/ml. The predictors, includingsocio-demographics, a historical information of viral load indicators (e.g., viral rebound), comorbidities, healthcare utilization, and annual county-level factors (e.g., social vulnerability) were measured in each 4-month windows. Using historic information in different lag time windows (1-, 3- or 5-lagged time windows with each 4-month as a unit), both traditional and ML approaches (e.g., Long Short-Term Memory network [LSTM]) were applied to predict viral suppression. Comparisons of prediction performance between different models were assessed by area under curve (AUC), recall, precision, F1 score, and Youden index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Machine learning approaches outperformed the generalized linear mixed model. In all the three lagged analysis of a total of 15,580 PWH, the LSTM (lag 1: AUC=0.858; lag 3: AUC=0.877; lag 5: AUC=0.881) algorithm outperformed all the other methods in terms of AUC performance for predicting viral suppression. The top-ranking predictors that were common in different models included historical information of viral suppression, viral rebound, and viral blips in the Lag-1 time window. Inclusion of county level variables did not improve the model prediction accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Supervised machine learning algorithms may offer better performance for risk prediction of viral suppression than traditional statistical methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003561\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003561","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在开发和检验机器学习(ML)算法在预测南卡罗来纳州(SC)全州 HIV 感染者(PWH)病毒抑制情况时的性能:本研究旨在开发和检验机器学习(ML)算法在预测南卡罗来纳州(SC)全州艾滋病病毒感染者(PWH)病毒抑制情况方面的性能:研究对象为 2005-2021 年间确诊的成年艾滋病病毒感染者。病毒抑制定义为病毒载量:机器学习方法优于广义线性混合模型。在对总共 15,580 名 PWH 进行的所有三个滞后分析中,LSTM 算法(滞后 1:AUC=0.858;滞后 3:AUC=0.877;滞后 5:AUC=0.881)在预测病毒抑制的 AUC 性能方面优于所有其他方法。不同模型中常见的排名靠前的预测因子包括病毒抑制的历史信息、病毒反弹以及滞后 1 时间窗中的病毒突变。县级变量的加入并没有提高模型预测的准确性:结论:与传统的统计方法相比,有监督的机器学习算法在病毒抑制的风险预测方面可能有更好的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using machine learning techniques to predict viral suppression among people with HIV.

Background: This study aims to develop and examine the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting viral suppression among statewide people living with HIV (PWH) in South Carolina (SC).

Methods: Extracted through the electronic reporting system in SC, the study population was adult PWH who were diagnosed between 2005-2021. Viral suppression was defined as viral load <200 copies/ml. The predictors, includingsocio-demographics, a historical information of viral load indicators (e.g., viral rebound), comorbidities, healthcare utilization, and annual county-level factors (e.g., social vulnerability) were measured in each 4-month windows. Using historic information in different lag time windows (1-, 3- or 5-lagged time windows with each 4-month as a unit), both traditional and ML approaches (e.g., Long Short-Term Memory network [LSTM]) were applied to predict viral suppression. Comparisons of prediction performance between different models were assessed by area under curve (AUC), recall, precision, F1 score, and Youden index.

Results: Machine learning approaches outperformed the generalized linear mixed model. In all the three lagged analysis of a total of 15,580 PWH, the LSTM (lag 1: AUC=0.858; lag 3: AUC=0.877; lag 5: AUC=0.881) algorithm outperformed all the other methods in terms of AUC performance for predicting viral suppression. The top-ranking predictors that were common in different models included historical information of viral suppression, viral rebound, and viral blips in the Lag-1 time window. Inclusion of county level variables did not improve the model prediction accuracy.

Conclusion: Supervised machine learning algorithms may offer better performance for risk prediction of viral suppression than traditional statistical methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
490
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes​ seeks to end the HIV epidemic by presenting important new science across all disciplines that advance our understanding of the biology, treatment and prevention of HIV infection worldwide. JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes is the trusted, interdisciplinary resource for HIV- and AIDS-related information with a strong focus on basic and translational science, clinical science, and epidemiology and prevention. Co-edited by the foremost leaders in clinical virology, molecular biology, and epidemiology, JAIDS publishes vital information on the advances in diagnosis and treatment of HIV infections, as well as the latest research in the development of therapeutics and vaccine approaches. This ground-breaking journal brings together rigorously peer-reviewed articles, reviews of current research, results of clinical trials, and epidemiologic reports from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine Prophylaxis Has No Effect on Bone Mineral Density and Bone Mineral Content in African Breastfeeding Women Receiving Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV. Using machine learning techniques to predict viral suppression among people with HIV. Non-liver malignancies as main cause of mortality after HCV eradication among people living with HIV. Predictors of Injection Visit Adherence in Those Receiving Injectable Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine. Real-world comparative Analysis of Liposomal Doxorubicin versus Paclitaxel as First-Line Therapy for Kaposi Sarcoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1