Ivan J Huang, Grace T Baek, Jonathan Cohen, Sirin Khajaviyan, Stephanie Louie, Laura Samples, Stephen D Smith, Brian G Till, Edus H Warren, Ajay K Gopal, Christina Poh, Ryan C Lynch, Chaitra S Ujjani, Mazyar Shadman
{"title":"慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者在接受标准 Venetoclax Ramp-Up 治疗的同时接受强化实验室监测的临床意义:真实世界的经验。","authors":"Ivan J Huang, Grace T Baek, Jonathan Cohen, Sirin Khajaviyan, Stephanie Louie, Laura Samples, Stephen D Smith, Brian G Till, Edus H Warren, Ajay K Gopal, Christina Poh, Ryan C Lynch, Chaitra S Ujjani, Mazyar Shadman","doi":"10.1200/OP.24.00416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Venetoclax is the standard of care for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) but requires intensive monitoring for optimal safety. Clinical relevance of intensive monitoring in practice is unknown, especially for patients with low or intermediate risk for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted to determine clinical significance of monitoring for TLS during standard ramp-up for patients with CLL/SLL. Patients receiving abbreviated ramp-up, clinical trials, or concurrent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors were excluded. The primary end point was TLS incidence, with secondary end points describing associated clinical interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five patients met study criteria. The majority of patients received venetoclax as first-line therapy (58%), with anti-CD20 antibody therapy (82%), and were at low risk of TLS (75%). No clinical TLS events occurred, whereas laboratory TLS occurred in only 1.8% of patients. No patients required antihyperuricemic therapy, and few interventions for hyperphosphatemia or hypocalcemia (3.6% of patients) were required. Additional intravenous fluids were uncommonly required (1.8% of patients), and no unplanned hospitalizations were required.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support efforts to reduce intensive monitoring requirements during venetoclax ramp-up for patients with CLL, potentially increasing accessibility of venetoclax.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2400416"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Relevance of Intensive Laboratory Monitoring With Standard Venetoclax Ramp-Up for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Real-World Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Ivan J Huang, Grace T Baek, Jonathan Cohen, Sirin Khajaviyan, Stephanie Louie, Laura Samples, Stephen D Smith, Brian G Till, Edus H Warren, Ajay K Gopal, Christina Poh, Ryan C Lynch, Chaitra S Ujjani, Mazyar Shadman\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/OP.24.00416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Venetoclax is the standard of care for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) but requires intensive monitoring for optimal safety. Clinical relevance of intensive monitoring in practice is unknown, especially for patients with low or intermediate risk for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted to determine clinical significance of monitoring for TLS during standard ramp-up for patients with CLL/SLL. Patients receiving abbreviated ramp-up, clinical trials, or concurrent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors were excluded. The primary end point was TLS incidence, with secondary end points describing associated clinical interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five patients met study criteria. The majority of patients received venetoclax as first-line therapy (58%), with anti-CD20 antibody therapy (82%), and were at low risk of TLS (75%). No clinical TLS events occurred, whereas laboratory TLS occurred in only 1.8% of patients. No patients required antihyperuricemic therapy, and few interventions for hyperphosphatemia or hypocalcemia (3.6% of patients) were required. Additional intravenous fluids were uncommonly required (1.8% of patients), and no unplanned hospitalizations were required.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support efforts to reduce intensive monitoring requirements during venetoclax ramp-up for patients with CLL, potentially increasing accessibility of venetoclax.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"OP2400416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00416\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00416","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Relevance of Intensive Laboratory Monitoring With Standard Venetoclax Ramp-Up for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Real-World Experience.
Purpose: Venetoclax is the standard of care for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) but requires intensive monitoring for optimal safety. Clinical relevance of intensive monitoring in practice is unknown, especially for patients with low or intermediate risk for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS).
Patients and methods: A retrospective review was conducted to determine clinical significance of monitoring for TLS during standard ramp-up for patients with CLL/SLL. Patients receiving abbreviated ramp-up, clinical trials, or concurrent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors were excluded. The primary end point was TLS incidence, with secondary end points describing associated clinical interventions.
Results: Fifty-five patients met study criteria. The majority of patients received venetoclax as first-line therapy (58%), with anti-CD20 antibody therapy (82%), and were at low risk of TLS (75%). No clinical TLS events occurred, whereas laboratory TLS occurred in only 1.8% of patients. No patients required antihyperuricemic therapy, and few interventions for hyperphosphatemia or hypocalcemia (3.6% of patients) were required. Additional intravenous fluids were uncommonly required (1.8% of patients), and no unplanned hospitalizations were required.
Conclusion: These findings support efforts to reduce intensive monitoring requirements during venetoclax ramp-up for patients with CLL, potentially increasing accessibility of venetoclax.