肠道微生物群与骨和关节软骨的恶性和良性肿瘤之间的因果关系:双样本孟德尔随机研究。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000040519
Jia Lv, Xiuyu Qin, Jiani Wang, Jian Li, Junjun Bai, Yanping Lan
{"title":"肠道微生物群与骨和关节软骨的恶性和良性肿瘤之间的因果关系:双样本孟德尔随机研究。","authors":"Jia Lv, Xiuyu Qin, Jiani Wang, Jian Li, Junjun Bai, Yanping Lan","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has demonstrated a close connection between the development of bone neoplasms and variations in the abundance of specific gut microbiota. It remains unclear, however, how the gut microbiota and bone neoplasms are causally related. Hence, in our study, we aim to clarify this relationship between gut microbiota and 2 neoplasms, malignant neoplasm of bone and articular cartilage (MNBAC) and benign neoplasm of bone and articular cartilage (BNBAC), by employing a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. In this study, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from genome-wide association studies-pooled data related to bone neoplasms and gut microbiota abundance were evaluated. The inverse variance weighted was employed as the major method for assessing the aforementioned causal relationship. Furthermore, the horizontal multiplicity was evaluated utilizing the Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier and the MR-Egger intercept test. Finally, inverse MR analysis was performed to assess reverse causality. Inverse variance weighted results indicate a potential genetic relationship between 4 gut microbiota and MNBAC, and 3 gut microbiota and BNBAC. On the one hand, Eubacterium eligens group (OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.04-0.67, P = .01), Odoribacter (OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.06-0.84, P = .03), Slackia (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.13-0.93, P = .04), and Tyzzerella3 (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.24-0.82, P = .01) exhibited a protective effect against MNBAC. On the other hand, of the 3 gut microbes identified as potentially causally related to BNBAC, Oscillibacter (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.63-0.98, P = .03) and Ruminococcus torques group (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.39-0.98, P = .04) were regarded as protective strains of B, while Eubacterium ruminantium group (OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.04-1.47, P = .02) was considered to be a risk factor for increasing the incidence of BNBAC. Additionally, the bone neoplasms were not found to have a reverse causal relationship with the above 7 gut microbiota taxa. Four gut microbiota showed causal effects on MNBAC, and 3 gut microbiota demonstrated causality in BNBAC, providing insights into the design of future interventions to reduce the burden of neoplasms.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"103 46","pages":"e40519"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The causal relationship between gut microbiota and 2 neoplasms, malignant and benign neoplasms of bone and articular cartilage: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.\",\"authors\":\"Jia Lv, Xiuyu Qin, Jiani Wang, Jian Li, Junjun Bai, Yanping Lan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MD.0000000000040519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous research has demonstrated a close connection between the development of bone neoplasms and variations in the abundance of specific gut microbiota. It remains unclear, however, how the gut microbiota and bone neoplasms are causally related. Hence, in our study, we aim to clarify this relationship between gut microbiota and 2 neoplasms, malignant neoplasm of bone and articular cartilage (MNBAC) and benign neoplasm of bone and articular cartilage (BNBAC), by employing a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. In this study, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from genome-wide association studies-pooled data related to bone neoplasms and gut microbiota abundance were evaluated. The inverse variance weighted was employed as the major method for assessing the aforementioned causal relationship. Furthermore, the horizontal multiplicity was evaluated utilizing the Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier and the MR-Egger intercept test. Finally, inverse MR analysis was performed to assess reverse causality. Inverse variance weighted results indicate a potential genetic relationship between 4 gut microbiota and MNBAC, and 3 gut microbiota and BNBAC. On the one hand, Eubacterium eligens group (OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.04-0.67, P = .01), Odoribacter (OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.06-0.84, P = .03), Slackia (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.13-0.93, P = .04), and Tyzzerella3 (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.24-0.82, P = .01) exhibited a protective effect against MNBAC. On the other hand, of the 3 gut microbes identified as potentially causally related to BNBAC, Oscillibacter (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.63-0.98, P = .03) and Ruminococcus torques group (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.39-0.98, P = .04) were regarded as protective strains of B, while Eubacterium ruminantium group (OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.04-1.47, P = .02) was considered to be a risk factor for increasing the incidence of BNBAC. Additionally, the bone neoplasms were not found to have a reverse causal relationship with the above 7 gut microbiota taxa. Four gut microbiota showed causal effects on MNBAC, and 3 gut microbiota demonstrated causality in BNBAC, providing insights into the design of future interventions to reduce the burden of neoplasms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine\",\"volume\":\"103 46\",\"pages\":\"e40519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576038/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040519\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的研究表明,骨肿瘤的发生与特定肠道微生物群的丰度变化密切相关。然而,肠道微生物群与骨肿瘤之间的因果关系仍不清楚。因此,在我们的研究中,我们采用双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)方法,旨在阐明肠道微生物群与两种肿瘤(骨和关节软骨恶性肿瘤(MNBAC)和骨和关节软骨良性肿瘤(BNBAC))之间的关系。本研究评估了来自全基因组关联研究--与骨肿瘤和肠道微生物群丰度相关的集合数据的单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)。反方差加权法是评估上述因果关系的主要方法。此外,还利用孟德尔随机多态性残差和离群值以及 MR-Egger 截距检验对水平多重性进行了评估。最后,进行了反向 MR 分析以评估反向因果关系。反向方差加权结果表明,4 个肠道微生物群与 MNBAC、3 个肠道微生物群与 BNBAC 之间存在潜在的遗传关系。一方面,Eubacterium eligens 组(OR = 0.16,95% CI = 0.04-0.67,P = .01)、Odoribacter(OR = 0.23,95% CI = 0.06-0.84,P = .03)、Slackia(OR = 0.35,95% CI = 0.13-0.93,P = .04)和 Tyzzerella3(OR = 0.44,95% CI = 0.24-0.82,P = .01)对 MNBAC 具有保护作用。另一方面,在确定与 BNBAC 有潜在因果关系的 3 种肠道微生物中,Oscillibacter(OR = 0.79,95% CI = 0.63-0.98,P = .03)和 Ruminococcus torques 组(OR = 0.62,95% CI = 0.39-0.98,P = .04)被认为是B的保护性菌株,而Eubacterium ruminantium组(OR = 1.24,95% CI = 1.04-1.47,P = .02)被认为是增加BNBAC发病率的危险因素。此外,未发现骨肿瘤与上述 7 个肠道微生物群分类群有反向因果关系。4个肠道微生物群对MNBAC有因果效应,3个肠道微生物群对BNBAC有因果效应,这为设计未来的干预措施以减少肿瘤负担提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The causal relationship between gut microbiota and 2 neoplasms, malignant and benign neoplasms of bone and articular cartilage: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Previous research has demonstrated a close connection between the development of bone neoplasms and variations in the abundance of specific gut microbiota. It remains unclear, however, how the gut microbiota and bone neoplasms are causally related. Hence, in our study, we aim to clarify this relationship between gut microbiota and 2 neoplasms, malignant neoplasm of bone and articular cartilage (MNBAC) and benign neoplasm of bone and articular cartilage (BNBAC), by employing a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. In this study, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from genome-wide association studies-pooled data related to bone neoplasms and gut microbiota abundance were evaluated. The inverse variance weighted was employed as the major method for assessing the aforementioned causal relationship. Furthermore, the horizontal multiplicity was evaluated utilizing the Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier and the MR-Egger intercept test. Finally, inverse MR analysis was performed to assess reverse causality. Inverse variance weighted results indicate a potential genetic relationship between 4 gut microbiota and MNBAC, and 3 gut microbiota and BNBAC. On the one hand, Eubacterium eligens group (OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.04-0.67, P = .01), Odoribacter (OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.06-0.84, P = .03), Slackia (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.13-0.93, P = .04), and Tyzzerella3 (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.24-0.82, P = .01) exhibited a protective effect against MNBAC. On the other hand, of the 3 gut microbes identified as potentially causally related to BNBAC, Oscillibacter (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.63-0.98, P = .03) and Ruminococcus torques group (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.39-0.98, P = .04) were regarded as protective strains of B, while Eubacterium ruminantium group (OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.04-1.47, P = .02) was considered to be a risk factor for increasing the incidence of BNBAC. Additionally, the bone neoplasms were not found to have a reverse causal relationship with the above 7 gut microbiota taxa. Four gut microbiota showed causal effects on MNBAC, and 3 gut microbiota demonstrated causality in BNBAC, providing insights into the design of future interventions to reduce the burden of neoplasms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A case report of rectal small-cell undifferentiated carcinoma achieved pathological complete response. Neutrophil phenotypes in prolonged labor: Implications for therapeutic strategies. Nonlinear association of alkaline phosphatase-to-albumin ratio with all-cause and cancer mortality: Evidence from NHANES 2005 to 2016. New ultrasound-guided L5 selective nerve root block puncture approach for the treatment of pain due to high-iliac-crest lumbar disc herniation: A case report. Observation on the efficacy and safety of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with preservation of the urethral mucosa from the bladder neck to the tip of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1