治疗骨盆后环骨折的新型微创方法:骶髂关节锁定板的生物力学验证和临床应用。

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1111/os.14291
Liang Jin, Xiaorui Hao, Zhenzhu Zhang, Qiaoli Zhang, Shuxin Zhang, Fei Zhou, Shuirong Yang, Weijie Zheng, Xiaohui Xiong, Wanchen Gong, Yukun Wang, Xiaojie Chen, Jiexin Huang
{"title":"治疗骨盆后环骨折的新型微创方法:骶髂关节锁定板的生物力学验证和临床应用。","authors":"Liang Jin, Xiaorui Hao, Zhenzhu Zhang, Qiaoli Zhang, Shuxin Zhang, Fei Zhou, Shuirong Yang, Weijie Zheng, Xiaohui Xiong, Wanchen Gong, Yukun Wang, Xiaojie Chen, Jiexin Huang","doi":"10.1111/os.14291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Considering the high incidence and complexity of unstable posterior pelvic ring fractures, and the need for less invasive and more effective treatment options, this study aims to introduce a novel minimally invasive, safe, and simple internal fixation method for the treatment of unstable posterior pelvic ring fractures using the sacroiliac joint locking plate (SJP) system, and to provide biomechanical validation and clinical evaluation of this method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Biomechanical research was conducted using standard pelvic bone models from Synbone, Switzerland, to create Denis II zone unstable posterior pelvic ring fracture models, and to assess the stability of the SJP under different loads compared with traditional fixation methods. A retrospective clinical study analyzed the clinical efficacy of SJP treatment in 62 patients (mean age of 51.7 ± 11.9 years and male-to-female ratio of 42/20) treated at our hospital from October 2016 to January 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Biomechanical tests showed that at a maximum load of 300 N, the displacement values for the SJP (3.361 ± 0.246 mm) and two iliosacral (IS) screws (3.325 ± 0.335 mm) were significantly lower than those for a single IS screw (4.281 ± 0.399 mm) and tension band plate (TBP) (4.678 ± 0.534 mm). In the stiffness test of the compression-separation experiment, the average stiffness of the SJP (92.09 ± 1.17 N/mm) was higher than that of a single IS screw (80.06 ± 2.57 N/mm) and TBP (71.67 ± 1.12 N/mm) (p < 0.05 for both), but lower than that of two IS screws (104.94 ± 1.16 N/mm) (p < 0.05). Clinically, postoperative pain scores decreased to 1.9 ± 0.9 after SJP surgery, which was a significant reduction compared with the preoperative score of 9.1 ± 1.1. Functional prognosis scores improved from 36.1 ± 11.5 preoperatively to 88.4 ± 14.2, showing a marked improvement. The postoperative Majeed scores for the patients were 87.4 ± 8.1, and the incidence of complications was low, with only one case reported so far.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SJP demonstrates robust stability in biomechanical experiments, making it highly advantageous for clinical applications and widespread adoption. It offers several benefits, including straightforward surgical operation, minimal risk of vascular and neural injury, low surgical requirements, and eliminates the need for fluoroscopy. These advantages contribute to its remarkable clinical efficacy and potential for extensive utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Minimally Invasive Method for Treating Posterior Pelvic Ring Fractures: Biomechanical Validation and Clinical Application of Sacroiliac Joint Locking Plate.\",\"authors\":\"Liang Jin, Xiaorui Hao, Zhenzhu Zhang, Qiaoli Zhang, Shuxin Zhang, Fei Zhou, Shuirong Yang, Weijie Zheng, Xiaohui Xiong, Wanchen Gong, Yukun Wang, Xiaojie Chen, Jiexin Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/os.14291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Considering the high incidence and complexity of unstable posterior pelvic ring fractures, and the need for less invasive and more effective treatment options, this study aims to introduce a novel minimally invasive, safe, and simple internal fixation method for the treatment of unstable posterior pelvic ring fractures using the sacroiliac joint locking plate (SJP) system, and to provide biomechanical validation and clinical evaluation of this method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Biomechanical research was conducted using standard pelvic bone models from Synbone, Switzerland, to create Denis II zone unstable posterior pelvic ring fracture models, and to assess the stability of the SJP under different loads compared with traditional fixation methods. A retrospective clinical study analyzed the clinical efficacy of SJP treatment in 62 patients (mean age of 51.7 ± 11.9 years and male-to-female ratio of 42/20) treated at our hospital from October 2016 to January 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Biomechanical tests showed that at a maximum load of 300 N, the displacement values for the SJP (3.361 ± 0.246 mm) and two iliosacral (IS) screws (3.325 ± 0.335 mm) were significantly lower than those for a single IS screw (4.281 ± 0.399 mm) and tension band plate (TBP) (4.678 ± 0.534 mm). In the stiffness test of the compression-separation experiment, the average stiffness of the SJP (92.09 ± 1.17 N/mm) was higher than that of a single IS screw (80.06 ± 2.57 N/mm) and TBP (71.67 ± 1.12 N/mm) (p < 0.05 for both), but lower than that of two IS screws (104.94 ± 1.16 N/mm) (p < 0.05). Clinically, postoperative pain scores decreased to 1.9 ± 0.9 after SJP surgery, which was a significant reduction compared with the preoperative score of 9.1 ± 1.1. Functional prognosis scores improved from 36.1 ± 11.5 preoperatively to 88.4 ± 14.2, showing a marked improvement. The postoperative Majeed scores for the patients were 87.4 ± 8.1, and the incidence of complications was low, with only one case reported so far.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SJP demonstrates robust stability in biomechanical experiments, making it highly advantageous for clinical applications and widespread adoption. It offers several benefits, including straightforward surgical operation, minimal risk of vascular and neural injury, low surgical requirements, and eliminates the need for fluoroscopy. These advantages contribute to its remarkable clinical efficacy and potential for extensive utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14291\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的考虑到不稳定后骨盆环骨折的高发病率和复杂性,以及对微创和更有效治疗方案的需求,本研究旨在介绍一种新型的微创、安全和简单的内固定方法,利用骶髂关节锁定钢板(SJP)系统治疗不稳定后骨盆环骨折,并对该方法进行生物力学验证和临床评估:使用瑞士 Synbone 公司提供的标准骨盆骨模型进行生物力学研究,创建 Denis II 区不稳定后骨盆环骨折模型,并与传统固定方法相比,评估骶髂关节锁定钢板在不同负荷下的稳定性。一项回顾性临床研究分析了2016年10月至2023年1月在我院接受治疗的62例患者(平均年龄为51.7±11.9岁,男女比例为42/20)的SJP治疗临床疗效:生物力学测试表明,在最大载荷为 300 N 时,SJP(3.361 ± 0.246 mm)和两个髂骶螺钉(3.325 ± 0.335 mm)的位移值明显低于单个髂骶螺钉(4.281 ± 0.399 mm)和张力带钢板(4.678 ± 0.534 mm)。在压缩分离实验的刚度测试中,SJP 的平均刚度(92.09 ± 1.17 N/mm)高于单 IS 螺钉(80.06 ± 2.57 N/mm)和 TBP(71.67 ± 1.12 N/mm)(p 结论):SJP 在生物力学实验中表现出很强的稳定性,因此非常适合临床应用和广泛采用。它具有多种优势,包括手术操作简单、血管和神经损伤风险极小、手术要求低以及无需透视。这些优势使其具有显著的临床疗效和广泛应用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New Minimally Invasive Method for Treating Posterior Pelvic Ring Fractures: Biomechanical Validation and Clinical Application of Sacroiliac Joint Locking Plate.

Objective: Considering the high incidence and complexity of unstable posterior pelvic ring fractures, and the need for less invasive and more effective treatment options, this study aims to introduce a novel minimally invasive, safe, and simple internal fixation method for the treatment of unstable posterior pelvic ring fractures using the sacroiliac joint locking plate (SJP) system, and to provide biomechanical validation and clinical evaluation of this method.

Methods: Biomechanical research was conducted using standard pelvic bone models from Synbone, Switzerland, to create Denis II zone unstable posterior pelvic ring fracture models, and to assess the stability of the SJP under different loads compared with traditional fixation methods. A retrospective clinical study analyzed the clinical efficacy of SJP treatment in 62 patients (mean age of 51.7 ± 11.9 years and male-to-female ratio of 42/20) treated at our hospital from October 2016 to January 2023.

Results: Biomechanical tests showed that at a maximum load of 300 N, the displacement values for the SJP (3.361 ± 0.246 mm) and two iliosacral (IS) screws (3.325 ± 0.335 mm) were significantly lower than those for a single IS screw (4.281 ± 0.399 mm) and tension band plate (TBP) (4.678 ± 0.534 mm). In the stiffness test of the compression-separation experiment, the average stiffness of the SJP (92.09 ± 1.17 N/mm) was higher than that of a single IS screw (80.06 ± 2.57 N/mm) and TBP (71.67 ± 1.12 N/mm) (p < 0.05 for both), but lower than that of two IS screws (104.94 ± 1.16 N/mm) (p < 0.05). Clinically, postoperative pain scores decreased to 1.9 ± 0.9 after SJP surgery, which was a significant reduction compared with the preoperative score of 9.1 ± 1.1. Functional prognosis scores improved from 36.1 ± 11.5 preoperatively to 88.4 ± 14.2, showing a marked improvement. The postoperative Majeed scores for the patients were 87.4 ± 8.1, and the incidence of complications was low, with only one case reported so far.

Conclusion: The SJP demonstrates robust stability in biomechanical experiments, making it highly advantageous for clinical applications and widespread adoption. It offers several benefits, including straightforward surgical operation, minimal risk of vascular and neural injury, low surgical requirements, and eliminates the need for fluoroscopy. These advantages contribute to its remarkable clinical efficacy and potential for extensive utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
期刊最新文献
Observation of the Clinical Efficacy of Self-Modified Skin-Stretching Device in the Treatment of Soft-Tissue Defects of the Heel: A Retrospective Single-Arm Cohort Study. How Accurately Does Bone Mineral Density Predict Bone Strength? A Clinical Observational Study of Osteoporosis Vertebral Compression Fractures in Postmenopausal Women. Comparison of Therapeutic Effects of Different Rehabilitation Methods on Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pear-Shaped Disc as a Risk Factor for Postoperative Sclerotic Modic Changes After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Research Progress on the Posterior Midline Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1