全国急诊科拥挤程度量表与工作人员的工作量感知:儿科环境中结构有效性的证据。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003300
Kenneth W McKinley, Joan S Bregstein, Rimma Perotte, Daniel Fenster, Maria Kwok, Jake Rose, Megan Nye, Meridith Sonnett, David O Kessler
{"title":"全国急诊科拥挤程度量表与工作人员的工作量感知:儿科环境中结构有效性的证据。","authors":"Kenneth W McKinley, Joan S Bregstein, Rimma Perotte, Daniel Fenster, Maria Kwok, Jake Rose, Megan Nye, Meridith Sonnett, David O Kessler","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to determine if there is a correlation between perceived staff workload, measured by the NASA Task Load Index (TLX), and the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale (NEDOCS) in a pediatric ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected staff questionnaires in a large, urban pediatric ED to assess perceived workload on each of six different TLX subscales, which we weighted evenly to create an overall estimate of workload. We evaluated the correlation between individual TLX responses and NEDOCS overall and by staff subgroup. Additionally, we analyzed: (1) the correlation between mean TLX responses and NEDOCS within a given hour and (2) the performance of a logistic regression model, using TLX as a predictor for \"severely overcrowded,\" as measured by NEDOCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred one questionnaires between 6/2018 and 1/2019 demonstrated significant variation between concurrently collected TLX responses and an overall poor correlation between perceived workload and NEDOCS (R2 0.096 [95% confidence interval, 0.048-0.16]). TLX responses by subgroups of fellows (n = 4, R2 0.96) and patient financial advisors (n = 15, R2 0.58) demonstrated the highest correlation with NEDOCS. Taking mean TLX responses within a given hour, during periods with NEDOCS >60 (extremely busy or overcrowded), a polynomial trend line matched the data best (R2 0.638). On logistic regression, the TLX predicts \"severely overcrowded\" with an area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic of 0.731.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NEDOCS does not have a strong correlation with individual responses on questionnaires of perceived workload for staff in a pediatric ED. NEDOCS, as a measure of overcrowding, may be better correlated with perceived workload during periods with elevated crowding or when interpreted categorically as yes/no \"severely overcrowded\".</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale and Perceived Staff Workload: Evidence for Construct Validity in a Pediatric Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth W McKinley, Joan S Bregstein, Rimma Perotte, Daniel Fenster, Maria Kwok, Jake Rose, Megan Nye, Meridith Sonnett, David O Kessler\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to determine if there is a correlation between perceived staff workload, measured by the NASA Task Load Index (TLX), and the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale (NEDOCS) in a pediatric ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected staff questionnaires in a large, urban pediatric ED to assess perceived workload on each of six different TLX subscales, which we weighted evenly to create an overall estimate of workload. We evaluated the correlation between individual TLX responses and NEDOCS overall and by staff subgroup. Additionally, we analyzed: (1) the correlation between mean TLX responses and NEDOCS within a given hour and (2) the performance of a logistic regression model, using TLX as a predictor for \\\"severely overcrowded,\\\" as measured by NEDOCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred one questionnaires between 6/2018 and 1/2019 demonstrated significant variation between concurrently collected TLX responses and an overall poor correlation between perceived workload and NEDOCS (R2 0.096 [95% confidence interval, 0.048-0.16]). TLX responses by subgroups of fellows (n = 4, R2 0.96) and patient financial advisors (n = 15, R2 0.58) demonstrated the highest correlation with NEDOCS. Taking mean TLX responses within a given hour, during periods with NEDOCS >60 (extremely busy or overcrowded), a polynomial trend line matched the data best (R2 0.638). On logistic regression, the TLX predicts \\\"severely overcrowded\\\" with an area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic of 0.731.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NEDOCS does not have a strong correlation with individual responses on questionnaires of perceived workload for staff in a pediatric ED. NEDOCS, as a measure of overcrowding, may be better correlated with perceived workload during periods with elevated crowding or when interpreted categorically as yes/no \\\"severely overcrowded\\\".</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003300\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在确定在儿科急诊室中,由 NASA 任务负荷指数(TLX)衡量的员工感知工作量与国家急诊室拥挤程度量表(NEDOCS)之间是否存在相关性:方法:我们在一个大型城市儿科急诊室收集了员工问卷,以评估员工对 TLX 六个不同分量表中每个分量表的工作量感知,并对这些分量表进行平均加权,以得出总体工作量估算值。我们评估了各 TLX 答案与 NEDOCS 整体之间的相关性,并按员工分组进行了分析。此外,我们还分析了:(1) 特定小时内 TLX 平均值与 NEDOCS 之间的相关性;(2) 以 TLX 作为预测 NEDOCS 所衡量的 "严重拥挤 "的逻辑回归模型的性能:2018 年 6 月至 2019 年 1 月期间的 4001 份调查问卷显示,同时收集的 TLX 答案之间存在显著差异,感知工作量与 NEDOCS 之间的总体相关性较差(R2 0.096 [95% 置信区间,0.048-0.16])。研究员(n = 4,R2 0.96)和患者财务顾问(n = 15,R2 0.58)等亚组的 TLX 反应与 NEDOCS 的相关性最高。在 NEDOCS >60(极度繁忙或人满为患)期间,以给定小时内的平均 TLX 反应计算,多项式趋势线与数据的匹配度最高(R2 0.638)。在逻辑回归中,TLX 预测 "严重拥挤 "的接收器工作特征曲线下面积为 0.731.结论:结论:NEDOCS与儿科急诊室员工对工作量感知问卷的个人回答并无密切联系。NEDOCS 作为拥挤程度的一种测量方法,在拥挤程度较高的时期,或以是/否 "严重拥挤 "来分类解释时,与感知工作量的相关性可能会更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale and Perceived Staff Workload: Evidence for Construct Validity in a Pediatric Setting.

Objective: The aim of the study is to determine if there is a correlation between perceived staff workload, measured by the NASA Task Load Index (TLX), and the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale (NEDOCS) in a pediatric ED.

Methods: We collected staff questionnaires in a large, urban pediatric ED to assess perceived workload on each of six different TLX subscales, which we weighted evenly to create an overall estimate of workload. We evaluated the correlation between individual TLX responses and NEDOCS overall and by staff subgroup. Additionally, we analyzed: (1) the correlation between mean TLX responses and NEDOCS within a given hour and (2) the performance of a logistic regression model, using TLX as a predictor for "severely overcrowded," as measured by NEDOCS.

Results: Four hundred one questionnaires between 6/2018 and 1/2019 demonstrated significant variation between concurrently collected TLX responses and an overall poor correlation between perceived workload and NEDOCS (R2 0.096 [95% confidence interval, 0.048-0.16]). TLX responses by subgroups of fellows (n = 4, R2 0.96) and patient financial advisors (n = 15, R2 0.58) demonstrated the highest correlation with NEDOCS. Taking mean TLX responses within a given hour, during periods with NEDOCS >60 (extremely busy or overcrowded), a polynomial trend line matched the data best (R2 0.638). On logistic regression, the TLX predicts "severely overcrowded" with an area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic of 0.731.

Conclusions: NEDOCS does not have a strong correlation with individual responses on questionnaires of perceived workload for staff in a pediatric ED. NEDOCS, as a measure of overcrowding, may be better correlated with perceived workload during periods with elevated crowding or when interpreted categorically as yes/no "severely overcrowded".

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
Streamlining Telecommunications Center and Interfacility Patient Throughput to a Pediatric Emergency Department by Utilizing an Electronic Handoff: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Point-of-Care Ultrasound Evaluation of Pediatric Osteomyelitis in the Emergency Department: A Case Series. Sometimes, One Pill Really Can Kill. Video Versus Nonvideo in a Rabbit Training Model for Establishing an Emergency Front of Neck Airway in Children: A Prospective Trial. The Impact of Legalizing Recreational Cannabis on the Children of a Neighboring State.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1