子痫前期筛查试验:寻找临床实用性。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101554
Yossi Bart, Rebecca Horgan, George Saade, Baha M Sibai
{"title":"子痫前期筛查试验:寻找临床实用性。","authors":"Yossi Bart, Rebecca Horgan, George Saade, Baha M Sibai","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The research and implementation process for a new screening test should involve two steps. First, one has to demonstrate that the test can predict a certain outcome or appropriately stratify the patients based on risk for the outcome. The second step requires evidence of clinical utility. The Food and Drug Administration has approved screening tests for risk stratification or progression of preeclampsia despite the absence of data on clinical utility. Introduction into clinical practice and eventual integration into the standard of care might follow quickly, making a clinical utility trial challenging to accomplish. This manuscript provides an overview of the research and regulatory pathways used for screening and diagnostic tests in medicine in general and obstetrics in particular. For illustration purposes, we review the relevant data gathered so far regarding tests that are promoted for prediction, risk stratification, and progression of preeclampsia. We then discuss the importance of proving clinical utility before introducing tests into clinical practice and the potential unintended consequences of adoption prior to proving clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101554"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening Tests for Preeclampsia: in Search of Clinical Utility.\",\"authors\":\"Yossi Bart, Rebecca Horgan, George Saade, Baha M Sibai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The research and implementation process for a new screening test should involve two steps. First, one has to demonstrate that the test can predict a certain outcome or appropriately stratify the patients based on risk for the outcome. The second step requires evidence of clinical utility. The Food and Drug Administration has approved screening tests for risk stratification or progression of preeclampsia despite the absence of data on clinical utility. Introduction into clinical practice and eventual integration into the standard of care might follow quickly, making a clinical utility trial challenging to accomplish. This manuscript provides an overview of the research and regulatory pathways used for screening and diagnostic tests in medicine in general and obstetrics in particular. For illustration purposes, we review the relevant data gathered so far regarding tests that are promoted for prediction, risk stratification, and progression of preeclampsia. We then discuss the importance of proving clinical utility before introducing tests into clinical practice and the potential unintended consequences of adoption prior to proving clinical utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101554\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101554","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新筛查检验的研究和实施过程应包括两个步骤。首先,必须证明该检测可预测某种结果,或根据结果的风险对患者进行适当分层。第二步需要证明其临床实用性。尽管缺乏有关临床实用性的数据,但美国食品和药物管理局还是批准了用于子痫前期风险分层或病情进展的筛查试验。在临床实践中引入并最终纳入标准护理可能会很快,因此临床实用性试验的完成具有挑战性。本手稿概述了医学,尤其是产科筛查和诊断测试的研究和监管途径。为了说明问题,我们回顾了迄今为止收集到的有关子痫前期预测、风险分层和病情进展测试的相关数据。然后,我们讨论了在将检验项目引入临床实践之前证明其临床实用性的重要性,以及在证明临床实用性之前采用检验项目可能产生的意外后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Screening Tests for Preeclampsia: in Search of Clinical Utility.

The research and implementation process for a new screening test should involve two steps. First, one has to demonstrate that the test can predict a certain outcome or appropriately stratify the patients based on risk for the outcome. The second step requires evidence of clinical utility. The Food and Drug Administration has approved screening tests for risk stratification or progression of preeclampsia despite the absence of data on clinical utility. Introduction into clinical practice and eventual integration into the standard of care might follow quickly, making a clinical utility trial challenging to accomplish. This manuscript provides an overview of the research and regulatory pathways used for screening and diagnostic tests in medicine in general and obstetrics in particular. For illustration purposes, we review the relevant data gathered so far regarding tests that are promoted for prediction, risk stratification, and progression of preeclampsia. We then discuss the importance of proving clinical utility before introducing tests into clinical practice and the potential unintended consequences of adoption prior to proving clinical utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
期刊最新文献
Evidence-based Cesarean Delivery: Postoperative Care (Part 10). Screening Tests for Preeclampsia: in Search of Clinical Utility. The impact of obstetrics and gynecology journal podcasts on the dissemination of featured articles. The two-hour second stage rule: the 1817 labor of the Princess of Wales. Does Combining Warm Perineal Compresses with Perineal Massage During the Second Stage of Labor Reduce Perineal Trauma? A Randomized Controlled Trial: Warm compresses for reducing perineal trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1