探索针对老年人的长期护理机构和医院的跌倒后管理干预措施:范围审查。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1111/jocn.17546
Abhishek Parekh, Keith D Hill, Raphaëlle Ashley Guerbaai
{"title":"探索针对老年人的长期护理机构和医院的跌倒后管理干预措施:范围审查。","authors":"Abhishek Parekh, Keith D Hill, Raphaëlle Ashley Guerbaai","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The population is rapidly growing, significantly impacting healthcare settings such as hospitals and long-term care. Falls are a major concern, being a leading cause of hospitalisations and injuries especially among adults aged 60 and above. Despite extensive research on falls prevention and risk factors, there is limited study on effective post-fall management strategies, making it crucial to review and develop interventions to improve care and safety for older adults in healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the interventions implemented for post-fall management for residents and patients within healthcare settings, including hospitals and long-term care facilities.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A scoping literature review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Eligible articles included hospital and long-term care post-fall management interventions. Data were manually extracted by two independent reviewers using the AACTT (Actor, Action, Context, Target and Time) Framework to detail intervention characteristics and guide the data charting process, allowing for thematic analysis and narrative synthesis of key findings.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Scopus were searched from inception until 30th September 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen articles were included. Over half the studies (55.5%) focused on post-fall interventions in LTCFs, testing assessment tools (50%), structured protocols (27.7%), huddles (11.1%) or multifactorial approaches (11.1%), with varied effectiveness. While assessment tools and huddles showed mixed results, structured protocols showed encouraging results with reduced unnecessary hospital transfers and hospitalisations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review identified a variety of interventions used after falls in healthcare settings. However, there is inconclusive evidence about the effectiveness of interventions to reduce hospitalisation and injuries. This review identified areas for research that may help to inform post-fall management, including the need for further research into various interventions (e.g., standardised toolkit) to enhance care immediately following a fall.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No Patient or Public Contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Post-Fall Management Interventions in Long-Term Care Facilities and Hospitals for Older Adults: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Abhishek Parekh, Keith D Hill, Raphaëlle Ashley Guerbaai\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The population is rapidly growing, significantly impacting healthcare settings such as hospitals and long-term care. Falls are a major concern, being a leading cause of hospitalisations and injuries especially among adults aged 60 and above. Despite extensive research on falls prevention and risk factors, there is limited study on effective post-fall management strategies, making it crucial to review and develop interventions to improve care and safety for older adults in healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the interventions implemented for post-fall management for residents and patients within healthcare settings, including hospitals and long-term care facilities.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A scoping literature review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Eligible articles included hospital and long-term care post-fall management interventions. Data were manually extracted by two independent reviewers using the AACTT (Actor, Action, Context, Target and Time) Framework to detail intervention characteristics and guide the data charting process, allowing for thematic analysis and narrative synthesis of key findings.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Scopus were searched from inception until 30th September 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen articles were included. Over half the studies (55.5%) focused on post-fall interventions in LTCFs, testing assessment tools (50%), structured protocols (27.7%), huddles (11.1%) or multifactorial approaches (11.1%), with varied effectiveness. While assessment tools and huddles showed mixed results, structured protocols showed encouraging results with reduced unnecessary hospital transfers and hospitalisations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review identified a variety of interventions used after falls in healthcare settings. However, there is inconclusive evidence about the effectiveness of interventions to reduce hospitalisation and injuries. This review identified areas for research that may help to inform post-fall management, including the need for further research into various interventions (e.g., standardised toolkit) to enhance care immediately following a fall.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No Patient or Public Contribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17546\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17546","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人口迅速增长,对医院和长期护理等医疗机构产生了重大影响。跌倒是一个主要问题,也是住院和受伤的主要原因,尤其是在 60 岁及以上的成年人中。尽管对跌倒预防和风险因素进行了广泛研究,但对跌倒后有效管理策略的研究却很有限,因此审查和制定干预措施以改善医疗机构中老年人的护理和安全至关重要:设计:范围性文献综述:方法:我们采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的指南和用于范围界定综述的系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目扩展版(PRISMA-ScR)。符合条件的文章包括医院和长期护理机构的跌倒后管理干预措施。数据由两名独立审稿人使用 AACTT(行动者、行动、情境、目标和时间)框架进行人工提取,以详细说明干预措施的特点并指导数据制图过程,以便进行专题分析和关键发现的叙述性综合:数据来源:对 Medline、CINAHL、PsychINFO 和 Scopus 进行了检索,检索时间从开始到 2024 年 9 月 30 日:结果:共纳入 18 篇文章。半数以上的研究(55.5%)关注的是长者照护中心的跌倒后干预措施,测试了评估工具(50%)、结构化方案(27.7%)、抱团(11.1%)或多因素方法(11.1%),效果各不相同。评估工具和分组讨论的效果参差不齐,而结构化方案则在减少不必要的转院和住院方面取得了令人鼓舞的成果:本次范围界定综述确定了在医疗机构发生跌倒后使用的各种干预措施。然而,关于减少住院和伤害的干预措施的有效性,目前尚无定论。本综述确定了有助于为跌倒后管理提供信息的研究领域,包括需要进一步研究各种干预措施(如标准化工具包),以加强跌倒后的即时护理:无患者或公众贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring Post-Fall Management Interventions in Long-Term Care Facilities and Hospitals for Older Adults: A Scoping Review.

Background: The population is rapidly growing, significantly impacting healthcare settings such as hospitals and long-term care. Falls are a major concern, being a leading cause of hospitalisations and injuries especially among adults aged 60 and above. Despite extensive research on falls prevention and risk factors, there is limited study on effective post-fall management strategies, making it crucial to review and develop interventions to improve care and safety for older adults in healthcare settings.

Aim: To explore the interventions implemented for post-fall management for residents and patients within healthcare settings, including hospitals and long-term care facilities.

Design: A scoping literature review.

Methods: We used the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Eligible articles included hospital and long-term care post-fall management interventions. Data were manually extracted by two independent reviewers using the AACTT (Actor, Action, Context, Target and Time) Framework to detail intervention characteristics and guide the data charting process, allowing for thematic analysis and narrative synthesis of key findings.

Data sources: Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Scopus were searched from inception until 30th September 2024.

Results: Eighteen articles were included. Over half the studies (55.5%) focused on post-fall interventions in LTCFs, testing assessment tools (50%), structured protocols (27.7%), huddles (11.1%) or multifactorial approaches (11.1%), with varied effectiveness. While assessment tools and huddles showed mixed results, structured protocols showed encouraging results with reduced unnecessary hospital transfers and hospitalisations.

Conclusion: This scoping review identified a variety of interventions used after falls in healthcare settings. However, there is inconclusive evidence about the effectiveness of interventions to reduce hospitalisation and injuries. This review identified areas for research that may help to inform post-fall management, including the need for further research into various interventions (e.g., standardised toolkit) to enhance care immediately following a fall.

Patient or public contribution: No Patient or Public Contribution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
期刊最新文献
Clinicians' and Patients' Experiences and Perceptions on the Prevention and Management of Surgical Site Infections: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. The Vital Signs Criteria Suffers From Poor Accuracy to Recognise Critically Ill Patients. Exploring the Experiences of Community-Dwelling Older Adults Participating in Group Interaction Programs: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. Issue Information Isolated and Combined Effects of Sedentary Behaviour and Physical Activity on Muscle Strength in Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1