2018-2020 年刚果民主共和国埃博拉疫情爆发期间,非埃博拉患者利用医疗设施的障碍和促进因素。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Global Health Research and Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1186/s41256-024-00387-6
Gabriel Kalombe Kyomba, Michael Robert Law, Karen Ann Grépin, Serge Manitu Mayaka, Thérèse Nyangi-Mondo Mambu, Branly Kilola Mbunga, Celestin Hategeka, Mala Ali Mapatano, Joël Nkiama-Numbi Konde, Dosithée Ngo-Bebe, Pélagie Diambalula Babakazo, Eric Musalu Mafuta, Guillaume Mbela Kiyombo
{"title":"2018-2020 年刚果民主共和国埃博拉疫情爆发期间,非埃博拉患者利用医疗设施的障碍和促进因素。","authors":"Gabriel Kalombe Kyomba, Michael Robert Law, Karen Ann Grépin, Serge Manitu Mayaka, Thérèse Nyangi-Mondo Mambu, Branly Kilola Mbunga, Celestin Hategeka, Mala Ali Mapatano, Joël Nkiama-Numbi Konde, Dosithée Ngo-Bebe, Pélagie Diambalula Babakazo, Eric Musalu Mafuta, Guillaume Mbela Kiyombo","doi":"10.1186/s41256-024-00387-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak occurred in North Kivu between 2018 and 2020. This eastern province of the Democratic Republic of Congo was also grappling with insecurity caused by several armed groups. This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to utilizing Healthcare Facilities (HCFs) by non-Ebola patients during the crisis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative case study was conducted in Beni and Butembo with 24 relatives of 15 deceased non-EVD patients, 47 key informants from healthcare workers (HCWs), as well as community leaders. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore three key areas: (i) the participants' illness history, care pathway, care, and social support; (ii) their perceptions of how EVD affected the care outcome; and (iii) their opinions on the preparedness, supply, use, and quality of healthcare before and during the outbreak. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed using Atlas-ti 8.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine of the 15 deaths were female and their ages ranged from 7 to 79 years. The causes of death were non-communicable (13) or infectious (2) diseases. Conspiracy theories, failure to establish security, and the concept of the ''Ebola business'' were associated with misinformation and lower levels of trust in government and HCFs. The negative perceptions, fear of being identified as an Ebola case, apprehension about the triage unit, and inadequacy of personal protective equipment resulted in a preference for private or informal HCFs. For half of the deceased's relatives, the Ebola outbreak hastened their death. Conversely, community involvement, employing familiar, neutral, and credible HCWs, and implementing a free care policy increased the number of visits. These results were observable despite a lack of funds, overstretched HCWs, and long waiting time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings can inform policies before and during future outbreaks to enhance the resilience of routine HCFs by maintaining dialogue between HCWs and patients, and rebuilding confidence in HCFs. Quantitative studies including context analysis are essential to identify the determinants of care-seeking during such a crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":52405,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Research and Policy","volume":"9 1","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators to healthcare facility utilization by non-Ebola patients during the 2018-2020 Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Kalombe Kyomba, Michael Robert Law, Karen Ann Grépin, Serge Manitu Mayaka, Thérèse Nyangi-Mondo Mambu, Branly Kilola Mbunga, Celestin Hategeka, Mala Ali Mapatano, Joël Nkiama-Numbi Konde, Dosithée Ngo-Bebe, Pélagie Diambalula Babakazo, Eric Musalu Mafuta, Guillaume Mbela Kiyombo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41256-024-00387-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak occurred in North Kivu between 2018 and 2020. This eastern province of the Democratic Republic of Congo was also grappling with insecurity caused by several armed groups. This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to utilizing Healthcare Facilities (HCFs) by non-Ebola patients during the crisis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative case study was conducted in Beni and Butembo with 24 relatives of 15 deceased non-EVD patients, 47 key informants from healthcare workers (HCWs), as well as community leaders. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore three key areas: (i) the participants' illness history, care pathway, care, and social support; (ii) their perceptions of how EVD affected the care outcome; and (iii) their opinions on the preparedness, supply, use, and quality of healthcare before and during the outbreak. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed using Atlas-ti 8.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine of the 15 deaths were female and their ages ranged from 7 to 79 years. The causes of death were non-communicable (13) or infectious (2) diseases. Conspiracy theories, failure to establish security, and the concept of the ''Ebola business'' were associated with misinformation and lower levels of trust in government and HCFs. The negative perceptions, fear of being identified as an Ebola case, apprehension about the triage unit, and inadequacy of personal protective equipment resulted in a preference for private or informal HCFs. For half of the deceased's relatives, the Ebola outbreak hastened their death. Conversely, community involvement, employing familiar, neutral, and credible HCWs, and implementing a free care policy increased the number of visits. These results were observable despite a lack of funds, overstretched HCWs, and long waiting time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings can inform policies before and during future outbreaks to enhance the resilience of routine HCFs by maintaining dialogue between HCWs and patients, and rebuilding confidence in HCFs. Quantitative studies including context analysis are essential to identify the determinants of care-seeking during such a crisis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Research and Policy\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575170/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Research and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-024-00387-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-024-00387-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2018 年至 2020 年期间,北基伍省爆发了埃博拉病毒病(EVD)疫情。刚果民主共和国的这个东部省份还面临着多个武装团体造成的不安全局势。本研究旨在探讨非埃博拉患者在危机期间利用医疗保健设施(HCF)的障碍和促进因素:在贝尼和布滕博开展了一项定性案例研究,研究对象包括 15 名已故非埃博拉患者的 24 名亲属、47 名医疗保健工作者(HCWs)的关键信息提供者以及社区领袖。研究人员进行了半结构式访谈,以探讨三个关键领域:(i) 参与者的病史、护理途径、护理和社会支持;(ii) 他们对 EVD 如何影响护理结果的看法;以及 (iii) 他们对疫情爆发前和爆发期间医疗保健的准备、供应、使用和质量的看法。所有访谈均进行了录音、逐字记录,并使用 Atlas-ti 8.0 进行了主题分析:15 名死亡者中有 9 名女性,年龄从 7 岁到 79 岁不等。死亡原因为非传染性疾病(13 例)或传染性疾病(2 例)。阴谋论、未能建立安全保障以及 "埃博拉事业 "的概念与错误信息以及对政府和人道主义社区基金会的信任度较低有关。负面观念、害怕被确认为埃博拉病例、对分诊室的担忧以及个人防护设备的不足导致人们倾向于选择私人或非正规的医疗机构。对半数死者亲属而言,埃博拉疫情加速了他们的死亡。相反,社区参与、聘用熟悉、中立和可信的医护人员以及实施免费护理政策则增加了就诊人数。尽管缺乏资金、医护人员捉襟见肘且等待时间较长,但这些结果仍是可以观察到的:我们的研究结果可为未来疫情爆发前和爆发期间的政策提供参考,从而通过保持医护人员与患者之间的对话以及重建对医护人员的信心来增强常规保健设施的复原力。包括背景分析在内的定量研究对于确定危机期间寻求护理的决定因素至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers and facilitators to healthcare facility utilization by non-Ebola patients during the 2018-2020 Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Background: An Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak occurred in North Kivu between 2018 and 2020. This eastern province of the Democratic Republic of Congo was also grappling with insecurity caused by several armed groups. This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to utilizing Healthcare Facilities (HCFs) by non-Ebola patients during the crisis.

Methods: A qualitative case study was conducted in Beni and Butembo with 24 relatives of 15 deceased non-EVD patients, 47 key informants from healthcare workers (HCWs), as well as community leaders. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore three key areas: (i) the participants' illness history, care pathway, care, and social support; (ii) their perceptions of how EVD affected the care outcome; and (iii) their opinions on the preparedness, supply, use, and quality of healthcare before and during the outbreak. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed using Atlas-ti 8.0.

Results: Nine of the 15 deaths were female and their ages ranged from 7 to 79 years. The causes of death were non-communicable (13) or infectious (2) diseases. Conspiracy theories, failure to establish security, and the concept of the ''Ebola business'' were associated with misinformation and lower levels of trust in government and HCFs. The negative perceptions, fear of being identified as an Ebola case, apprehension about the triage unit, and inadequacy of personal protective equipment resulted in a preference for private or informal HCFs. For half of the deceased's relatives, the Ebola outbreak hastened their death. Conversely, community involvement, employing familiar, neutral, and credible HCWs, and implementing a free care policy increased the number of visits. These results were observable despite a lack of funds, overstretched HCWs, and long waiting time.

Conclusions: Our findings can inform policies before and during future outbreaks to enhance the resilience of routine HCFs by maintaining dialogue between HCWs and patients, and rebuilding confidence in HCFs. Quantitative studies including context analysis are essential to identify the determinants of care-seeking during such a crisis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Research and Policy
Global Health Research and Policy Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Research and Policy, an open-access, multidisciplinary journal, publishes research on various aspects of global health, addressing topics like health equity, health systems and policy, social determinants of health, disease burden, population health, and other urgent global health issues. It serves as a forum for high-quality research focused on regional and global health improvement, emphasizing solutions for health equity.
期刊最新文献
How the U.S. presidential election impacts global health: governance, funding, and beyond. Barriers and facilitators to healthcare facility utilization by non-Ebola patients during the 2018-2020 Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Impact of access to coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention on in-hospital and five-year mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a propensity-matched cohort study in Thailand. Prevalence of potential drug‒drug interactions and associated factors among elderly patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. El Niño southern oscillation, weather patterns, and bacillary dysentery in the Yangtze River Basin, China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1