Andrew Steffensmeier, Elijah Auch, Henry Haley, Kevin Farley, Donald Knapke
{"title":"门诊同步双侧单室膝关节置换术:安全且患者报告结果良好","authors":"Andrew Steffensmeier, Elijah Auch, Henry Haley, Kevin Farley, Donald Knapke","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bUKA) done on the same day (simultaneous) (sbUKA) has been shown to be safe and cost-effective in hospital settings. Given the popularity and increased use of ambulatory surgery centers (ASC), the purpose of this study was to compare safety and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of sbUKA done at the hospital versus ASC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive primary sbUKAs over 5 years done by a single surgeon were retrospectively collected. Surgeries were done at a hospital or ASC. Baseline demographics, intraoperative and postoperative results, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-jr) patient-reported outcome scores were collected between the two groups. Groups were compared utilizing Student's unpaired t-tests for continuous variables and χ2 tests for categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 146 patients (292 knees) who underwent sbUKA, 90 were done at a hospital, and 56 were done at an ASC. Length of stay was longer (53 versus five hours, P < 0.001), and operative time was longer (82 versus 68 minutes, P < 0.001) in the hospital group. In the hospital group, 11 (12.2%) were discharged to subacute rehab (SAR) and nine (10%) returned to the emergency department (ED) within 120 days compared to zero patients in the ASC group (P = 0.007 and 0.015, respectively). There was no significant difference in the final range of motion nor KOOS-jr scores postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outpatient SbUKA can safely be performed in selected patients. There is no difference in functional outcomes between outpatient and inpatient SbUKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outpatient Simultaneous Bilateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties: Safe with Positive Patient-Reported Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Steffensmeier, Elijah Auch, Henry Haley, Kevin Farley, Donald Knapke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bUKA) done on the same day (simultaneous) (sbUKA) has been shown to be safe and cost-effective in hospital settings. Given the popularity and increased use of ambulatory surgery centers (ASC), the purpose of this study was to compare safety and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of sbUKA done at the hospital versus ASC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive primary sbUKAs over 5 years done by a single surgeon were retrospectively collected. Surgeries were done at a hospital or ASC. Baseline demographics, intraoperative and postoperative results, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-jr) patient-reported outcome scores were collected between the two groups. Groups were compared utilizing Student's unpaired t-tests for continuous variables and χ2 tests for categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 146 patients (292 knees) who underwent sbUKA, 90 were done at a hospital, and 56 were done at an ASC. Length of stay was longer (53 versus five hours, P < 0.001), and operative time was longer (82 versus 68 minutes, P < 0.001) in the hospital group. In the hospital group, 11 (12.2%) were discharged to subacute rehab (SAR) and nine (10%) returned to the emergency department (ED) within 120 days compared to zero patients in the ASC group (P = 0.007 and 0.015, respectively). There was no significant difference in the final range of motion nor KOOS-jr scores postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outpatient SbUKA can safely be performed in selected patients. There is no difference in functional outcomes between outpatient and inpatient SbUKA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.030\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bUKA) done on the same day (simultaneous) (sbUKA) has been shown to be safe and cost-effective in hospital settings. Given the popularity and increased use of ambulatory surgery centers (ASC), the purpose of this study was to compare safety and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of sbUKA done at the hospital versus ASC.
Methods: Consecutive primary sbUKAs over 5 years done by a single surgeon were retrospectively collected. Surgeries were done at a hospital or ASC. Baseline demographics, intraoperative and postoperative results, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-jr) patient-reported outcome scores were collected between the two groups. Groups were compared utilizing Student's unpaired t-tests for continuous variables and χ2 tests for categorical variables.
Results: Of 146 patients (292 knees) who underwent sbUKA, 90 were done at a hospital, and 56 were done at an ASC. Length of stay was longer (53 versus five hours, P < 0.001), and operative time was longer (82 versus 68 minutes, P < 0.001) in the hospital group. In the hospital group, 11 (12.2%) were discharged to subacute rehab (SAR) and nine (10%) returned to the emergency department (ED) within 120 days compared to zero patients in the ASC group (P = 0.007 and 0.015, respectively). There was no significant difference in the final range of motion nor KOOS-jr scores postoperatively.
Conclusion: Outpatient SbUKA can safely be performed in selected patients. There is no difference in functional outcomes between outpatient and inpatient SbUKA.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.