为在线身份验证系统的通用设计提出建议。

Helen Petrie, Suzanna Schmeelk
{"title":"为在线身份验证系统的通用设计提出建议。","authors":"Helen Petrie, Suzanna Schmeelk","doi":"10.3233/SHTI241036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing body of research on the problems older and disabled people face with authentication systems and a range of solutions have been developed. However, this research has not been integrated across user groups and solutions usually only target one or two groups. This research has attempted to integrate the empirical research findings across studies conducted with people with visual, physical, and intellectual disabilities, people dyslexia and older people. It proposes an initial set of 15 recommendations for the universal design of authentication systems. Four recommendations are about authentication systems in general, six about password authentication, two about CAPTCHAs and three about biometric authentication. 40% of the recommendations address problems experienced by at least two different user groups and over 25% address problems experienced by three groups. However, much further work is needed to validate and refine the recommendations and integrate them into a universal design approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"320 ","pages":"420-427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Recommendations for the Universal Design of Online Authentication Systems.\",\"authors\":\"Helen Petrie, Suzanna Schmeelk\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/SHTI241036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a growing body of research on the problems older and disabled people face with authentication systems and a range of solutions have been developed. However, this research has not been integrated across user groups and solutions usually only target one or two groups. This research has attempted to integrate the empirical research findings across studies conducted with people with visual, physical, and intellectual disabilities, people dyslexia and older people. It proposes an initial set of 15 recommendations for the universal design of authentication systems. Four recommendations are about authentication systems in general, six about password authentication, two about CAPTCHAs and three about biometric authentication. 40% of the recommendations address problems experienced by at least two different user groups and over 25% address problems experienced by three groups. However, much further work is needed to validate and refine the recommendations and integrate them into a universal design approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in health technology and informatics\",\"volume\":\"320 \",\"pages\":\"420-427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in health technology and informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI241036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI241036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于老年人和残疾人在使用身份验证系统时所面临问题的研究越来越多,并已开发出一系列解决方案。然而,这些研究并没有整合到不同的用户群体中,而且解决方案通常只针对一两个群体。本研究试图整合针对视力、身体和智力残疾者、阅读障碍者和老年人的实证研究成果。它为身份验证系统的通用设计提出了 15 项初步建议。其中四项建议涉及一般身份验证系统,六项涉及密码身份验证,两项涉及验证码,三项涉及生物识别身份验证。40% 的建议解决了至少两个不同用户群体遇到的问题,超过 25% 的建议解决了三个群体遇到的问题。不过,要验证和完善这些建议并将其纳入通用设计方法,还需要做大量的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards Recommendations for the Universal Design of Online Authentication Systems.

There is a growing body of research on the problems older and disabled people face with authentication systems and a range of solutions have been developed. However, this research has not been integrated across user groups and solutions usually only target one or two groups. This research has attempted to integrate the empirical research findings across studies conducted with people with visual, physical, and intellectual disabilities, people dyslexia and older people. It proposes an initial set of 15 recommendations for the universal design of authentication systems. Four recommendations are about authentication systems in general, six about password authentication, two about CAPTCHAs and three about biometric authentication. 40% of the recommendations address problems experienced by at least two different user groups and over 25% address problems experienced by three groups. However, much further work is needed to validate and refine the recommendations and integrate them into a universal design approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Service Thinking in Architectural Design for Dementia in the Finnish Context. Shaping the Typology of Modern Finnish Psychiatric Hospitals: Analyzing Design Briefs of Two Case Studies. Soundscape Augmentation in Dementia Care Design; Need for a Guideline. Stand(ing)still?! Exploring Motion Affordances in Learning Environments as a Lever for Better Motor Skills in Youngsters. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Journey of an Architect-Researcher in Palliative Environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1