产前接触住宅绿化、胎儿生长和出生结果:纽约市的一项队列研究。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwae436
Seulkee Heo, Yelena Afanasyeva, Mengling Liu, Shilpi Mehta-Lee, Wenqing Yang, Leonardo Trasande, Michelle L Bell, Akhgar Ghassabian
{"title":"产前接触住宅绿化、胎儿生长和出生结果:纽约市的一项队列研究。","authors":"Seulkee Heo, Yelena Afanasyeva, Mengling Liu, Shilpi Mehta-Lee, Wenqing Yang, Leonardo Trasande, Michelle L Bell, Akhgar Ghassabian","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Findings for greenspace's impacts on birth outcomes are largely dependent on vegetation indexes. Examinations are needed for various greenspace indicators given varying pathways for fetal development. This prospective cohort study assessed the impacts of prenatal greenspace exposure on preterm birth (PTB), term low birthweight (TLBW), birthweight, and estimated fetal weight (EFW) for pregnant women in the New York City area, 2016-2023 (n=2765). Longitudinal greenspace exposure was measured for residential histories during pregnancy using the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) for 1000m buffers and four park metrics, namely, the total number, sum of area, and the accessibility of parks within residential buffers (500 m) and the distance to the closest park. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate the associations for quartiles of exposure (with the first quartile [Q1] as reference). Greenspace exposure was not associated with TLBW, birthweight, or EFW. Odds ratios of PTB for the Q2, Q3, and Q4 EVI exposure groups compared to the Q1 group were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.43-0.98), 0.51 (0.32-0.80), and 0.56 (0.35-0.90), respectively. PTB risks decreased in higher exposure groups (Q2-Q4) of the total park number. Results indicate the benefits of prenatal greenspace exposure for fetal maturity and neonatal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prenatal exposure to residential greenness, fetal growth, and birth outcomes: a cohort study in New York City.\",\"authors\":\"Seulkee Heo, Yelena Afanasyeva, Mengling Liu, Shilpi Mehta-Lee, Wenqing Yang, Leonardo Trasande, Michelle L Bell, Akhgar Ghassabian\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aje/kwae436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Findings for greenspace's impacts on birth outcomes are largely dependent on vegetation indexes. Examinations are needed for various greenspace indicators given varying pathways for fetal development. This prospective cohort study assessed the impacts of prenatal greenspace exposure on preterm birth (PTB), term low birthweight (TLBW), birthweight, and estimated fetal weight (EFW) for pregnant women in the New York City area, 2016-2023 (n=2765). Longitudinal greenspace exposure was measured for residential histories during pregnancy using the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) for 1000m buffers and four park metrics, namely, the total number, sum of area, and the accessibility of parks within residential buffers (500 m) and the distance to the closest park. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate the associations for quartiles of exposure (with the first quartile [Q1] as reference). Greenspace exposure was not associated with TLBW, birthweight, or EFW. Odds ratios of PTB for the Q2, Q3, and Q4 EVI exposure groups compared to the Q1 group were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.43-0.98), 0.51 (0.32-0.80), and 0.56 (0.35-0.90), respectively. PTB risks decreased in higher exposure groups (Q2-Q4) of the total park number. Results indicate the benefits of prenatal greenspace exposure for fetal maturity and neonatal outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae436\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绿地对出生结果的影响主要取决于植被指数。鉴于胎儿发育的途径不同,需要对各种绿地指标进行检验。这项前瞻性队列研究评估了 2016-2023 年纽约市地区孕妇产前绿地暴露对早产(PTB)、过期低出生体重(TLBW)、出生体重和估计胎儿体重(EFW)的影响(n=2765)。利用1000米缓冲区的增强植被指数(EVI)和四项公园指标,即住宅缓冲区(500米)内公园的总数、面积总和、可进入性以及到最近公园的距离,测量怀孕期间住宅历史的纵向绿地暴露。多变量回归模型用于估算四分位数暴露量(以第一四分位数[Q1]为参考)的相关性。绿地暴露与TLBW、出生体重或EFW无关。与 Q1 组相比,Q2、Q3 和 Q4 EVI 暴露组的 PTB 比值分别为 0.65(95% CI:0.43-0.98)、0.51(0.32-0.80)和 0.56(0.35-0.90)。在公园总人数中,较高接触组(Q2-Q4)的 PTB 风险降低。结果表明,产前接触绿地对胎儿成熟和新生儿结局有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prenatal exposure to residential greenness, fetal growth, and birth outcomes: a cohort study in New York City.

Findings for greenspace's impacts on birth outcomes are largely dependent on vegetation indexes. Examinations are needed for various greenspace indicators given varying pathways for fetal development. This prospective cohort study assessed the impacts of prenatal greenspace exposure on preterm birth (PTB), term low birthweight (TLBW), birthweight, and estimated fetal weight (EFW) for pregnant women in the New York City area, 2016-2023 (n=2765). Longitudinal greenspace exposure was measured for residential histories during pregnancy using the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) for 1000m buffers and four park metrics, namely, the total number, sum of area, and the accessibility of parks within residential buffers (500 m) and the distance to the closest park. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate the associations for quartiles of exposure (with the first quartile [Q1] as reference). Greenspace exposure was not associated with TLBW, birthweight, or EFW. Odds ratios of PTB for the Q2, Q3, and Q4 EVI exposure groups compared to the Q1 group were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.43-0.98), 0.51 (0.32-0.80), and 0.56 (0.35-0.90), respectively. PTB risks decreased in higher exposure groups (Q2-Q4) of the total park number. Results indicate the benefits of prenatal greenspace exposure for fetal maturity and neonatal outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Editorial consultants 1. Characterizing state-level structural cisheterosexism trajectories using sequence and cluster analysis, 1996-2016, 50 U.S. states and Washington, D.C., and associations with health status and healthcare outcomes. Association of Discrimination Experiences with Rapid Subsequent Changes in Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in U.S. Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Prenatal exposure to residential greenness, fetal growth, and birth outcomes: a cohort study in New York City. Race adjustment hides and perpetuates systemic racism: Real world example using life tables.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1