Damien Luque Paz, Nico Gagelmann, Lina Benajiba, Jérémie Riou, Rachel B Salit, Corentin Orvain, Thomas Schroeder, Claire Bories, Carmelo Gurnari, Anita Badbaran, Francoise Boyer-Perrard, Simona Pagliuca, Christina Rautenberg, Suzanne Tavitian, Victoria Panagiota, Jean-Christophe Ianotto, Felicitas R Thol, Emilie Cayssials, Michael Heuser, Marie-Therese Rubio, Bruno Cassinat, Rafael Daltro de Oliveira, Craig S Sauter, Jaroslaw P Maciejewski, Hans Christian Reinhardt, Bart L Scott, Valérie Ugo, Nicolaus Kröger, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Marie Robin
{"title":"分子改变在原发性骨髓纤维化患者移植决定中的作用。","authors":"Damien Luque Paz, Nico Gagelmann, Lina Benajiba, Jérémie Riou, Rachel B Salit, Corentin Orvain, Thomas Schroeder, Claire Bories, Carmelo Gurnari, Anita Badbaran, Francoise Boyer-Perrard, Simona Pagliuca, Christina Rautenberg, Suzanne Tavitian, Victoria Panagiota, Jean-Christophe Ianotto, Felicitas R Thol, Emilie Cayssials, Michael Heuser, Marie-Therese Rubio, Bruno Cassinat, Rafael Daltro de Oliveira, Craig S Sauter, Jaroslaw P Maciejewski, Hans Christian Reinhardt, Bart L Scott, Valérie Ugo, Nicolaus Kröger, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Marie Robin","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of our study was to analyze the potential survival benefit associated with HSCT according to clinico-biological scores which incorporate molecular data (MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+V2) to facilitate decision-making in this context. One transplant (n=241) and one non-transplant cohorts (n=239) were used to test the hypothesis that PMF patients with higher risk molecular score benefit from HSCT. A weighted propensity score was applied to balance confounding factors with the transplanted cohort as reference. Weighted Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regression analyses were performed. 105 non-transplanted patients could be matched to the 239 transplanted patients. Mean age in transplanted and non-transplanted matched patients was 55.5 and 57.9 years. Blood cell count and DIPSS score distribution were similar in both groups. HSCT was associated with a higher 6-year OS rate in intermediate-2 (60.1% versus 41.5%) and high-risk DIPSS patients (44.4% versus 6.55%), high-risk MIPSS70 (46.5 versus 23.9%), high-risk (73.2% versus 39.7%) or very high-risk MIPSS70V2 (51.8% versus 24%). Intermediate MIPSS70 patients have an advantage of survival with HSCT only when their MTSS were low or intermediate. Transplanted patients had an increased mortality risk the first year but a significant benefit with HSCT after the one-year landmark was observed in higher risk patients. This study confirms that similar to DIPSS, MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+V2 risk score in addition to MTSS can be used to determine which patients with primary myelofibrosis have survival benefit from HSCT over non-HSCT strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of molecular alterations in transplantation decisions for patients with primary myelofibrosis.\",\"authors\":\"Damien Luque Paz, Nico Gagelmann, Lina Benajiba, Jérémie Riou, Rachel B Salit, Corentin Orvain, Thomas Schroeder, Claire Bories, Carmelo Gurnari, Anita Badbaran, Francoise Boyer-Perrard, Simona Pagliuca, Christina Rautenberg, Suzanne Tavitian, Victoria Panagiota, Jean-Christophe Ianotto, Felicitas R Thol, Emilie Cayssials, Michael Heuser, Marie-Therese Rubio, Bruno Cassinat, Rafael Daltro de Oliveira, Craig S Sauter, Jaroslaw P Maciejewski, Hans Christian Reinhardt, Bart L Scott, Valérie Ugo, Nicolaus Kröger, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Marie Robin\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of our study was to analyze the potential survival benefit associated with HSCT according to clinico-biological scores which incorporate molecular data (MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+V2) to facilitate decision-making in this context. One transplant (n=241) and one non-transplant cohorts (n=239) were used to test the hypothesis that PMF patients with higher risk molecular score benefit from HSCT. A weighted propensity score was applied to balance confounding factors with the transplanted cohort as reference. Weighted Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regression analyses were performed. 105 non-transplanted patients could be matched to the 239 transplanted patients. Mean age in transplanted and non-transplanted matched patients was 55.5 and 57.9 years. Blood cell count and DIPSS score distribution were similar in both groups. HSCT was associated with a higher 6-year OS rate in intermediate-2 (60.1% versus 41.5%) and high-risk DIPSS patients (44.4% versus 6.55%), high-risk MIPSS70 (46.5 versus 23.9%), high-risk (73.2% versus 39.7%) or very high-risk MIPSS70V2 (51.8% versus 24%). Intermediate MIPSS70 patients have an advantage of survival with HSCT only when their MTSS were low or intermediate. Transplanted patients had an increased mortality risk the first year but a significant benefit with HSCT after the one-year landmark was observed in higher risk patients. This study confirms that similar to DIPSS, MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+V2 risk score in addition to MTSS can be used to determine which patients with primary myelofibrosis have survival benefit from HSCT over non-HSCT strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014368\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014368","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Role of molecular alterations in transplantation decisions for patients with primary myelofibrosis.
The aim of our study was to analyze the potential survival benefit associated with HSCT according to clinico-biological scores which incorporate molecular data (MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+V2) to facilitate decision-making in this context. One transplant (n=241) and one non-transplant cohorts (n=239) were used to test the hypothesis that PMF patients with higher risk molecular score benefit from HSCT. A weighted propensity score was applied to balance confounding factors with the transplanted cohort as reference. Weighted Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regression analyses were performed. 105 non-transplanted patients could be matched to the 239 transplanted patients. Mean age in transplanted and non-transplanted matched patients was 55.5 and 57.9 years. Blood cell count and DIPSS score distribution were similar in both groups. HSCT was associated with a higher 6-year OS rate in intermediate-2 (60.1% versus 41.5%) and high-risk DIPSS patients (44.4% versus 6.55%), high-risk MIPSS70 (46.5 versus 23.9%), high-risk (73.2% versus 39.7%) or very high-risk MIPSS70V2 (51.8% versus 24%). Intermediate MIPSS70 patients have an advantage of survival with HSCT only when their MTSS were low or intermediate. Transplanted patients had an increased mortality risk the first year but a significant benefit with HSCT after the one-year landmark was observed in higher risk patients. This study confirms that similar to DIPSS, MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+V2 risk score in addition to MTSS can be used to determine which patients with primary myelofibrosis have survival benefit from HSCT over non-HSCT strategies.
期刊介绍:
Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016.
Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.