利用倾向得分匹配法比较分析三联疗法和根治性膀胱切除术对肌层浸润性膀胱癌的肿瘤治疗效果。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Japanese journal of clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1093/jjco/hyae164
Keita Kobayashi, Nakanori Fujii, Kosuke Shimizu, Yukihiro Hitaka, Shintaro Oka, Kimihiko Nakamura, Toshiya Hiroyoshi, Naohito Isoyama, Hiroshi Hirata, Koji Shiraishi
{"title":"利用倾向得分匹配法比较分析三联疗法和根治性膀胱切除术对肌层浸润性膀胱癌的肿瘤治疗效果。","authors":"Keita Kobayashi, Nakanori Fujii, Kosuke Shimizu, Yukihiro Hitaka, Shintaro Oka, Kimihiko Nakamura, Toshiya Hiroyoshi, Naohito Isoyama, Hiroshi Hirata, Koji Shiraishi","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyae164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bladder preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is reported to yield outcomes comparable to those of radical cystectomy, although it receives a relatively low recommendation grade in Japanese guidelines. This study aims to compare the outcomes of trimodal therapy versus radical cystectomy in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a single-center retrospective analysis that included patients treated with either trimodal therapy or radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (cT2-4N0-2M0) at our institution between January 1998 and December 2022. Trimodal therapy is administered in cases where radical cystectomy is either unfeasible or declined by the patient, and both treatments are performed with the intent of curative outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to compare cancer-specific survival and overall survival rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 93 patients who underwent trimodal therapy and 84 who underwent radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer were analyzed. Using propensity score matching, 66 patients from each treatment group were selected for a comparative analysis of oncological outcomes. The 5-year distant metastasis-free, cancer-specific and overall survival rates were 64.3 and 51.8% (P = 0.096), 83.3 and 69.2% (P = 0.104) and 77.8 and 64.2% (P = 0.274) for trimodal therapy and radical cystectomy, respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed that trimodal therapy for primary tumors significantly improved cancer-specific survival rates compared with radical cystectomy. The two treatment types had similar adverse events related to hematologic toxicity during perioperative chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trimodal therapy exhibited oncological outcomes comparable to those of radical cystectomy in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, indicating that trimodal therapy provides favorable outcomes, particularly in cases of primary muscle-invasive bladder cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of oncological outcomes between trimodal therapy and radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer utilizing propensity score matching.\",\"authors\":\"Keita Kobayashi, Nakanori Fujii, Kosuke Shimizu, Yukihiro Hitaka, Shintaro Oka, Kimihiko Nakamura, Toshiya Hiroyoshi, Naohito Isoyama, Hiroshi Hirata, Koji Shiraishi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jjco/hyae164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bladder preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is reported to yield outcomes comparable to those of radical cystectomy, although it receives a relatively low recommendation grade in Japanese guidelines. This study aims to compare the outcomes of trimodal therapy versus radical cystectomy in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a single-center retrospective analysis that included patients treated with either trimodal therapy or radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (cT2-4N0-2M0) at our institution between January 1998 and December 2022. Trimodal therapy is administered in cases where radical cystectomy is either unfeasible or declined by the patient, and both treatments are performed with the intent of curative outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to compare cancer-specific survival and overall survival rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 93 patients who underwent trimodal therapy and 84 who underwent radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer were analyzed. Using propensity score matching, 66 patients from each treatment group were selected for a comparative analysis of oncological outcomes. The 5-year distant metastasis-free, cancer-specific and overall survival rates were 64.3 and 51.8% (P = 0.096), 83.3 and 69.2% (P = 0.104) and 77.8 and 64.2% (P = 0.274) for trimodal therapy and radical cystectomy, respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed that trimodal therapy for primary tumors significantly improved cancer-specific survival rates compared with radical cystectomy. The two treatment types had similar adverse events related to hematologic toxicity during perioperative chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trimodal therapy exhibited oncological outcomes comparable to those of radical cystectomy in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, indicating that trimodal therapy provides favorable outcomes, particularly in cases of primary muscle-invasive bladder cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyae164\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyae164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据报道,肌层浸润性膀胱癌的膀胱保留疗法与根治性膀胱切除术的疗效相当,但在日本指南中的推荐等级相对较低。本研究旨在比较三联疗法与根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的疗效:本研究是一项单中心回顾性分析,纳入了1998年1月至2022年12月期间在我院接受三联疗法或根治性膀胱切除术治疗的肌层浸润性膀胱癌(cT2-4N0-2M0)患者。三联疗法适用于无法实施根治性膀胱切除术或患者拒绝接受根治性膀胱切除术的病例,两种疗法均以治愈为目的。采用倾向得分匹配法比较癌症特异性生存率和总生存率:共分析了93名接受三联疗法的患者和84名接受根治性膀胱切除术的肌浸润性膀胱癌患者。通过倾向评分匹配,从每个治疗组中选择了 66 名患者进行肿瘤结果比较分析。三联疗法和根治性膀胱切除术的5年无远处转移生存率、癌症特异性生存率和总生存率分别为64.3%和51.8%(P = 0.096)、83.3%和69.2%(P = 0.104)以及77.8%和64.2%(P = 0.274)。亚组分析显示,与根治性膀胱切除术相比,原发性肿瘤的三联疗法能显著提高癌症特异性生存率。两种疗法在围手术期化疗期间发生的与血液学毒性相关的不良事件相似:结论:在治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌时,三联疗法的肿瘤治疗效果与根治性膀胱切除术相当,这表明三联疗法可提供良好的治疗效果,尤其是在原发性肌层浸润性膀胱癌病例中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of oncological outcomes between trimodal therapy and radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer utilizing propensity score matching.

Background: Bladder preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is reported to yield outcomes comparable to those of radical cystectomy, although it receives a relatively low recommendation grade in Japanese guidelines. This study aims to compare the outcomes of trimodal therapy versus radical cystectomy in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Methods: This study is a single-center retrospective analysis that included patients treated with either trimodal therapy or radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (cT2-4N0-2M0) at our institution between January 1998 and December 2022. Trimodal therapy is administered in cases where radical cystectomy is either unfeasible or declined by the patient, and both treatments are performed with the intent of curative outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to compare cancer-specific survival and overall survival rates.

Results: A total of 93 patients who underwent trimodal therapy and 84 who underwent radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer were analyzed. Using propensity score matching, 66 patients from each treatment group were selected for a comparative analysis of oncological outcomes. The 5-year distant metastasis-free, cancer-specific and overall survival rates were 64.3 and 51.8% (P = 0.096), 83.3 and 69.2% (P = 0.104) and 77.8 and 64.2% (P = 0.274) for trimodal therapy and radical cystectomy, respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed that trimodal therapy for primary tumors significantly improved cancer-specific survival rates compared with radical cystectomy. The two treatment types had similar adverse events related to hematologic toxicity during perioperative chemotherapy.

Conclusion: Trimodal therapy exhibited oncological outcomes comparable to those of radical cystectomy in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, indicating that trimodal therapy provides favorable outcomes, particularly in cases of primary muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region. JJCO publishes various articles types including: ・Original Articles ・Case Reports ・Clinical Trial Notes ・Cancer Genetics Reports ・Epidemiology Notes ・Technical Notes ・Short Communications ・Letters to the Editors ・Solicited Reviews
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of oncological outcomes between trimodal therapy and radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer utilizing propensity score matching. Individual survival prediction model for patients with leptomeningeal metastasis. Authors' reply to 'RE: A real-world survey on expensive drugs used as first-line chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative unresectable advanced/recurrent gastric cancer in the stomach cancer study group of the Japan clinical oncology group'. Predictors of nodal upstaging in clinical N1 nonsmall cell lung cancer. Correction to: Impact of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) on spleen volume in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1