与根治性前列腺切除术后并发症相关的解剖因素:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY European urology oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2024.10.018
Arthur Peyrottes, Charles Dariane, Michael Baboudjian, Eric Barret, Laurent Brureau, Gaelle Fiard, Gaelle Fromont, Romain Mathieu, Jonathan Olivier, Raphaëlle Renard-Penna, Guilhem Roubaud, Morgan Rouprêt, Paul Sargos, Stéphane Supiot, Alexandre de la Taille, Léa Turpin, François Desgrandchamps, Guillaume Ploussard, Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
{"title":"与根治性前列腺切除术后并发症相关的解剖因素:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Arthur Peyrottes, Charles Dariane, Michael Baboudjian, Eric Barret, Laurent Brureau, Gaelle Fiard, Gaelle Fromont, Romain Mathieu, Jonathan Olivier, Raphaëlle Renard-Penna, Guilhem Roubaud, Morgan Rouprêt, Paul Sargos, Stéphane Supiot, Alexandre de la Taille, Léa Turpin, François Desgrandchamps, Guillaume Ploussard, Alexandra Masson-Lecomte","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.10.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The role of anatomical factors in predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains unclear. This review aims to evaluate the impact of various anatomical factors on the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing RP for localized prostate cancer (PCa).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted through January 2024 using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. Data were extracted and pooled for a meta-analysis, with outcomes including operative time, blood loss, transfusion rates, overall complications, and positive surgical margins (PSMs). Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane Q test, and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the influence of surgical approach.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>A total of 91 studies met our inclusion criteria. Among the anatomical factors, prostate volume (PV), prostate weight, and median lobe (ML) were suitable for the meta-analysis. Larger prostates were associated with increased operative time, blood loss, and complication rates, but with fewer PSMs (all p < 0.05). ML presence was not associated with a higher risk of complications. Heterogeneity was high across studies (Cochrane Q tests <0.05), reflecting inconsistent definitions and methods. In subgroup analyses, the open approach was associated with a longer operative time than robotic surgery for large prostates (p = 0.03) and a lower PSM rate (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Anatomical factors, particularly PV, play a significant role in RP outcomes. Larger prostates are associated with higher complication rates but fewer PSMs. Further research with standardized outcome measures is necessary to clarify these relationships and guide clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this study, we examined how a patient's individual anatomy might affect the results of prostate surgery for cancer. We found that larger prostates tend to lead to longer surgeries and increased blood loss, but these also have a lower risk of leaving cancer cells behind. These findings could help doctors in better planning surgeries and improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomic Factors Associated with Complications After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Arthur Peyrottes, Charles Dariane, Michael Baboudjian, Eric Barret, Laurent Brureau, Gaelle Fiard, Gaelle Fromont, Romain Mathieu, Jonathan Olivier, Raphaëlle Renard-Penna, Guilhem Roubaud, Morgan Rouprêt, Paul Sargos, Stéphane Supiot, Alexandre de la Taille, Léa Turpin, François Desgrandchamps, Guillaume Ploussard, Alexandra Masson-Lecomte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2024.10.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The role of anatomical factors in predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains unclear. This review aims to evaluate the impact of various anatomical factors on the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing RP for localized prostate cancer (PCa).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted through January 2024 using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. Data were extracted and pooled for a meta-analysis, with outcomes including operative time, blood loss, transfusion rates, overall complications, and positive surgical margins (PSMs). Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane Q test, and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the influence of surgical approach.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>A total of 91 studies met our inclusion criteria. Among the anatomical factors, prostate volume (PV), prostate weight, and median lobe (ML) were suitable for the meta-analysis. Larger prostates were associated with increased operative time, blood loss, and complication rates, but with fewer PSMs (all p < 0.05). ML presence was not associated with a higher risk of complications. Heterogeneity was high across studies (Cochrane Q tests <0.05), reflecting inconsistent definitions and methods. In subgroup analyses, the open approach was associated with a longer operative time than robotic surgery for large prostates (p = 0.03) and a lower PSM rate (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Anatomical factors, particularly PV, play a significant role in RP outcomes. Larger prostates are associated with higher complication rates but fewer PSMs. Further research with standardized outcome measures is necessary to clarify these relationships and guide clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this study, we examined how a patient's individual anatomy might affect the results of prostate surgery for cancer. We found that larger prostates tend to lead to longer surgeries and increased blood loss, but these also have a lower risk of leaving cancer cells behind. These findings could help doctors in better planning surgeries and improving patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.10.018\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.10.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:解剖因素在预测根治性前列腺切除术(RP)术后预后中的作用仍不明确。本综述旨在评估各种解剖因素对局部前列腺癌(PCa)根治术患者围手术期预后的影响:方法:使用 PubMed/Medline、Embase 和 Web of Science 数据库对截至 2024 年 1 月的文献进行了全面检索。在确定符合条件的研究时,遵循了《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南。提取并汇总数据进行荟萃分析,结果包括手术时间、失血量、输血率、总体并发症和手术切缘阳性(PSMs)。使用 Cochrane Q 检验评估异质性,并进行亚组分析以探讨手术方法的影响:共有 91 项研究符合我们的纳入标准。在解剖学因素中,前列腺体积(PV)、前列腺重量和中叶(ML)适合进行荟萃分析。前列腺体积越大,手术时间、失血量和并发症发生率越高,但前列腺增生症(PSM)发生率越低(均为 p 结论和临床影响):解剖因素,尤其是前列腺体积,在前列腺电切术的结果中起着重要作用。较大的前列腺与较高的并发症发生率有关,但 PSM 的发生率较低。有必要使用标准化的结果测量方法进行进一步研究,以明确这些关系并指导临床决策。患者总结:在这项研究中,我们探讨了患者的个体解剖结构如何影响前列腺癌手术的结果。我们发现,较大的前列腺往往会导致手术时间延长和失血量增加,但这些前列腺留下癌细胞的风险也较低。这些发现可以帮助医生更好地规划手术,改善患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anatomic Factors Associated with Complications After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background and objective: The role of anatomical factors in predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains unclear. This review aims to evaluate the impact of various anatomical factors on the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing RP for localized prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted through January 2024 using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. Data were extracted and pooled for a meta-analysis, with outcomes including operative time, blood loss, transfusion rates, overall complications, and positive surgical margins (PSMs). Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane Q test, and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the influence of surgical approach.

Key findings and limitations: A total of 91 studies met our inclusion criteria. Among the anatomical factors, prostate volume (PV), prostate weight, and median lobe (ML) were suitable for the meta-analysis. Larger prostates were associated with increased operative time, blood loss, and complication rates, but with fewer PSMs (all p < 0.05). ML presence was not associated with a higher risk of complications. Heterogeneity was high across studies (Cochrane Q tests <0.05), reflecting inconsistent definitions and methods. In subgroup analyses, the open approach was associated with a longer operative time than robotic surgery for large prostates (p = 0.03) and a lower PSM rate (p < 0.001).

Conclusions and clinical implications: Anatomical factors, particularly PV, play a significant role in RP outcomes. Larger prostates are associated with higher complication rates but fewer PSMs. Further research with standardized outcome measures is necessary to clarify these relationships and guide clinical decision-making.

Patient summary: In this study, we examined how a patient's individual anatomy might affect the results of prostate surgery for cancer. We found that larger prostates tend to lead to longer surgeries and increased blood loss, but these also have a lower risk of leaving cancer cells behind. These findings could help doctors in better planning surgeries and improving patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
期刊最新文献
Anatomic Factors Associated with Complications After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Repeat Prostate Cancer Screening using Blood-based Risk Prediction or Prostate-specific Antigen in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies : A Secondary Analysis of the STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial. A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning Models for the Automatic Detection, Localization, and Characterization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Colibactin Exerts Androgen-dependent and -independent Effects on Prostate Cancer. Combined Fixed-duration Systemic Treatment and Metastasis-directed Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1