Juan Felipe Abaunza-Camacho, Sara Gomez-Niebles, Humberto Madrinan-Navia, Rafael Aponte-Caballero, William Mauricio Riveros, Leonardo Laverde-Frade
{"title":"经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术后阿片类药物的使用:开放手术与微创手术的比较。","authors":"Juan Felipe Abaunza-Camacho, Sara Gomez-Niebles, Humberto Madrinan-Navia, Rafael Aponte-Caballero, William Mauricio Riveros, Leonardo Laverde-Frade","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1792141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Opioids are medications frequently used in patients with moderate and severe chronic pain. Their pharmacologic profile allows their use in acute severe postoperative pain. However, due to their highly addictive profile, opioid misuse is considered a public health issue. Vertebral spine fusion, decompression, and instrumentation are often associated with acute, severe postoperative pain. The present study aims to compare postoperative opioid consumption in a group of patients who underwent open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) against a similar group of patients who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MTLIF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We present a quantitative, observational, analytical, and historical cohort study. After convenience sampling, we identified 45 patients, 34 of whom underwent OTLIF and 11 underwent MTLIF. The analysis was made after measuring the following variables: demographics, type of surgery, length of stay, pain control, opioid type, and opioid dose. Statistical methods were implemented according to the origin and behavior of the variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> We found a difference between significant and nonsignificant pain among the groups with less opioid consumption in the MTILF group. This difference was seen in the frequency and dosage during all observation periods. However, in the postoperative observation, the frequencies and dosages were equal between groups. According to linear regression, the type of surgery, radiculopathy, and radiculitis explain the significant postoperative pain in up to 50% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Our study reveals a significant difference in opioid consumption between patients undergoing different surgical techniques. While these findings are valid for the studied population, the limitation in sample size highlights the need for further research. The implications of our findings on postoperative pain management and opioid use in spinal surgeries are significant and warrant continued investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opioid Use after Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Felipe Abaunza-Camacho, Sara Gomez-Niebles, Humberto Madrinan-Navia, Rafael Aponte-Caballero, William Mauricio Riveros, Leonardo Laverde-Frade\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1792141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Opioids are medications frequently used in patients with moderate and severe chronic pain. Their pharmacologic profile allows their use in acute severe postoperative pain. However, due to their highly addictive profile, opioid misuse is considered a public health issue. Vertebral spine fusion, decompression, and instrumentation are often associated with acute, severe postoperative pain. The present study aims to compare postoperative opioid consumption in a group of patients who underwent open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) against a similar group of patients who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MTLIF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We present a quantitative, observational, analytical, and historical cohort study. After convenience sampling, we identified 45 patients, 34 of whom underwent OTLIF and 11 underwent MTLIF. The analysis was made after measuring the following variables: demographics, type of surgery, length of stay, pain control, opioid type, and opioid dose. Statistical methods were implemented according to the origin and behavior of the variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> We found a difference between significant and nonsignificant pain among the groups with less opioid consumption in the MTILF group. This difference was seen in the frequency and dosage during all observation periods. However, in the postoperative observation, the frequencies and dosages were equal between groups. According to linear regression, the type of surgery, radiculopathy, and radiculitis explain the significant postoperative pain in up to 50% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Our study reveals a significant difference in opioid consumption between patients undergoing different surgical techniques. While these findings are valid for the studied population, the limitation in sample size highlights the need for further research. The implications of our findings on postoperative pain management and opioid use in spinal surgeries are significant and warrant continued investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1792141\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1792141","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Opioid Use after Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery.
Background: Opioids are medications frequently used in patients with moderate and severe chronic pain. Their pharmacologic profile allows their use in acute severe postoperative pain. However, due to their highly addictive profile, opioid misuse is considered a public health issue. Vertebral spine fusion, decompression, and instrumentation are often associated with acute, severe postoperative pain. The present study aims to compare postoperative opioid consumption in a group of patients who underwent open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) against a similar group of patients who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MTLIF).
Methods: We present a quantitative, observational, analytical, and historical cohort study. After convenience sampling, we identified 45 patients, 34 of whom underwent OTLIF and 11 underwent MTLIF. The analysis was made after measuring the following variables: demographics, type of surgery, length of stay, pain control, opioid type, and opioid dose. Statistical methods were implemented according to the origin and behavior of the variable.
Results: We found a difference between significant and nonsignificant pain among the groups with less opioid consumption in the MTILF group. This difference was seen in the frequency and dosage during all observation periods. However, in the postoperative observation, the frequencies and dosages were equal between groups. According to linear regression, the type of surgery, radiculopathy, and radiculitis explain the significant postoperative pain in up to 50% of cases.
Conclusion: Our study reveals a significant difference in opioid consumption between patients undergoing different surgical techniques. While these findings are valid for the studied population, the limitation in sample size highlights the need for further research. The implications of our findings on postoperative pain management and opioid use in spinal surgeries are significant and warrant continued investigation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery (JNLS A) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS A currently serves as the official organ of several national neurosurgery societies.
JNLS A is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS A includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS A covers purely neurosurgical topics.