将 Kerlan-Jobe 骨科诊所的肩肘评分翻译成日语并进行跨文化改编,比较视觉模拟量表和 10 分制量表。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241291861
Tomonobu Ishigaki, Hirotake Yokota, Hiroshi Akuzawa, Noriko Akiho-Toyoda, Keisuke Ushiro, Yuki Ebihara, Shigeharu Tanaka, Tadashi Wada, Hirofumi Jigami, Hisashi Matsumoto, Yu Ito, Takanori Kikumoto, Yuiko Matsuura, Ryo Hirabayashi, Chie Sekine, Noriaki Yamamoto, Go Omori, Mutsuaki Edama
{"title":"将 Kerlan-Jobe 骨科诊所的肩肘评分翻译成日语并进行跨文化改编,比较视觉模拟量表和 10 分制量表。","authors":"Tomonobu Ishigaki, Hirotake Yokota, Hiroshi Akuzawa, Noriko Akiho-Toyoda, Keisuke Ushiro, Yuki Ebihara, Shigeharu Tanaka, Tadashi Wada, Hirofumi Jigami, Hisashi Matsumoto, Yu Ito, Takanori Kikumoto, Yuiko Matsuura, Ryo Hirabayashi, Chie Sekine, Noriaki Yamamoto, Go Omori, Mutsuaki Edama","doi":"10.1177/23259671241291861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic shoulder and elbow score (KJOC) is sensitive enough to detect subtle changes in the functional level of the shoulder or elbow in overhead athletes. However, a Japanese version of the KJOC is not yet available. Moreover, the original KJOC uses a visual analog scale (VAS) assessment format that requires a print version so that users can add a check mark along a horizontal line. The KJOC can be completed using online tools such as Google Forms if a 10-point scale format can be used with comparable results.</p><p><strong>Purposes: </strong>To (1) translate and cross-culturally adapt the KJOC into Japanese (KJOC-J) and assess its validity and (2) evaluate the correlation between a standard VAS format and a 10-point scale format (KJOC-J10).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 318 athletes participated in the validation study, 255 in the test-retest reliability study for the KJOC-J, and 273 in the validation study for the KJOC-J10. Internal consistency was evaluated using the Cronbach alpha. Validity was evaluated by calculating the correlation between the KJOC-J and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The validity of the KJOC-J10 was evaluated by calculating the correlation between the KJOC-J10 and KJOC-J.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach alpha was 0.914, indicating good internal consistency. The KJOC-J was moderately correlated with the DASH (<i>r</i> = -0.581; <i>P</i> < .001) and had good test-retest reliability (ICC, 0.874). A strong correlation was found between the KJOC-J and KJOC-J10 (<i>r</i> = 0.846; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study results demonstrated good internal consistency, validity, and reliability for the KJOC-J, indicating that it is a valid assessment tool for shoulder and elbow functions in Japanese overhead athletes. Moreover, a strong correlation was found between the VAS and 10-point formats of the KJOC-J.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"12 11","pages":"23259671241291861"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation and Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score Into Japanese and Comparison of Visual Analog Scale and 10-Point Scale Formats.\",\"authors\":\"Tomonobu Ishigaki, Hirotake Yokota, Hiroshi Akuzawa, Noriko Akiho-Toyoda, Keisuke Ushiro, Yuki Ebihara, Shigeharu Tanaka, Tadashi Wada, Hirofumi Jigami, Hisashi Matsumoto, Yu Ito, Takanori Kikumoto, Yuiko Matsuura, Ryo Hirabayashi, Chie Sekine, Noriaki Yamamoto, Go Omori, Mutsuaki Edama\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23259671241291861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic shoulder and elbow score (KJOC) is sensitive enough to detect subtle changes in the functional level of the shoulder or elbow in overhead athletes. However, a Japanese version of the KJOC is not yet available. Moreover, the original KJOC uses a visual analog scale (VAS) assessment format that requires a print version so that users can add a check mark along a horizontal line. The KJOC can be completed using online tools such as Google Forms if a 10-point scale format can be used with comparable results.</p><p><strong>Purposes: </strong>To (1) translate and cross-culturally adapt the KJOC into Japanese (KJOC-J) and assess its validity and (2) evaluate the correlation between a standard VAS format and a 10-point scale format (KJOC-J10).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 318 athletes participated in the validation study, 255 in the test-retest reliability study for the KJOC-J, and 273 in the validation study for the KJOC-J10. Internal consistency was evaluated using the Cronbach alpha. Validity was evaluated by calculating the correlation between the KJOC-J and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The validity of the KJOC-J10 was evaluated by calculating the correlation between the KJOC-J10 and KJOC-J.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach alpha was 0.914, indicating good internal consistency. The KJOC-J was moderately correlated with the DASH (<i>r</i> = -0.581; <i>P</i> < .001) and had good test-retest reliability (ICC, 0.874). A strong correlation was found between the KJOC-J and KJOC-J10 (<i>r</i> = 0.846; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study results demonstrated good internal consistency, validity, and reliability for the KJOC-J, indicating that it is a valid assessment tool for shoulder and elbow functions in Japanese overhead athletes. Moreover, a strong correlation was found between the VAS and 10-point formats of the KJOC-J.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 11\",\"pages\":\"23259671241291861\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574881/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241291861\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241291861","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic 肩肘评分(KJOC)的灵敏度足以检测出高空运动员肩部或肘部功能水平的细微变化。然而,目前还没有日文版的 KJOC。此外,最初的 KJOC 采用的是视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估格式,需要打印版本,以便用户沿水平线添加复选标记。如果可以使用 10 分制的量表格式且结果相当,则可以使用谷歌表单等在线工具完成 KJOC:研究设计:研究设计:队列研究(诊断);证据等级,3:共有 318 名运动员参加了验证研究,255 名运动员参加了 KJOC-J 的测试-再测可靠性研究,273 名运动员参加了 KJOC-J10 的验证研究。内部一致性采用 Cronbach alpha 进行评估。通过计算 KJOC-J 与手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)之间的相关性来评估有效性。通过类内相关系数(ICC)评估了重测可靠性。通过计算 KJOC-J10 和 KJOC-J 之间的相关性,评估了 KJOC-J10 的有效性:结果:Cronbach alpha 为 0.914,表明内部一致性良好。KJOC-J 与 DASH 呈中度相关(r = -0.581; P < .001),并且具有良好的测试-再测可靠性(ICC,0.874)。结论:KJOC-J 和 KJOC-J10 之间存在很强的相关性(r = 0.846;P < .001):研究结果表明,KJOC-J 具有良好的内部一致性、有效性和可靠性,表明它是评估日本高抬腿运动员肩肘功能的有效工具。此外,KJOC-J 的 VAS 和 10 分格式之间也存在很强的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Translation and Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score Into Japanese and Comparison of Visual Analog Scale and 10-Point Scale Formats.

Background: The Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic shoulder and elbow score (KJOC) is sensitive enough to detect subtle changes in the functional level of the shoulder or elbow in overhead athletes. However, a Japanese version of the KJOC is not yet available. Moreover, the original KJOC uses a visual analog scale (VAS) assessment format that requires a print version so that users can add a check mark along a horizontal line. The KJOC can be completed using online tools such as Google Forms if a 10-point scale format can be used with comparable results.

Purposes: To (1) translate and cross-culturally adapt the KJOC into Japanese (KJOC-J) and assess its validity and (2) evaluate the correlation between a standard VAS format and a 10-point scale format (KJOC-J10).

Study design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: In total, 318 athletes participated in the validation study, 255 in the test-retest reliability study for the KJOC-J, and 273 in the validation study for the KJOC-J10. Internal consistency was evaluated using the Cronbach alpha. Validity was evaluated by calculating the correlation between the KJOC-J and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The validity of the KJOC-J10 was evaluated by calculating the correlation between the KJOC-J10 and KJOC-J.

Results: The Cronbach alpha was 0.914, indicating good internal consistency. The KJOC-J was moderately correlated with the DASH (r = -0.581; P < .001) and had good test-retest reliability (ICC, 0.874). A strong correlation was found between the KJOC-J and KJOC-J10 (r = 0.846; P < .001).

Conclusion: The study results demonstrated good internal consistency, validity, and reliability for the KJOC-J, indicating that it is a valid assessment tool for shoulder and elbow functions in Japanese overhead athletes. Moreover, a strong correlation was found between the VAS and 10-point formats of the KJOC-J.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Return to Activity After Patellofemoral Osteochondral Fracture: A Comparison of Metallic Screw and Bioabsorbable Fixation. Trends in Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries and Surgery From 2010 to 2019: An Analysis of a National Medical Claims Database. Association Between Tibiofemoral Bone Shape Features and Retears After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Effect of Acetabular Labral Tear Orientation on Hip Joint Kinematics: A Comparison of Radial Tears, Chondrolabral Junction Tears and Complex Tears in Cadaveric Hips. Postoperative Opioid Reduction Using a Multimodal Pain Protocol for Outpatient Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1