改善高收入国家服务不足人群获得癌症护理机会的干预措施:系统综述。

IF 3.1 Q2 ONCOLOGY Oncology Reviews Pub Date : 2024-11-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/or.2024.1427441
Anna Santos Salas, Nahyeni Bassah, Anna Pujadas Botey, Paula Robson, Julia Beranek, Iqmat Iyiola, Megan Kennedy
{"title":"改善高收入国家服务不足人群获得癌症护理机会的干预措施:系统综述。","authors":"Anna Santos Salas, Nahyeni Bassah, Anna Pujadas Botey, Paula Robson, Julia Beranek, Iqmat Iyiola, Megan Kennedy","doi":"10.3389/or.2024.1427441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Underserved populations both globally and in Canada face serious cancer inequities that result from systemic economic, environmental, and social conditions. These pose barriers in access to cancer care and lead to suboptimal cancer care experiences and outcomes. Knowledge of effective interventions to improve access to cancer care is needed to inform the design of tailored interventions for these populations.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify interventions and programs to improve access to cancer care for underserved populations in high income countries with universal health coverage (UHC) and the United States (US) throughout the cancer care continuum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA standards. We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria: quantitative and qualitative studies published in English in the last 10 years (2013-2023), describing interventions/programs to improve access to cancer care for underserved populations (18 years and over). We included studies in the US given the body of scholarship on equity in cancer care in that country. Screening, data extraction and analysis were undertaken by two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 7,549 articles, and 74 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 56 were conducted in the US, 8 in Australia, 6 in Canada, and 4 in the United Kingdom. Most (90.5%) were quantitative studies and 47.3% were published between 2020-2023. Seven types of interventions were identified: patient navigation, education and counselling, virtual health, service redesign, financial support, improving geographical accessibility and multicomponent interventions. Interventions were mainly designed to mitigate language, distance, financial, lack of knowledge and cultural barriers. Most interventions focused on access to cancer screening, targeted rural populations, racialized groups and people with low socioeconomic status, and were conducted in community-based settings. The majority of interventions or programs significantly improved access to cancer care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our systematic review findings suggest that interventions designed to remove specific barriers faced by underserved populations can improve access to cancer care. Few studies came from countries with UHC. Research is required to understand tailored interventions for underserved populations in countries with UHC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19487,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Reviews","volume":"18 ","pages":"1427441"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573526/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions to improve access to cancer care in underserved populations in high income countries: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Santos Salas, Nahyeni Bassah, Anna Pujadas Botey, Paula Robson, Julia Beranek, Iqmat Iyiola, Megan Kennedy\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/or.2024.1427441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Underserved populations both globally and in Canada face serious cancer inequities that result from systemic economic, environmental, and social conditions. These pose barriers in access to cancer care and lead to suboptimal cancer care experiences and outcomes. Knowledge of effective interventions to improve access to cancer care is needed to inform the design of tailored interventions for these populations.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify interventions and programs to improve access to cancer care for underserved populations in high income countries with universal health coverage (UHC) and the United States (US) throughout the cancer care continuum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA standards. We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria: quantitative and qualitative studies published in English in the last 10 years (2013-2023), describing interventions/programs to improve access to cancer care for underserved populations (18 years and over). We included studies in the US given the body of scholarship on equity in cancer care in that country. Screening, data extraction and analysis were undertaken by two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 7,549 articles, and 74 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 56 were conducted in the US, 8 in Australia, 6 in Canada, and 4 in the United Kingdom. Most (90.5%) were quantitative studies and 47.3% were published between 2020-2023. Seven types of interventions were identified: patient navigation, education and counselling, virtual health, service redesign, financial support, improving geographical accessibility and multicomponent interventions. Interventions were mainly designed to mitigate language, distance, financial, lack of knowledge and cultural barriers. Most interventions focused on access to cancer screening, targeted rural populations, racialized groups and people with low socioeconomic status, and were conducted in community-based settings. The majority of interventions or programs significantly improved access to cancer care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our systematic review findings suggest that interventions designed to remove specific barriers faced by underserved populations can improve access to cancer care. Few studies came from countries with UHC. Research is required to understand tailored interventions for underserved populations in countries with UHC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology Reviews\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1427441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573526/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/or.2024.1427441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/or.2024.1427441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:无论是在全球还是在加拿大,未得到充分服务的人群都面临着严重的癌症不平等,这些不平等是由系统性的经济、环境和社会条件造成的。这些因素阻碍了癌症患者获得癌症治疗,并导致了不理想的癌症治疗体验和结果。我们需要了解改善癌症治疗机会的有效干预措施,以便为这些人群设计量身定制的干预措施提供信息。目的:在癌症治疗的整个过程中,确定在全民医保(UHC)的高收入国家和美国改善服务不足人群癌症治疗机会的干预措施和计划:我们按照 PRISMA 标准进行了系统性回顾。我们检索了 Medline、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Scopus 和 Cochrane 图书馆。纳入标准:过去 10 年(2013-2023 年)中用英语发表的定量和定性研究,这些研究描述了为改善服务不足人群(18 岁及以上)获得癌症护理的机会而采取的干预措施/计划。考虑到美国在癌症治疗公平性方面的学术成果,我们纳入了美国的研究。筛选、数据提取和分析工作由两名独立审稿人完成:结果:我们的搜索共获得 7549 篇文章,74 篇符合纳入标准。其中,美国 56 篇,澳大利亚 8 篇,加拿大 6 篇,英国 4 篇。大部分(90.5%)为定量研究,47.3%发表于 2020-2023 年间。研究确定了七类干预措施:患者导航、教育和咨询、虚拟医疗、服务重新设计、财政支持、改善地理可达性和多成分干预。干预措施主要是为了减少语言、距离、经济、知识和文化方面的障碍。大多数干预措施侧重于癌症筛查的可及性,针对农村人口、种族群体和社会经济地位较低的人群,并在社区环境中开展。大多数干预措施或计划都极大地改善了癌症治疗的可及性:我们的系统综述结果表明,旨在消除服务不足人群面临的特定障碍的干预措施可以改善癌症治疗的可及性。来自全民医保国家的研究很少。需要开展研究,以了解在实行全民医保的国家中为服务不足人群量身定制的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interventions to improve access to cancer care in underserved populations in high income countries: a systematic review.

Background: Underserved populations both globally and in Canada face serious cancer inequities that result from systemic economic, environmental, and social conditions. These pose barriers in access to cancer care and lead to suboptimal cancer care experiences and outcomes. Knowledge of effective interventions to improve access to cancer care is needed to inform the design of tailored interventions for these populations.

Aim: To identify interventions and programs to improve access to cancer care for underserved populations in high income countries with universal health coverage (UHC) and the United States (US) throughout the cancer care continuum.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA standards. We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria: quantitative and qualitative studies published in English in the last 10 years (2013-2023), describing interventions/programs to improve access to cancer care for underserved populations (18 years and over). We included studies in the US given the body of scholarship on equity in cancer care in that country. Screening, data extraction and analysis were undertaken by two independent reviewers.

Results: Our search yielded 7,549 articles, and 74 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 56 were conducted in the US, 8 in Australia, 6 in Canada, and 4 in the United Kingdom. Most (90.5%) were quantitative studies and 47.3% were published between 2020-2023. Seven types of interventions were identified: patient navigation, education and counselling, virtual health, service redesign, financial support, improving geographical accessibility and multicomponent interventions. Interventions were mainly designed to mitigate language, distance, financial, lack of knowledge and cultural barriers. Most interventions focused on access to cancer screening, targeted rural populations, racialized groups and people with low socioeconomic status, and were conducted in community-based settings. The majority of interventions or programs significantly improved access to cancer care.

Conclusion: Our systematic review findings suggest that interventions designed to remove specific barriers faced by underserved populations can improve access to cancer care. Few studies came from countries with UHC. Research is required to understand tailored interventions for underserved populations in countries with UHC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology Reviews
Oncology Reviews ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Oncology Reviews is a quarterly peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes authoritative state-of-the-art reviews on preclinical and clinical aspects of oncology. The journal will provide up-to-date information on the latest achievements in different fields of oncology for both practising clinicians and basic researchers. Oncology Reviews aims at being international in scope and readership, as reflected also by its Editorial Board, gathering the world leading experts in both pre-clinical research and everyday clinical practice. The journal is open for publication of supplements, monothematic issues and for publishing abstracts of scientific meetings; conditions can be obtained from the Editor-in-Chief or the publisher.
期刊最新文献
Interventions to improve access to cancer care in underserved populations in high income countries: a systematic review. The prevalence of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis among breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node involvement and its impact on clinical decision-making: a single-centred retrospective study. Tumor therapeutics in the era of "RECIST": past, current insights, and future prospects. Colorectal cancer and associated genetic, lifestyle, cigarette, nargileh-hookah use and alcohol consumption risk factors: a comprehensive case-control study. Environment and gynaecologic cancers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1