院前儿科镇痛的障碍和促进因素。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Prehospital Emergency Care Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1080/10903127.2024.2431586
Hoi See Tsao, Tanya Sutcliffe, Charles Wang, Sara E Vargas, Chelsea Day, Linda L Brown
{"title":"院前儿科镇痛的障碍和促进因素。","authors":"Hoi See Tsao, Tanya Sutcliffe, Charles Wang, Sara E Vargas, Chelsea Day, Linda L Brown","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2431586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Children make up 5-10% of emergency medical services (EMS) transports and are at risk for under-recognition and under-treatment of pain. Prior studies have identified enablers to pediatric analgesia including EMS pediatric analgesia education, agency leadership support, the availability of assistive guides and having positive relationships with online medical control. Prior barriers identified were intravenous (IV) line insertion pain, caregiver concerns, difficulty assessing pain, pain medication safety concerns, unfamiliarity with pediatrics, unwanted attention from authority figures and perceived superiority of hospital care. This study's objective was to evaluate enablers and barriers to prehospital analgesia for children presenting with traumatic pain after the introduction of intranasal (IN) fentanyl into EMS protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Focus groups with EMS clinicians were used to elicit perspectives on pediatric analgesia. EMS clinicians discussed transports of children in pain, decision-making regarding analgesic administration, available resources to treat pain including EMS protocols, patient and family reactions, and ways to improve pediatric oligoanalgesia. Themes were explored until thematic saturation was reached using a deductive approach with open-ended yet structured questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enablers for pediatric analgesia included longer transports, desire to stabilize the patient, vital signs or injuries suggestive of severe pain, and clinician comfort with and availability of IN pain medication. Barriers to analgesia included concerns that the child was not stable enough for pain medication, avoiding masking symptoms prior to hospital arrival, lack of pediatric experience, lack of access to opiates in some ambulances, poor suspension in ambulances causing difficulty with IV access, patient refusal for an IV, caregivers' discomfort with opiates and caregivers' lack of knowledge of available prehospital medications. Focus group themes identified were that there was a lack of experience with pediatric patients, medical control was a helpful resource and training that approximated real-world situations was important.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>New enablers for pediatric analgesia identified were longer transports and EMS clinician comfort with IN pain medications. While many barriers to pediatric analgesia persist, new barriers identified were poor suspension in ambulances causing difficulty with IV access and caregivers' lack of knowledge of available prehospital medications. Additional EMS pediatric training and experience may improve pediatric oligoanalgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Enablers in Prehospital Pediatric Analgesia.\",\"authors\":\"Hoi See Tsao, Tanya Sutcliffe, Charles Wang, Sara E Vargas, Chelsea Day, Linda L Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2431586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Children make up 5-10% of emergency medical services (EMS) transports and are at risk for under-recognition and under-treatment of pain. Prior studies have identified enablers to pediatric analgesia including EMS pediatric analgesia education, agency leadership support, the availability of assistive guides and having positive relationships with online medical control. Prior barriers identified were intravenous (IV) line insertion pain, caregiver concerns, difficulty assessing pain, pain medication safety concerns, unfamiliarity with pediatrics, unwanted attention from authority figures and perceived superiority of hospital care. This study's objective was to evaluate enablers and barriers to prehospital analgesia for children presenting with traumatic pain after the introduction of intranasal (IN) fentanyl into EMS protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Focus groups with EMS clinicians were used to elicit perspectives on pediatric analgesia. EMS clinicians discussed transports of children in pain, decision-making regarding analgesic administration, available resources to treat pain including EMS protocols, patient and family reactions, and ways to improve pediatric oligoanalgesia. Themes were explored until thematic saturation was reached using a deductive approach with open-ended yet structured questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enablers for pediatric analgesia included longer transports, desire to stabilize the patient, vital signs or injuries suggestive of severe pain, and clinician comfort with and availability of IN pain medication. Barriers to analgesia included concerns that the child was not stable enough for pain medication, avoiding masking symptoms prior to hospital arrival, lack of pediatric experience, lack of access to opiates in some ambulances, poor suspension in ambulances causing difficulty with IV access, patient refusal for an IV, caregivers' discomfort with opiates and caregivers' lack of knowledge of available prehospital medications. Focus group themes identified were that there was a lack of experience with pediatric patients, medical control was a helpful resource and training that approximated real-world situations was important.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>New enablers for pediatric analgesia identified were longer transports and EMS clinician comfort with IN pain medications. While many barriers to pediatric analgesia persist, new barriers identified were poor suspension in ambulances causing difficulty with IV access and caregivers' lack of knowledge of available prehospital medications. Additional EMS pediatric training and experience may improve pediatric oligoanalgesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2431586\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2431586","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:儿童占紧急医疗服务(EMS)转运人数的 5-10%,他们有可能对疼痛认识不足和治疗不足。先前的研究已经确定了儿科镇痛的促进因素,包括急救医疗服务儿科镇痛教育、机构领导的支持、辅助指南的可用性以及与在线医疗控制的积极关系。之前发现的障碍包括静脉注射(IV)管插入疼痛、护理人员的担忧、疼痛评估困难、止痛药物安全问题、对儿科不熟悉、权威人士不希望的关注以及认为医院护理更优越。本研究的目的是评估在急救协议中引入鼻内芬太尼(IN)后,对出现外伤性疼痛的儿童进行院前镇痛的有利因素和障碍:方法: 通过与急救医疗临床医生进行焦点小组讨论,了解他们对儿科镇痛的看法。EMS 临床医生讨论了疼痛儿童的转运、镇痛剂使用的决策、治疗疼痛的可用资源(包括 EMS 协议)、患者和家属的反应以及改进儿科低剂量镇痛的方法。采用开放式但结构化的问题演绎法对主题进行探讨,直到主题饱和为止:结果:小儿镇痛的有利因素包括:转运时间较长、希望稳定患者病情、生命体征或损伤提示剧烈疼痛、临床医生对 IN 镇痛药物的适应性和可用性。镇痛的障碍包括担心患儿病情不够稳定而无法使用镇痛药物、避免在到达医院前掩盖症状、缺乏儿科经验、某些救护车无法使用鸦片制剂、救护车悬挂装置不良导致静脉注射困难、患者拒绝静脉注射、护理人员对鸦片制剂感到不适以及护理人员缺乏院前可用药物的知识。焦点小组确定的主题包括:对儿科病人缺乏经验、医疗控制是一种有用的资源,以及接近实际情况的培训非常重要:结论:儿科镇痛的新促进因素是更长的转运时间和急救医生对 IN 镇痛药物的熟悉程度。虽然儿科镇痛的许多障碍依然存在,但新发现的障碍是救护车悬挂不良导致静脉注射困难,以及护理人员对可用的院前药物缺乏了解。额外的急救医疗儿科培训和经验可能会改善儿科低剂量镇痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers and Enablers in Prehospital Pediatric Analgesia.

Objectives: Children make up 5-10% of emergency medical services (EMS) transports and are at risk for under-recognition and under-treatment of pain. Prior studies have identified enablers to pediatric analgesia including EMS pediatric analgesia education, agency leadership support, the availability of assistive guides and having positive relationships with online medical control. Prior barriers identified were intravenous (IV) line insertion pain, caregiver concerns, difficulty assessing pain, pain medication safety concerns, unfamiliarity with pediatrics, unwanted attention from authority figures and perceived superiority of hospital care. This study's objective was to evaluate enablers and barriers to prehospital analgesia for children presenting with traumatic pain after the introduction of intranasal (IN) fentanyl into EMS protocols.

Methods: Focus groups with EMS clinicians were used to elicit perspectives on pediatric analgesia. EMS clinicians discussed transports of children in pain, decision-making regarding analgesic administration, available resources to treat pain including EMS protocols, patient and family reactions, and ways to improve pediatric oligoanalgesia. Themes were explored until thematic saturation was reached using a deductive approach with open-ended yet structured questions.

Results: Enablers for pediatric analgesia included longer transports, desire to stabilize the patient, vital signs or injuries suggestive of severe pain, and clinician comfort with and availability of IN pain medication. Barriers to analgesia included concerns that the child was not stable enough for pain medication, avoiding masking symptoms prior to hospital arrival, lack of pediatric experience, lack of access to opiates in some ambulances, poor suspension in ambulances causing difficulty with IV access, patient refusal for an IV, caregivers' discomfort with opiates and caregivers' lack of knowledge of available prehospital medications. Focus group themes identified were that there was a lack of experience with pediatric patients, medical control was a helpful resource and training that approximated real-world situations was important.

Conclusions: New enablers for pediatric analgesia identified were longer transports and EMS clinician comfort with IN pain medications. While many barriers to pediatric analgesia persist, new barriers identified were poor suspension in ambulances causing difficulty with IV access and caregivers' lack of knowledge of available prehospital medications. Additional EMS pediatric training and experience may improve pediatric oligoanalgesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Key Takeaways and Progress on Leveraging EMS in Overdose Response Among Five Learning Collaborative States. Uses of Fibrinogen Concentrate in Management of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy in the Prehospital Environment: A Scoping Review. Correlation Between EtCO2 and PCO2 in Patients Undergoing Critical Care Transport. The National Association of EMS Physicians Compendium of Prehospital Trauma Management Position Statements and Resource Documents. Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Fluid Resuscitation in Trauma- a position statement and resource document of NAEMSP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1