考虑胚胎发育速度的定制胚胎移植,克服个性化胚胎移植的困境。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Reproductive biomedicine online Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104405
Yasuhiro Ohara, Hidehiko Matsubayashi, Shimpei Mizuta, Masakazu Doshida, Takumi Takeuchi, Tomomoto Ishikawa, Mika Handa, Tatsuya Miyake, Tsuyoshi Takiuchi, Tadashi Kimura
{"title":"考虑胚胎发育速度的定制胚胎移植,克服个性化胚胎移植的困境。","authors":"Yasuhiro Ohara, Hidehiko Matsubayashi, Shimpei Mizuta, Masakazu Doshida, Takumi Takeuchi, Tomomoto Ishikawa, Mika Handa, Tatsuya Miyake, Tsuyoshi Takiuchi, Tadashi Kimura","doi":"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does tailor-made embryo transfer (TmET), timed with respect to embryonic developmental speed, affect pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent implantation failure?</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Among 741 patients identified as receptive through endometrial receptivity testing, the clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates were retrospectively compared between those who underwent standard personalized embryo transfer and those who underwent TmET in hormone replacement therapy cycles. Personalized embryo transfer was performed according to endometrial receptivity test results (standard personalized embryo transfer group) or considering embryonic developmental speed (TmET group). For TmET, the expansion grade of warmed blastocysts was estimated based on each patient's previous embryonic developmental pattern. The embryo transfer days were set so that estimated blastocyst grades 3, 4, 5 and 6 were transferred on days P+5, P+5.5, P+6.0 and P+6.5, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a propensity score matching analysis, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the TmET group than the standard personalized embryo transfer group (P = 0.014), whereas the live birth rates were similar between the two groups (P = 0.65). In a subgroup analysis with euploid embryo transfers, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the TmET group than the standard personalized embryo transfer group, although there was no difference in live birth rate between the two groups (P = 0.045 and P = 0.057, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients experiencing recurrent implantation failure and identified as receptive through endometrial receptivity testing, subsequent TmET strategies may further enhance pregnancy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21134,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive biomedicine online","volume":" ","pages":"104405"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tailor-made embryo transfer considering embryonic developmental speed to overcome the dilemma of personalized embryo transfer.\",\"authors\":\"Yasuhiro Ohara, Hidehiko Matsubayashi, Shimpei Mizuta, Masakazu Doshida, Takumi Takeuchi, Tomomoto Ishikawa, Mika Handa, Tatsuya Miyake, Tsuyoshi Takiuchi, Tadashi Kimura\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does tailor-made embryo transfer (TmET), timed with respect to embryonic developmental speed, affect pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent implantation failure?</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Among 741 patients identified as receptive through endometrial receptivity testing, the clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates were retrospectively compared between those who underwent standard personalized embryo transfer and those who underwent TmET in hormone replacement therapy cycles. Personalized embryo transfer was performed according to endometrial receptivity test results (standard personalized embryo transfer group) or considering embryonic developmental speed (TmET group). For TmET, the expansion grade of warmed blastocysts was estimated based on each patient's previous embryonic developmental pattern. The embryo transfer days were set so that estimated blastocyst grades 3, 4, 5 and 6 were transferred on days P+5, P+5.5, P+6.0 and P+6.5, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a propensity score matching analysis, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the TmET group than the standard personalized embryo transfer group (P = 0.014), whereas the live birth rates were similar between the two groups (P = 0.65). In a subgroup analysis with euploid embryo transfers, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the TmET group than the standard personalized embryo transfer group, although there was no difference in live birth rate between the two groups (P = 0.045 and P = 0.057, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients experiencing recurrent implantation failure and identified as receptive through endometrial receptivity testing, subsequent TmET strategies may further enhance pregnancy outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive biomedicine online\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive biomedicine online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104405\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive biomedicine online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104405","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究问题:根据胚胎发育速度确定时间的定制胚胎移植(TmET)是否会影响反复植入失败患者的妊娠结局?在741名通过子宫内膜接受性测试确定为接受胚胎的患者中,回顾性比较了接受标准个性化胚胎移植的患者与在激素替代疗法周期中接受TmET的患者的临床妊娠率和活产率。个性化胚胎移植是根据子宫内膜接受性测试结果(标准个性化胚胎移植组)或考虑胚胎发育速度(TmET 组)进行的。在 TmET 组,根据每位患者之前的胚胎发育模式估算温育囊胚的扩张等级。胚胎移植天数被设定为估计囊胚等级 3、4、5 和 6,分别在 P+5、P+5.5、P+6.0 和 P+6.5 天移植:在倾向得分匹配分析中,TmET 组的临床妊娠率明显高于标准个性化胚胎移植组(P = 0.014),而两组的活产率相似(P = 0.65)。在优倍体胚胎移植的亚组分析中,TmET组的临床妊娠率明显高于标准个性化胚胎移植组,但两组的活产率没有差异(分别为P = 0.045和P = 0.057):结论:对于反复种植失败并通过子宫内膜接受性测试确定为有接受能力的患者,后续的TmET策略可进一步提高妊娠结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tailor-made embryo transfer considering embryonic developmental speed to overcome the dilemma of personalized embryo transfer.

Research question: Does tailor-made embryo transfer (TmET), timed with respect to embryonic developmental speed, affect pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent implantation failure?

Design: Among 741 patients identified as receptive through endometrial receptivity testing, the clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates were retrospectively compared between those who underwent standard personalized embryo transfer and those who underwent TmET in hormone replacement therapy cycles. Personalized embryo transfer was performed according to endometrial receptivity test results (standard personalized embryo transfer group) or considering embryonic developmental speed (TmET group). For TmET, the expansion grade of warmed blastocysts was estimated based on each patient's previous embryonic developmental pattern. The embryo transfer days were set so that estimated blastocyst grades 3, 4, 5 and 6 were transferred on days P+5, P+5.5, P+6.0 and P+6.5, respectively.

Results: In a propensity score matching analysis, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the TmET group than the standard personalized embryo transfer group (P = 0.014), whereas the live birth rates were similar between the two groups (P = 0.65). In a subgroup analysis with euploid embryo transfers, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the TmET group than the standard personalized embryo transfer group, although there was no difference in live birth rate between the two groups (P = 0.045 and P = 0.057, respectively).

Conclusions: For patients experiencing recurrent implantation failure and identified as receptive through endometrial receptivity testing, subsequent TmET strategies may further enhance pregnancy outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive biomedicine online
Reproductive biomedicine online 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.50%
发文量
391
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Reproductive BioMedicine Online covers the formation, growth and differentiation of the human embryo. It is intended to bring to public attention new research on biological and clinical research on human reproduction and the human embryo including relevant studies on animals. It is published by a group of scientists and clinicians working in these fields of study. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, academics and patients. Context: The period of human embryonic growth covered is between the formation of the primordial germ cells in the fetus until mid-pregnancy. High quality research on lower animals is included if it helps to clarify the human situation. Studies progressing to birth and later are published if they have a direct bearing on events in the earlier stages of pregnancy.
期刊最新文献
Private versus funded infertility care: not a challenge but a call for cooperation Ultra-fast vitrification and rapid elution of human oocytes: part I. germinal vesicle model validation. Ultra-fast vitrification and rapid elution of human oocytes: Part II - verification of blastocyst development from mature oocytes. Inside Front Cover - Affiliations and First page of TOC Front Matter - Continued TOC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1