一项回顾性观察研究:比较 2019 年第三波与第二波冠状病毒疫情期间需要住院治疗的患者的临床和实验室参数。

Milind, Sandeep Tak, Sudhakar Nayak, Gopal Raj Prajapati, Anu Vyas, Umaid Potaliya
{"title":"一项回顾性观察研究:比较 2019 年第三波与第二波冠状病毒疫情期间需要住院治疗的患者的临床和实验室参数。","authors":"Milind, Sandeep Tak, Sudhakar Nayak, Gopal Raj Prajapati, Anu Vyas, Umaid Potaliya","doi":"10.59556/japi.72.0716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Following the outbreak of coronavirus in Wuhan, China in 2019, there has been multiple waves of different variants of COVID-19 throughout the world in the continuum of a pandemic. This study aims to compare different clinical and laboratory parameters of hospitalized patients in Omicron-driven 3rd wave vs Delta-driven 2nd wave in India. <b>Materials and methods:</b> This was a retrospective cross-sectional observational study that was done in the Department of General Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, Dr S N Medical College, Jodhpur (Rajasthan). It included 100 patients of 3rd wave and 2nd wave respectively who were hospitalized. The primary outcome of the study was patient's survival and condition at discharge and secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and mode of oxygenation. <b>Results:</b> The presence of cough, shortness of breath, and loss of taste are more common symptoms in 2nd wave vs 3rd wave with <i>p</i>-value being 0.0002, 0.004, and < 0.0001 respectively. The severity of illness, need for intensive care unit (ICU), and outcome in terms of discharge with oxygen or without oxygen were also statistically significant in the 2nd wave vs 3rd wave with <i>p</i>-value being < 0.0001 for all three variables. A total of 67% of patients were vaccinated in 3rd wave group compared to 11% in 2nd wave group (<i>p</i>-value < 0.0001). Comparison of laboratory parameters also revealed statistically significant results with D-dimer, quantitative C-reactive protein (CRP), normal (NL) ratio, and serum lactate being more deranged in the 2nd wave compared to the 3rd wave with <i>p</i>-value being < 0.05. Comparison of involvement of lung parenchyma based on computed tomography (CT) severity score revealed <i>p</i>-value < 0.0001 that is statistically relevant. <b>Conclusion:</b> Omicron-driven 3rd wave was associated with significantly less severity, less inflammatory response, and better outcome compared to Delta-driven 2nd wave. More vaccination and probably less intrinsic virulence during 3rd wave has a major role in the better outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":22693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","volume":"72 11","pages":"49-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Retrospective Observational Study to Compare the Clinical and Laboratory Parameters of Patients Requiring Hospitalization during 3rd Wave vs 2nd Wave of Coronavirus Disease 2019.\",\"authors\":\"Milind, Sandeep Tak, Sudhakar Nayak, Gopal Raj Prajapati, Anu Vyas, Umaid Potaliya\",\"doi\":\"10.59556/japi.72.0716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Following the outbreak of coronavirus in Wuhan, China in 2019, there has been multiple waves of different variants of COVID-19 throughout the world in the continuum of a pandemic. This study aims to compare different clinical and laboratory parameters of hospitalized patients in Omicron-driven 3rd wave vs Delta-driven 2nd wave in India. <b>Materials and methods:</b> This was a retrospective cross-sectional observational study that was done in the Department of General Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, Dr S N Medical College, Jodhpur (Rajasthan). It included 100 patients of 3rd wave and 2nd wave respectively who were hospitalized. The primary outcome of the study was patient's survival and condition at discharge and secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and mode of oxygenation. <b>Results:</b> The presence of cough, shortness of breath, and loss of taste are more common symptoms in 2nd wave vs 3rd wave with <i>p</i>-value being 0.0002, 0.004, and < 0.0001 respectively. The severity of illness, need for intensive care unit (ICU), and outcome in terms of discharge with oxygen or without oxygen were also statistically significant in the 2nd wave vs 3rd wave with <i>p</i>-value being < 0.0001 for all three variables. A total of 67% of patients were vaccinated in 3rd wave group compared to 11% in 2nd wave group (<i>p</i>-value < 0.0001). Comparison of laboratory parameters also revealed statistically significant results with D-dimer, quantitative C-reactive protein (CRP), normal (NL) ratio, and serum lactate being more deranged in the 2nd wave compared to the 3rd wave with <i>p</i>-value being < 0.05. Comparison of involvement of lung parenchyma based on computed tomography (CT) severity score revealed <i>p</i>-value < 0.0001 that is statistically relevant. <b>Conclusion:</b> Omicron-driven 3rd wave was associated with significantly less severity, less inflammatory response, and better outcome compared to Delta-driven 2nd wave. More vaccination and probably less intrinsic virulence during 3rd wave has a major role in the better outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India\",\"volume\":\"72 11\",\"pages\":\"49-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.72.0716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.72.0716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:继2019年中国武汉爆发冠状病毒疫情后,COVID-19的不同变种在全球范围内连续爆发了多波疫情。本研究旨在比较印度奥米克龙驱动的第三波与德尔塔驱动的第二波住院患者的不同临床和实验室参数。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性横断面观察研究,在焦特布尔(拉贾斯坦邦)S N 博士医学院圣雄甘地医院全科医学系进行。研究对象包括 100 名分别属于第三波和第二波的住院患者。研究的主要结果是患者的存活率和出院时的状况,次要结果包括住院时间和吸氧方式。研究结果咳嗽、呼吸急促和味觉丧失是第二波与第三波患者更常见的症状,P 值分别为 0.0002、0.004 和 <0.0001。病情严重程度、是否需要入住重症监护室(ICU)以及带氧出院或不带氧出院的结果在第二波与第三波中也有显著统计学意义,所有三个变量的 p 值均小于 0.0001。第三波组共有 67% 的患者接种了疫苗,而第二波组只有 11%(P 值小于 0.0001)。实验室参数的比较也显示出具有统计学意义的结果,与第三波组相比,第二波组的 D-二聚体、定量 C 反应蛋白(CRP)、正常(NL)比值和血清乳酸的变化更大,P 值均小于 0.05。根据计算机断层扫描(CT)严重程度评分对肺实质受累情况进行比较后发现,P 值小于 0.0001,具有统计学意义。结论与德尔塔驱动的第 2 波相比,奥米克龙驱动的第 3 波严重程度明显较轻,炎症反应较少,预后较好。第三波接种疫苗较多,可能内在毒力较弱,这是较好预后的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Retrospective Observational Study to Compare the Clinical and Laboratory Parameters of Patients Requiring Hospitalization during 3rd Wave vs 2nd Wave of Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Background: Following the outbreak of coronavirus in Wuhan, China in 2019, there has been multiple waves of different variants of COVID-19 throughout the world in the continuum of a pandemic. This study aims to compare different clinical and laboratory parameters of hospitalized patients in Omicron-driven 3rd wave vs Delta-driven 2nd wave in India. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional observational study that was done in the Department of General Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, Dr S N Medical College, Jodhpur (Rajasthan). It included 100 patients of 3rd wave and 2nd wave respectively who were hospitalized. The primary outcome of the study was patient's survival and condition at discharge and secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and mode of oxygenation. Results: The presence of cough, shortness of breath, and loss of taste are more common symptoms in 2nd wave vs 3rd wave with p-value being 0.0002, 0.004, and < 0.0001 respectively. The severity of illness, need for intensive care unit (ICU), and outcome in terms of discharge with oxygen or without oxygen were also statistically significant in the 2nd wave vs 3rd wave with p-value being < 0.0001 for all three variables. A total of 67% of patients were vaccinated in 3rd wave group compared to 11% in 2nd wave group (p-value < 0.0001). Comparison of laboratory parameters also revealed statistically significant results with D-dimer, quantitative C-reactive protein (CRP), normal (NL) ratio, and serum lactate being more deranged in the 2nd wave compared to the 3rd wave with p-value being < 0.05. Comparison of involvement of lung parenchyma based on computed tomography (CT) severity score revealed p-value < 0.0001 that is statistically relevant. Conclusion: Omicron-driven 3rd wave was associated with significantly less severity, less inflammatory response, and better outcome compared to Delta-driven 2nd wave. More vaccination and probably less intrinsic virulence during 3rd wave has a major role in the better outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
509
期刊最新文献
Bilateral Thoracic Herpes Zoster in a 62-year-old Immunocompetent Woman. Comparison of Basal Core Promoter Region Mutation and Precore Mutation among Monoinfected Hepatitis B Virus and Coinfected Hepatitis B Virus with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Patients. Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Drugs Remain the Mainstay of Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis in India. Current Update on Promising New Anti-Alzheimer's Drugs in Different Phases of Clinical Development: Where Exactly Are We Lacking? Evaluation of Prescription Pattern of Antihypertensives and Its Compliance with Joint National Committee 8 Guidelines in Hospital Setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1