墨西哥肺癌患者的耻辱感:加泰罗尼亚肺癌耻辱感量表(CLCSS)--简易版的心理计量特性。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Palliative & Supportive Care Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1017/S1478951524001263
Joel Flores-Juárez, Oscar Galindo-Vázquez, Patricia Ortega-Andeane, Ana Fresán-Orellana, Xolyanetzin Montero-Pardo, Tania Estapé, Marisol Arroyo-Hernández, Luis Antonio Cabrera-Miranda, Oscar Arrieta
{"title":"墨西哥肺癌患者的耻辱感:加泰罗尼亚肺癌耻辱感量表(CLCSS)--简易版的心理计量特性。","authors":"Joel Flores-Juárez, Oscar Galindo-Vázquez, Patricia Ortega-Andeane, Ana Fresán-Orellana, Xolyanetzin Montero-Pardo, Tania Estapé, Marisol Arroyo-Hernández, Luis Antonio Cabrera-Miranda, Oscar Arrieta","doi":"10.1017/S1478951524001263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stigma in lung cancer patients may be associated with various negative outcomes such as increased psychosocial symptoms, severity of physical symptoms, and may act as a barrier to medical help-seeking behavior. The Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS) is one of the most widely used instruments for assessing health-related stigma in lung cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the psychometric properties of the CLCSS in a Mexican sample of lung cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A non-experimental, instrumental design was employed, using non-probabilistic sampling based on availability. The sample included 265 lung cancer patients. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess construct validity, and Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega were used for internal consistency and test-retest reliability, respectively, through Pearson correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 17-item version yielded a model with 4 factors (stigma and shame, social isolation, discrimination, and smoking) explaining 50.74% of the variance, with adequate values of internal consistency and test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>The Mexican version of the CLCSS is culturally appropriate, brief, psychometrically valid, and reliable for assessing health-related stigma in Mexican lung cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stigma in Mexican patients with Lung Cancer: Psychometric Properties of the Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS) - Brief version.\",\"authors\":\"Joel Flores-Juárez, Oscar Galindo-Vázquez, Patricia Ortega-Andeane, Ana Fresán-Orellana, Xolyanetzin Montero-Pardo, Tania Estapé, Marisol Arroyo-Hernández, Luis Antonio Cabrera-Miranda, Oscar Arrieta\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1478951524001263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stigma in lung cancer patients may be associated with various negative outcomes such as increased psychosocial symptoms, severity of physical symptoms, and may act as a barrier to medical help-seeking behavior. The Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS) is one of the most widely used instruments for assessing health-related stigma in lung cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the psychometric properties of the CLCSS in a Mexican sample of lung cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A non-experimental, instrumental design was employed, using non-probabilistic sampling based on availability. The sample included 265 lung cancer patients. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess construct validity, and Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega were used for internal consistency and test-retest reliability, respectively, through Pearson correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 17-item version yielded a model with 4 factors (stigma and shame, social isolation, discrimination, and smoking) explaining 50.74% of the variance, with adequate values of internal consistency and test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>The Mexican version of the CLCSS is culturally appropriate, brief, psychometrically valid, and reliable for assessing health-related stigma in Mexican lung cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative & Supportive Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative & Supportive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524001263\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524001263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:肺癌患者的污名化可能与各种负面结果有关,如社会心理症状加重、身体症状严重,并可能成为求医行为的障碍。卡塔多肺癌病耻感量表(CLCSS)是评估肺癌患者健康相关病耻感最广泛使用的工具之一:在墨西哥肺癌患者样本中确定 CLCSS 的心理计量特性:采用非实验性工具设计,根据可用性进行非概率抽样。样本包括 265 名肺癌患者。进行了确证因子分析(CFA)以评估建构效度,并通过皮尔逊相关系数分别使用克朗巴赫α和麦当劳欧米茄来评估内部一致性和测试-再测可靠性:结果:17 个条目版本产生了一个包含 4 个因子(污名化和羞耻感、社会隔离、歧视和吸烟)的模型,解释了 50.74% 的方差,内部一致性和重复测试可靠性均达到了适当的值:结果表明:墨西哥版 CLCSS 符合墨西哥文化,简明扼要,心理测量有效且可靠,可用于评估墨西哥肺癌患者与健康相关的耻辱感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stigma in Mexican patients with Lung Cancer: Psychometric Properties of the Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS) - Brief version.

Introduction: Stigma in lung cancer patients may be associated with various negative outcomes such as increased psychosocial symptoms, severity of physical symptoms, and may act as a barrier to medical help-seeking behavior. The Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS) is one of the most widely used instruments for assessing health-related stigma in lung cancer patients.

Objectives: To determine the psychometric properties of the CLCSS in a Mexican sample of lung cancer patients.

Methods: A non-experimental, instrumental design was employed, using non-probabilistic sampling based on availability. The sample included 265 lung cancer patients. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess construct validity, and Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega were used for internal consistency and test-retest reliability, respectively, through Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results: The 17-item version yielded a model with 4 factors (stigma and shame, social isolation, discrimination, and smoking) explaining 50.74% of the variance, with adequate values of internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

Significance of results: The Mexican version of the CLCSS is culturally appropriate, brief, psychometrically valid, and reliable for assessing health-related stigma in Mexican lung cancer patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
期刊最新文献
An interpretative qualitative case study of a Compassionate Cities initiative in the United Kingdom: Lessons for implementation in other settings. Stigma in Mexican patients with Lung Cancer: Psychometric Properties of the Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS) - Brief version. Benefit-finding in children with advanced cancer and their parents. Predictors of mortality among older adults discharged to or readmitted from a skilled nursing facility. Nurses' models of spiritual care: Predictors of spiritual care competence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1