Rachel A Gothot, Michael J Maniaci, Margaret R Paulson, Igor Dumic, Amy A Haney, Zhuo Li, Karla C Maita, Brittane T Valles, Charles D Burger
{"title":"梅奥诊所 \"居家高级护理计划 \"治疗的 COVID-19 患者的临床特征和疗效。","authors":"Rachel A Gothot, Michael J Maniaci, Margaret R Paulson, Igor Dumic, Amy A Haney, Zhuo Li, Karla C Maita, Brittane T Valles, Charles D Burger","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mayo Clinic's hospital-at-home program, Advanced Care at Home (ACH), launched in 2020. While hospital-at-home literature reported safe and effective care for the general patient population and those with COVID, comparative outcomes between these two groups were unknown. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the outcomes of COVID and non-COVID patients enrolled in ACH and evaluate if COVID patients can be safely treated in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographics, clinical characteristics, and safety outcomes were retrospectively analyzed to compare COVID and non-COVID patients discharged from ACH between November 2020 and May 2022. Patient characteristics analyzed included severity of illness (SOI) and risk of mortality (ROM), calculated using All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRG). Hospitalization-specific variables included length of stay (LOS), escalation of care, and 30-day readmission rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1051 patients, 173 (16%) had COVID, and 878 (84%) were non-COVID patients. The average age in the COVID cohort was 66.6 (15.3) years, compared with 72.2 (14.0) in the non-COVID cohort. Extreme SOI was higher in the COVID group (43.3% versus 17.4%), as was extreme ROM (46.2% versus 16.2%), but LOS was shorter (5.7 versus 7 days). Escalation of care (7.5% in COVID cohort versus 8.4%) and 30-day readmission outcomes (9.2% for COVID patients versus 12.9%) were not statistically different between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite higher SOI and ROM, COVID patients had shorter LOS with outcomes that were not statistically different from non-COVID patients. COVID patients can be safely and efficiently cared for in ACH.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":"20 8","pages":"605-611"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19 Treated in Mayo Clinic's Advanced Care at Home Program.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel A Gothot, Michael J Maniaci, Margaret R Paulson, Igor Dumic, Amy A Haney, Zhuo Li, Karla C Maita, Brittane T Valles, Charles D Burger\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mayo Clinic's hospital-at-home program, Advanced Care at Home (ACH), launched in 2020. While hospital-at-home literature reported safe and effective care for the general patient population and those with COVID, comparative outcomes between these two groups were unknown. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the outcomes of COVID and non-COVID patients enrolled in ACH and evaluate if COVID patients can be safely treated in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographics, clinical characteristics, and safety outcomes were retrospectively analyzed to compare COVID and non-COVID patients discharged from ACH between November 2020 and May 2022. Patient characteristics analyzed included severity of illness (SOI) and risk of mortality (ROM), calculated using All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRG). Hospitalization-specific variables included length of stay (LOS), escalation of care, and 30-day readmission rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1051 patients, 173 (16%) had COVID, and 878 (84%) were non-COVID patients. The average age in the COVID cohort was 66.6 (15.3) years, compared with 72.2 (14.0) in the non-COVID cohort. Extreme SOI was higher in the COVID group (43.3% versus 17.4%), as was extreme ROM (46.2% versus 16.2%), but LOS was shorter (5.7 versus 7 days). Escalation of care (7.5% in COVID cohort versus 8.4%) and 30-day readmission outcomes (9.2% for COVID patients versus 12.9%) were not statistically different between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite higher SOI and ROM, COVID patients had shorter LOS with outcomes that were not statistically different from non-COVID patients. COVID patients can be safely and efficiently cared for in ACH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"volume\":\"20 8\",\"pages\":\"605-611\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001286\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001286","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标:梅奥诊所于 2020 年推出了医院居家护理计划--居家高级护理 (ACH)。尽管有文献报道居家医院为普通患者和 COVID 患者提供了安全有效的护理,但这两组患者之间的疗效对比尚不清楚。这项回顾性分析的目的是比较入住 ACH 的 COVID 患者和非 COVID 患者的疗效,并评估 COVID 患者能否在这种环境中得到安全治疗:对2020年11月至2022年5月期间从ACH出院的COVID和非COVID患者的人口统计学、临床特征和安全结果进行了回顾性分析比较。分析的患者特征包括疾病严重程度(SOI)和死亡风险(ROM),采用所有患者精制诊断相关组(APR-DRG)计算。住院特异性变量包括住院时间(LOS)、护理升级和 30 天再入院率:在 1051 名患者中,173 人(16%)患有 COVID,878 人(84%)为非 COVID 患者。COVID患者的平均年龄为66.6(15.3)岁,而非COVID患者的平均年龄为72.2(14.0)岁。COVID组的极度SOI更高(43.3%对17.4%),极度ROM也更高(46.2%对16.2%),但LOS更短(5.7天对7天)。两组患者的护理升级率(COVID组为7.5%,COVID组为8.4%)和30天再入院率(COVID组为9.2%,COVID组为12.9%)没有统计学差异:结论:尽管 COVID 患者的 SOI 和 ROM 较高,但他们的 LOS 较短,其结果与非 COVID 患者没有统计学差异。COVID患者可以在ACH中得到安全有效的护理。
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19 Treated in Mayo Clinic's Advanced Care at Home Program.
Objectives: Mayo Clinic's hospital-at-home program, Advanced Care at Home (ACH), launched in 2020. While hospital-at-home literature reported safe and effective care for the general patient population and those with COVID, comparative outcomes between these two groups were unknown. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the outcomes of COVID and non-COVID patients enrolled in ACH and evaluate if COVID patients can be safely treated in this setting.
Methods: Demographics, clinical characteristics, and safety outcomes were retrospectively analyzed to compare COVID and non-COVID patients discharged from ACH between November 2020 and May 2022. Patient characteristics analyzed included severity of illness (SOI) and risk of mortality (ROM), calculated using All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRG). Hospitalization-specific variables included length of stay (LOS), escalation of care, and 30-day readmission rates.
Results: Of 1051 patients, 173 (16%) had COVID, and 878 (84%) were non-COVID patients. The average age in the COVID cohort was 66.6 (15.3) years, compared with 72.2 (14.0) in the non-COVID cohort. Extreme SOI was higher in the COVID group (43.3% versus 17.4%), as was extreme ROM (46.2% versus 16.2%), but LOS was shorter (5.7 versus 7 days). Escalation of care (7.5% in COVID cohort versus 8.4%) and 30-day readmission outcomes (9.2% for COVID patients versus 12.9%) were not statistically different between the groups.
Conclusions: Despite higher SOI and ROM, COVID patients had shorter LOS with outcomes that were not statistically different from non-COVID patients. COVID patients can be safely and efficiently cared for in ACH.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.