单侧耳聋和不对称听力损失的人工耳蜗植入成本效益:随机对照试验结果。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS European Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1007/s10198-024-01740-9
Mathieu Marx, Michaël Mounié, Isabelle Mosnier, Frédéric Venail, Michel Mondain, Alain Uziel, David Bakhos, Emmanuel Lescanne, Yann N'Guyen, Daniele Bernardeschi, Olivier Sterkers, Benoit Godey, Gwenaëlle Creff, Sébastien Schmerber, Nicolas-Xavier Bonne, Christophe Vincent, Bernard Fraysse, Olivier Deguine, Nadège Costa
{"title":"单侧耳聋和不对称听力损失的人工耳蜗植入成本效益:随机对照试验结果。","authors":"Mathieu Marx, Michaël Mounié, Isabelle Mosnier, Frédéric Venail, Michel Mondain, Alain Uziel, David Bakhos, Emmanuel Lescanne, Yann N'Guyen, Daniele Bernardeschi, Olivier Sterkers, Benoit Godey, Gwenaëlle Creff, Sébastien Schmerber, Nicolas-Xavier Bonne, Christophe Vincent, Bernard Fraysse, Olivier Deguine, Nadège Costa","doi":"10.1007/s10198-024-01740-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR) of cochlear implantation in the treatment of adult patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective multicenter pragmatic study including a randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 155 subjects with SSD or AHL. Subjects chose a treatment option between: abstention, Contralateral Routing Of the Signal hearing aids, Bone Conduction Device or Cochlear Implant (CI). Participants who opted for CI were then randomized between two arms: \"immediate CI\" where the cochlear implantation was performed within one month and \"initial observation\" where subjects were first observed. The ICUR of CI was determined at 6 months follow-up by comparing the two arms. Utility was measured using EuroQoL- 5 dimensions (EQ-5D), to calculate the gain in Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY). Individual costs were extracted from the French National Health Insurance database. A Markovian MultiState (MMS) model assessed the ICUR evolution over the lifetime horizon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 155 included participants, 51 opted for a CI and were randomized. For a 6 months follow-up period, the ICUR was €422,279/QALY gained after CI. Using the MMS model, the ICUR of CI decreased to €57,561/QALY at 10 years follow-up, €38,006/QALY at 20 years, and dropped to €26,715 at 50 years. In the participants with severe tinnitus, mean ICUR was €31,105/QALY at 10 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CI can be considered as an efficient treatment in SSD and AHL from 20 years follow-up in the global population, and before 10 years follow-up in patients with severe associated tinnitus.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-utility of cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss: results of a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mathieu Marx, Michaël Mounié, Isabelle Mosnier, Frédéric Venail, Michel Mondain, Alain Uziel, David Bakhos, Emmanuel Lescanne, Yann N'Guyen, Daniele Bernardeschi, Olivier Sterkers, Benoit Godey, Gwenaëlle Creff, Sébastien Schmerber, Nicolas-Xavier Bonne, Christophe Vincent, Bernard Fraysse, Olivier Deguine, Nadège Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10198-024-01740-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR) of cochlear implantation in the treatment of adult patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective multicenter pragmatic study including a randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 155 subjects with SSD or AHL. Subjects chose a treatment option between: abstention, Contralateral Routing Of the Signal hearing aids, Bone Conduction Device or Cochlear Implant (CI). Participants who opted for CI were then randomized between two arms: \\\"immediate CI\\\" where the cochlear implantation was performed within one month and \\\"initial observation\\\" where subjects were first observed. The ICUR of CI was determined at 6 months follow-up by comparing the two arms. Utility was measured using EuroQoL- 5 dimensions (EQ-5D), to calculate the gain in Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY). Individual costs were extracted from the French National Health Insurance database. A Markovian MultiState (MMS) model assessed the ICUR evolution over the lifetime horizon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 155 included participants, 51 opted for a CI and were randomized. For a 6 months follow-up period, the ICUR was €422,279/QALY gained after CI. Using the MMS model, the ICUR of CI decreased to €57,561/QALY at 10 years follow-up, €38,006/QALY at 20 years, and dropped to €26,715 at 50 years. In the participants with severe tinnitus, mean ICUR was €31,105/QALY at 10 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CI can be considered as an efficient treatment in SSD and AHL from 20 years follow-up in the global population, and before 10 years follow-up in patients with severe associated tinnitus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-024-01740-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-024-01740-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定人工耳蜗植入治疗单侧耳聋(SSD)和非对称听力损失(AHL)成年患者的增量成本效用比(ICUR):这项前瞻性多中心实用研究包括一项随机对照试验(RCT),共招募了 155 名单侧耳聋或非对称听力损失患者。受试者在以下治疗方案中选择一种:放弃治疗、助听器信号对侧路由、骨传导设备或人工耳蜗(CI)。选择 CI 的受试者被随机分为两组:"立即植入人工耳蜗 "组在一个月内植入人工耳蜗,而 "初始观察 "组则首先对受试者进行观察。随访 6 个月时,通过比较两组受试者的情况,确定 CI 的 ICUR。效用采用欧洲质量生活 5 维度(EQ-5D)进行测量,以计算质量调整生命年(QALY)的收益。个人费用从法国国家健康保险数据库中提取。马尔可夫多态(MMS)模型评估了ICUR在整个生命周期内的演变情况:在纳入的 155 名参与者中,有 51 人选择了 CI 并接受了随机治疗。在 6 个月的随访期内,CI 后的 ICUR 为 422 279 欧元/QALY。使用 MMS 模型,CI 的 ICUR 在随访 10 年时降至 57,561 欧元/QALY,20 年时降至 38,006 欧元/QALY,50 年时降至 26,715 欧元。在重度耳鸣患者中,10 年的平均 ICUR 为 31,105 欧元/QALY:结论:在全球人群中,CI 在随访 20 年后可被视为治疗 SSD 和 AHL 的有效方法,而在随访 10 年前,对于伴有严重耳鸣的患者,CI 可被视为治疗 SSD 和 AHL 的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost-utility of cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Objectives: To determine the Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR) of cochlear implantation in the treatment of adult patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL).

Methods: This prospective multicenter pragmatic study including a randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 155 subjects with SSD or AHL. Subjects chose a treatment option between: abstention, Contralateral Routing Of the Signal hearing aids, Bone Conduction Device or Cochlear Implant (CI). Participants who opted for CI were then randomized between two arms: "immediate CI" where the cochlear implantation was performed within one month and "initial observation" where subjects were first observed. The ICUR of CI was determined at 6 months follow-up by comparing the two arms. Utility was measured using EuroQoL- 5 dimensions (EQ-5D), to calculate the gain in Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY). Individual costs were extracted from the French National Health Insurance database. A Markovian MultiState (MMS) model assessed the ICUR evolution over the lifetime horizon.

Results: Among the 155 included participants, 51 opted for a CI and were randomized. For a 6 months follow-up period, the ICUR was €422,279/QALY gained after CI. Using the MMS model, the ICUR of CI decreased to €57,561/QALY at 10 years follow-up, €38,006/QALY at 20 years, and dropped to €26,715 at 50 years. In the participants with severe tinnitus, mean ICUR was €31,105/QALY at 10 years.

Conclusions: CI can be considered as an efficient treatment in SSD and AHL from 20 years follow-up in the global population, and before 10 years follow-up in patients with severe associated tinnitus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
期刊最新文献
Changes in disposable income of Polish households and growing trends in alcohol mortality. Explaining variations in government health expenditure: evidence from Canada. The impact of different perspectives on the cost-effectiveness of remote patient monitoring for patients with heart failure in different European countries. Is there a link between health care utilisation and subjective well-being? An exploratory study among older Danes. Costs associated with insufficient physical activity in Germany: cross-sectional results from the baseline examination of the German national cohort (NAKO).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1