中危肺动脉高压患者使用肠外前列环素的情况:回顾性病历和横断面调查。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMC Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1186/s12890-024-03388-w
Anjali Vaidya, Margaret R Sketch, Meredith Broderick, Oksana A Shlobin
{"title":"中危肺动脉高压患者使用肠外前列环素的情况:回顾性病历和横断面调查。","authors":"Anjali Vaidya, Margaret R Sketch, Meredith Broderick, Oksana A Shlobin","doi":"10.1186/s12890-024-03388-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current clinical guidelines support use of parenteral prostacyclin therapy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at intermediate risk. The objective of this study was to assess parenteral prostacyclin therapy use among patients at intermediate risk according to the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) 2.0 four-strata risk assessment model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional online survey of healthcare professionals (HCPs). Included patients were classified as intermediate-low or intermediate-high risk per COMPERA 2.0 between 2016 and 2020 (index visit), initiated on a parenteral prostacyclin any time following intermediate risk assessment, and had World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (FC), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and B-type natriuretic peptide/N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP/NT-proBNP) assessments at index and first comprehensive follow-up visits (follow-up).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 139 HCPs (53% community-based, 47% Pulmonary Hypertension Care Center-based) participated in the survey and provided 350 patient records; among these, mean age (SD) was 54.1 (15.3) years and 52% were female. Median (IQR) time from parenteral prostacyclin initiation to follow-up was 3.0 months (2.0, 7.0). At parenteral prostacyclin initiation for the 280 patient records with available COMPERA 2.0 assessments, 62% of patients were intermediate-high risk, 33% were intermediate-low risk and 3% were low risk, improving to 38%, 53%, and 8%, respectively, at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improvements were seen for the individual COMPERA 2.0 risk calculator parameters and for several other clinical parameters. Findings from this study substantiate recent guidelines suggesting earlier use of this treatment in intermediate-risk patients with PAH.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parenteral prostacyclin utilization in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the intermediate-risk strata: a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Anjali Vaidya, Margaret R Sketch, Meredith Broderick, Oksana A Shlobin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12890-024-03388-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current clinical guidelines support use of parenteral prostacyclin therapy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at intermediate risk. The objective of this study was to assess parenteral prostacyclin therapy use among patients at intermediate risk according to the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) 2.0 four-strata risk assessment model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional online survey of healthcare professionals (HCPs). Included patients were classified as intermediate-low or intermediate-high risk per COMPERA 2.0 between 2016 and 2020 (index visit), initiated on a parenteral prostacyclin any time following intermediate risk assessment, and had World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (FC), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and B-type natriuretic peptide/N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP/NT-proBNP) assessments at index and first comprehensive follow-up visits (follow-up).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 139 HCPs (53% community-based, 47% Pulmonary Hypertension Care Center-based) participated in the survey and provided 350 patient records; among these, mean age (SD) was 54.1 (15.3) years and 52% were female. Median (IQR) time from parenteral prostacyclin initiation to follow-up was 3.0 months (2.0, 7.0). At parenteral prostacyclin initiation for the 280 patient records with available COMPERA 2.0 assessments, 62% of patients were intermediate-high risk, 33% were intermediate-low risk and 3% were low risk, improving to 38%, 53%, and 8%, respectively, at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improvements were seen for the individual COMPERA 2.0 risk calculator parameters and for several other clinical parameters. Findings from this study substantiate recent guidelines suggesting earlier use of this treatment in intermediate-risk patients with PAH.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577822/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03388-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03388-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前的临床指南支持中危肺动脉高压(PAH)患者使用肠外前列环素疗法。本研究的目的是根据肺动脉高压新疗法比较前瞻性登记(COMPERA)2.0 四层风险评估模型,评估中危患者使用肠外前列环素治疗的情况:这是一项回顾性病历审查和对医疗保健专业人员(HCP)的横断面在线调查。纳入的患者在 2016 年至 2020 年(指标访问)期间根据 COMPERA 2.0 被归类为中低风险或中高风险,在中级风险评估后的任何时间开始使用肠外前列环素,并在指标访问和首次全面随访(随访)时进行世界卫生组织(WHO)功能分级(FC)、6 分钟步行距离(6MWD)和 B 型钠尿肽/N 端原 B 型钠尿肽(BNP/NT-proBNP)评估:共有 139 名保健医生(53% 在社区工作,47% 在肺动脉高压护理中心工作)参与了调查,并提供了 350 份病历;其中,平均年龄(SD)为 54.1(15.3)岁,52% 为女性。从开始使用肠外前列环素到随访的时间中位数(IQR)为 3.0 个月(2.0,7.0)。在280份有COMPERA 2.0评估结果的病历中,62%的患者在开始使用肠外前列环素时属于中高风险,33%属于中低风险,3%属于低风险,在随访时分别降至38%、53%和8%:COMPERA 2.0 风险计算器的各项参数和其他几项临床参数均有所改善。这项研究的结果证实了近期指南的建议,即 PAH 中危患者应尽早使用这种治疗方法:临床试验编号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parenteral prostacyclin utilization in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the intermediate-risk strata: a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey.

Background: Current clinical guidelines support use of parenteral prostacyclin therapy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at intermediate risk. The objective of this study was to assess parenteral prostacyclin therapy use among patients at intermediate risk according to the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) 2.0 four-strata risk assessment model.

Methods: This was a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional online survey of healthcare professionals (HCPs). Included patients were classified as intermediate-low or intermediate-high risk per COMPERA 2.0 between 2016 and 2020 (index visit), initiated on a parenteral prostacyclin any time following intermediate risk assessment, and had World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (FC), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and B-type natriuretic peptide/N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP/NT-proBNP) assessments at index and first comprehensive follow-up visits (follow-up).

Results: A total of 139 HCPs (53% community-based, 47% Pulmonary Hypertension Care Center-based) participated in the survey and provided 350 patient records; among these, mean age (SD) was 54.1 (15.3) years and 52% were female. Median (IQR) time from parenteral prostacyclin initiation to follow-up was 3.0 months (2.0, 7.0). At parenteral prostacyclin initiation for the 280 patient records with available COMPERA 2.0 assessments, 62% of patients were intermediate-high risk, 33% were intermediate-low risk and 3% were low risk, improving to 38%, 53%, and 8%, respectively, at follow-up.

Conclusions: Improvements were seen for the individual COMPERA 2.0 risk calculator parameters and for several other clinical parameters. Findings from this study substantiate recent guidelines suggesting earlier use of this treatment in intermediate-risk patients with PAH.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Impact of vitamin D on hyperoxic acute lung injury in neonatal mice. Significance of respiratory virus coinfection in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Proposal of a radiation-free screening protocol for early detection of interstitial lung involvement in seropositive and ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis. Electrical impedance tomography guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration in critically ill and surgical adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Predictive value of direct bilirubin and total bile acid in lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with EGFR-TKIs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1