经导管二尖瓣瓣中瓣和瓣环植入术的临床结果:系统综述与元分析》。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31299
Khi Yung Fong, John Ming Yan Koh, Lip Wei Saw, Devy Anggreni, Ethel Zi Xie Ng, Yiong Huak Chan, Karl Poon, Dion Stub, Shih-Hsien Sung, Mann Chandavimol, Michael Kang-Yin Lee, Angus Shing Fung Chui, A B Gopalamurugan, Rajesh Nair, Yingqiang Guo, Mohammed Rizwan Amanullah, Victor Tar Toong Chao, See Hooi Ewe, Kay Woon Ho, Jonathan Yap
{"title":"经导管二尖瓣瓣中瓣和瓣环植入术的临床结果:系统综述与元分析》。","authors":"Khi Yung Fong, John Ming Yan Koh, Lip Wei Saw, Devy Anggreni, Ethel Zi Xie Ng, Yiong Huak Chan, Karl Poon, Dion Stub, Shih-Hsien Sung, Mann Chandavimol, Michael Kang-Yin Lee, Angus Shing Fung Chui, A B Gopalamurugan, Rajesh Nair, Yingqiang Guo, Mohammed Rizwan Amanullah, Victor Tar Toong Chao, See Hooi Ewe, Kay Woon Ho, Jonathan Yap","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter valve-in-valve (VIV) or valve-in-ring (VIR) therapies for degenerated mitral bioprosthetic valves and rings are still evolving. We aimed to characterize short- and long-term outcomes of these procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic literature search was conducted to retrieve articles describing mitral VIV or VIR implantation with at least 10 patients. Meta-analysis of proportions was carried out for 30-day or in-hospital outcomes of mortality, stroke, major bleeding, transfusion, acute kidney injury, procedural success, valve embolization, paravalvular leak, pacemaker implantation, and hospital stay. Individual patient data meta-analysis using Kaplan-Meier curve reconstruction was used to estimate long-term mortality of VIV, VIR and redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 34 studies (7047 patients). Pooled procedural success was 94.8% in VIV and 80.5% in VIR. Pooled short-term mortality and stroke risk was 6.4% and 1.9% respectively in VIV, 9.1% and 1.6% respectively in VIR, and 8.4% and 5.5% respectively in SMVR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides prognostic information on clinical outcomes for redo SMVR and transcatheter mitral VIV and VIR implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve-In-Valve and Valve-In-Ring Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Khi Yung Fong, John Ming Yan Koh, Lip Wei Saw, Devy Anggreni, Ethel Zi Xie Ng, Yiong Huak Chan, Karl Poon, Dion Stub, Shih-Hsien Sung, Mann Chandavimol, Michael Kang-Yin Lee, Angus Shing Fung Chui, A B Gopalamurugan, Rajesh Nair, Yingqiang Guo, Mohammed Rizwan Amanullah, Victor Tar Toong Chao, See Hooi Ewe, Kay Woon Ho, Jonathan Yap\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter valve-in-valve (VIV) or valve-in-ring (VIR) therapies for degenerated mitral bioprosthetic valves and rings are still evolving. We aimed to characterize short- and long-term outcomes of these procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic literature search was conducted to retrieve articles describing mitral VIV or VIR implantation with at least 10 patients. Meta-analysis of proportions was carried out for 30-day or in-hospital outcomes of mortality, stroke, major bleeding, transfusion, acute kidney injury, procedural success, valve embolization, paravalvular leak, pacemaker implantation, and hospital stay. Individual patient data meta-analysis using Kaplan-Meier curve reconstruction was used to estimate long-term mortality of VIV, VIR and redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 34 studies (7047 patients). Pooled procedural success was 94.8% in VIV and 80.5% in VIR. Pooled short-term mortality and stroke risk was 6.4% and 1.9% respectively in VIV, 9.1% and 1.6% respectively in VIR, and 8.4% and 5.5% respectively in SMVR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides prognostic information on clinical outcomes for redo SMVR and transcatheter mitral VIV and VIR implantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31299\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31299","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经导管瓣中瓣(VIV)或瓣环中瓣(VIR)治疗退化的二尖瓣生物人工瓣膜和瓣环的方法仍在不断发展。我们旨在描述这些手术的短期和长期疗效:我们进行了电子文献检索,检索了至少有 10 名患者接受过二尖瓣 VIV 或 VIR 植入术的文章。对30天或住院期间的死亡率、中风、大出血、输血、急性肾损伤、手术成功率、瓣膜栓塞、瓣膜旁漏、起搏器植入和住院时间等结果进行了比例荟萃分析。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线重建法对患者个体数据进行荟萃分析,以估算VIV、VIR和重做手术二尖瓣置换术(SMVR)的长期死亡率:我们分析了 34 项研究(7047 名患者)。VIV的汇总手术成功率为94.8%,VIR为80.5%。VIV的汇总短期死亡率和中风风险分别为6.4%和1.9%,VIR分别为9.1%和1.6%,SMVR分别为8.4%和5.5%:这项研究提供了重做 SMVR 和经导管二尖瓣 VIV 和 VIR 植入术的临床预后信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve-In-Valve and Valve-In-Ring Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Transcatheter valve-in-valve (VIV) or valve-in-ring (VIR) therapies for degenerated mitral bioprosthetic valves and rings are still evolving. We aimed to characterize short- and long-term outcomes of these procedures.

Methods: An electronic literature search was conducted to retrieve articles describing mitral VIV or VIR implantation with at least 10 patients. Meta-analysis of proportions was carried out for 30-day or in-hospital outcomes of mortality, stroke, major bleeding, transfusion, acute kidney injury, procedural success, valve embolization, paravalvular leak, pacemaker implantation, and hospital stay. Individual patient data meta-analysis using Kaplan-Meier curve reconstruction was used to estimate long-term mortality of VIV, VIR and redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR).

Results: We analyzed 34 studies (7047 patients). Pooled procedural success was 94.8% in VIV and 80.5% in VIR. Pooled short-term mortality and stroke risk was 6.4% and 1.9% respectively in VIV, 9.1% and 1.6% respectively in VIR, and 8.4% and 5.5% respectively in SMVR.

Conclusions: This study provides prognostic information on clinical outcomes for redo SMVR and transcatheter mitral VIV and VIR implantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
期刊最新文献
Edoxaban Monotherapy and Incidence of Transcatheter Heart Valve Leaflet Thrombosis - The Rotterdam Edoxaban (REDOX) Study. Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of Post Myocardial Infarct Ventricular Septal Rupture After Surgical Patch Dehiscence. Acute Stent Thrombosis Following Reprotrusion of a Calcified Nodule in the Left Main Coronary Artery. Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve-In-Valve and Valve-In-Ring Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iatrogenic Aortocoronary Dissection During Coronary Intervention: A Case Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1