接受肾脏替代疗法的重症患者出现肾内低血压的预测因素:系统综述。

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Intensive Care Medicine Experimental Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1186/s40635-024-00695-8
Rafaella Maria C Lyrio, Etienne Macedo, Raghavan Murugan, Arnaldo A da Silva, Tess M Calcagno, Estevão F Sampaio, Rafael H Sassi, Rogério da Hora Passos
{"title":"接受肾脏替代疗法的重症患者出现肾内低血压的预测因素:系统综述。","authors":"Rafaella Maria C Lyrio, Etienne Macedo, Raghavan Murugan, Arnaldo A da Silva, Tess M Calcagno, Estevão F Sampaio, Rafael H Sassi, Rogério da Hora Passos","doi":"10.1186/s40635-024-00695-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review aims to identify predictors of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) in critically ill patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy (KRT) for acute kidney injury (AKI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed was conducted from 2002 to April 2024. Studies included critically ill adults undergoing KRT for AKI, excluding pediatric patients, non-critically ill individuals, those with chronic kidney disease, and those not undergoing KRT. The primary outcome was identifying predictive tools for hypotensive episodes during KRT sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review analyzed data from 8 studies involving 2873 patients. Various machine learning models were assessed for their predictive accuracy. The Extreme Gradient Boosting Machine (XGB) model was the top performer with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.828 (95% CI 0.796-0.861), closely followed by the deep neural network (DNN) with an AUROC of 0.822 (95% CI 0.789-0.856). All machine learning models outperformed other predictors. The SOCRATE score, which includes cardiovascular SOFA score, index capillary refill, and lactate level, had an AUROC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.69-0.89, p < 0.0001). Peripheral perfusion index (PPI) and heart rate variability (HRV) showed AUROCs of 0.721 (95% CI 0.547-0.857) and 0.761 (95% CI 0.59-0.887), respectively. Pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI) and mechanical ventilation also demonstrated significant diagnostic performance. A PVPI ≥ 1.6 at the onset of intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) sessions predicted IDH associated with preload dependence with a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI 59-100%) and specificity of 53% (95% CI 42-63%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review shows how combining predictive models with clinical indicators can forecast IDH in critically ill AKI patients undergoing KRT, with validation in diverse settings needed to improve accuracy and patient care strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"12 1","pages":"106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of intradialytic hypotension in critically ill patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Rafaella Maria C Lyrio, Etienne Macedo, Raghavan Murugan, Arnaldo A da Silva, Tess M Calcagno, Estevão F Sampaio, Rafael H Sassi, Rogério da Hora Passos\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40635-024-00695-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review aims to identify predictors of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) in critically ill patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy (KRT) for acute kidney injury (AKI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed was conducted from 2002 to April 2024. Studies included critically ill adults undergoing KRT for AKI, excluding pediatric patients, non-critically ill individuals, those with chronic kidney disease, and those not undergoing KRT. The primary outcome was identifying predictive tools for hypotensive episodes during KRT sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review analyzed data from 8 studies involving 2873 patients. Various machine learning models were assessed for their predictive accuracy. The Extreme Gradient Boosting Machine (XGB) model was the top performer with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.828 (95% CI 0.796-0.861), closely followed by the deep neural network (DNN) with an AUROC of 0.822 (95% CI 0.789-0.856). All machine learning models outperformed other predictors. The SOCRATE score, which includes cardiovascular SOFA score, index capillary refill, and lactate level, had an AUROC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.69-0.89, p < 0.0001). Peripheral perfusion index (PPI) and heart rate variability (HRV) showed AUROCs of 0.721 (95% CI 0.547-0.857) and 0.761 (95% CI 0.59-0.887), respectively. Pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI) and mechanical ventilation also demonstrated significant diagnostic performance. A PVPI ≥ 1.6 at the onset of intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) sessions predicted IDH associated with preload dependence with a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI 59-100%) and specificity of 53% (95% CI 42-63%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review shows how combining predictive models with clinical indicators can forecast IDH in critically ill AKI patients undergoing KRT, with validation in diverse settings needed to improve accuracy and patient care strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00695-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00695-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本系统性综述旨在确定因急性肾损伤(AKI)而接受肾替代治疗(KRT)的重症患者出现析出内低血压(IDH)的预测因素:本系统性综述旨在确定因急性肾损伤(AKI)而接受肾脏替代治疗(KRT)的重症患者析出内低血压(IDH)的预测因素:方法:对 2002 年至 2024 年 4 月期间的 PubMed 进行了全面检索。研究对象包括因 AKI 而接受 KRT 治疗的重症成人患者,不包括儿科患者、非重症患者、慢性肾脏病患者以及未接受 KRT 治疗的患者。主要结果是确定 KRT 过程中低血压发作的预测工具:综述分析了 8 项研究的数据,涉及 2873 名患者。对各种机器学习模型的预测准确性进行了评估。极端梯度提升机(XGB)模型表现最佳,其接收者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为 0.828(95% CI 0.796-0.861),深度神经网络(DNN)紧随其后,其接收者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为 0.822(95% CI 0.789-0.856)。所有机器学习模型的表现都优于其他预测指标。SOCRATE 评分(包括心血管 SOFA 评分、毛细血管再充盈指数和乳酸水平)的 AUROC 为 0.79(95% CI 0.69-0.89,p 结论:SOCRATE 评分的 AUROC 为 0.79(95% CI 0.69-0.89,p 结论):该系统性综述表明,将预测模型与临床指标相结合可预测接受 KRT 的 AKI 重症患者的 IDH,但需要在不同环境中进行验证,以提高准确性并改进患者护理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of intradialytic hypotension in critically ill patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy: a systematic review.

Background: This systematic review aims to identify predictors of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) in critically ill patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy (KRT) for acute kidney injury (AKI).

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed was conducted from 2002 to April 2024. Studies included critically ill adults undergoing KRT for AKI, excluding pediatric patients, non-critically ill individuals, those with chronic kidney disease, and those not undergoing KRT. The primary outcome was identifying predictive tools for hypotensive episodes during KRT sessions.

Results: The review analyzed data from 8 studies involving 2873 patients. Various machine learning models were assessed for their predictive accuracy. The Extreme Gradient Boosting Machine (XGB) model was the top performer with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.828 (95% CI 0.796-0.861), closely followed by the deep neural network (DNN) with an AUROC of 0.822 (95% CI 0.789-0.856). All machine learning models outperformed other predictors. The SOCRATE score, which includes cardiovascular SOFA score, index capillary refill, and lactate level, had an AUROC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.69-0.89, p < 0.0001). Peripheral perfusion index (PPI) and heart rate variability (HRV) showed AUROCs of 0.721 (95% CI 0.547-0.857) and 0.761 (95% CI 0.59-0.887), respectively. Pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI) and mechanical ventilation also demonstrated significant diagnostic performance. A PVPI ≥ 1.6 at the onset of intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) sessions predicted IDH associated with preload dependence with a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI 59-100%) and specificity of 53% (95% CI 42-63%).

Conclusion: This systematic review shows how combining predictive models with clinical indicators can forecast IDH in critically ill AKI patients undergoing KRT, with validation in diverse settings needed to improve accuracy and patient care strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictors of intradialytic hypotension in critically ill patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy: a systematic review. Is passive leg raising clinically useful in predicting intradialytic hypotension? Largely ignored-but pathogenetically significant: ambient temperature in rodent sepsis models. The development of a C5.0 machine learning model in a limited data set to predict early mortality in patients with ARDS undergoing an initial session of prone positioning. A new method to predict return of spontaneous circulation by peripheral intravenous analysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a rat model pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1