不同摄食习惯淡水鱼肠道微生物群的比较研究:城市湖泊案例研究

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES Journal of fish biology Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1111/jfb.16002
Zaitian Li, Junsheng Lv, Jun Chen, Fengzhu Sun, Ruozhu Sheng, Yueyun Qin, Lihua Rao, Tao Lu, Liwei Sun
{"title":"不同摄食习惯淡水鱼肠道微生物群的比较研究:城市湖泊案例研究","authors":"Zaitian Li, Junsheng Lv, Jun Chen, Fengzhu Sun, Ruozhu Sheng, Yueyun Qin, Lihua Rao, Tao Lu, Liwei Sun","doi":"10.1111/jfb.16002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in various physiological functions of the host and can be modulated by numerous factors, including feeding habit or trophic level. In this study, the impact of host feeding habits on the gut microbiota of freshwater fish was explored. Ten fish species, classified into four feeding habit categories (herbivorous, omnivorous, planktivorous, and carnivorous) were sampled from West Lake, a renowned urban scenic lake, and their gut content microbiota was analysed using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. A total of 2531 operational taxonomic units, belonging to 34 bacterial phyla, were identified, with 33.4% shared across all feeding habits. Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were the predominant phyla. However, at the family level, Peptostreptococcaceae and Clostridiaceae_1 were the most dominant. Microbiota composition diversity was highest in herbivorous fish, followed by omnivores, carnivores, and planktivores. Statistically significant differences in microbiota diversity were found between different feeding categories, except for the omnivores, which did not differ from the carnivores or planktivores. The most abundant predicted metabolic pathways across all feeding habits were similar, with amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, and metabolism of other amino acids being dominant. However, comparing the relative abundance of gene functions between different feeding habits revealed notable variations across most comparisons. Co-occurrence network analysis for each feeding habit revealed that all networks were dominated by the strong positive correlation among pairs of bacterial genera abundances, while the basic properties varied, implying differences in gut microbiota interactions based on the feeding habit. In conclusion, these results confirmed that the feeding habit could affect the structure and composition of the gut content microbiota but also changed their functions and interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15794,"journal":{"name":"Journal of fish biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of gut content microbiota in freshwater fish with different feeding habits: A case study of an urban lake.\",\"authors\":\"Zaitian Li, Junsheng Lv, Jun Chen, Fengzhu Sun, Ruozhu Sheng, Yueyun Qin, Lihua Rao, Tao Lu, Liwei Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfb.16002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in various physiological functions of the host and can be modulated by numerous factors, including feeding habit or trophic level. In this study, the impact of host feeding habits on the gut microbiota of freshwater fish was explored. Ten fish species, classified into four feeding habit categories (herbivorous, omnivorous, planktivorous, and carnivorous) were sampled from West Lake, a renowned urban scenic lake, and their gut content microbiota was analysed using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. A total of 2531 operational taxonomic units, belonging to 34 bacterial phyla, were identified, with 33.4% shared across all feeding habits. Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were the predominant phyla. However, at the family level, Peptostreptococcaceae and Clostridiaceae_1 were the most dominant. Microbiota composition diversity was highest in herbivorous fish, followed by omnivores, carnivores, and planktivores. Statistically significant differences in microbiota diversity were found between different feeding categories, except for the omnivores, which did not differ from the carnivores or planktivores. The most abundant predicted metabolic pathways across all feeding habits were similar, with amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, and metabolism of other amino acids being dominant. However, comparing the relative abundance of gene functions between different feeding habits revealed notable variations across most comparisons. Co-occurrence network analysis for each feeding habit revealed that all networks were dominated by the strong positive correlation among pairs of bacterial genera abundances, while the basic properties varied, implying differences in gut microbiota interactions based on the feeding habit. In conclusion, these results confirmed that the feeding habit could affect the structure and composition of the gut content microbiota but also changed their functions and interactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of fish biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of fish biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.16002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of fish biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.16002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肠道微生物群对宿主的各种生理功能起着至关重要的作用,并可受多种因素(包括摄食习惯或营养级)的调节。本研究探讨了宿主摄食习惯对淡水鱼肠道微生物群的影响。研究人员在著名的城市风景湖泊西湖中采集了 10 种鱼类的样本,将其分为 4 种摄食习性类别(草食性、杂食性、板食性和肉食性),并利用 16S 核糖体 RNA 基因测序分析了其肠道微生物群。共鉴定出隶属于 34 个细菌门的 2531 个可操作分类单元,其中 33.4% 的单元在所有摄食习性中共享。固着菌和变形菌是主要的菌门。然而,在科一级,Peptostreptococcaceae 和 Clostridiaceae_1 是最主要的。草食性鱼类的微生物群组成多样性最高,其次是杂食性鱼类、肉食性鱼类和板食性鱼类。除杂食性鱼类与肉食性鱼类和板食性鱼类没有差异外,不同食性鱼类的微生物群多样性在统计学上存在明显差异。在所有摄食习惯中,预测的最丰富代谢途径相似,氨基酸代谢、碳水化合物代谢、辅因子和维生素代谢以及其他氨基酸代谢占主导地位。然而,比较不同摄食习性基因功能的相对丰度发现,大多数比较结果都存在明显差异。对每种摄食习性的共生网络分析显示,所有网络都以细菌属丰度对之间的强正相关性为主,而基本属性则各不相同,这意味着肠道微生物群的相互作用因摄食习性而异。总之,这些结果证实,进食习惯会影响肠道内容微生物群的结构和组成,同时也会改变它们的功能和相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study of gut content microbiota in freshwater fish with different feeding habits: A case study of an urban lake.

The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in various physiological functions of the host and can be modulated by numerous factors, including feeding habit or trophic level. In this study, the impact of host feeding habits on the gut microbiota of freshwater fish was explored. Ten fish species, classified into four feeding habit categories (herbivorous, omnivorous, planktivorous, and carnivorous) were sampled from West Lake, a renowned urban scenic lake, and their gut content microbiota was analysed using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. A total of 2531 operational taxonomic units, belonging to 34 bacterial phyla, were identified, with 33.4% shared across all feeding habits. Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were the predominant phyla. However, at the family level, Peptostreptococcaceae and Clostridiaceae_1 were the most dominant. Microbiota composition diversity was highest in herbivorous fish, followed by omnivores, carnivores, and planktivores. Statistically significant differences in microbiota diversity were found between different feeding categories, except for the omnivores, which did not differ from the carnivores or planktivores. The most abundant predicted metabolic pathways across all feeding habits were similar, with amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, and metabolism of other amino acids being dominant. However, comparing the relative abundance of gene functions between different feeding habits revealed notable variations across most comparisons. Co-occurrence network analysis for each feeding habit revealed that all networks were dominated by the strong positive correlation among pairs of bacterial genera abundances, while the basic properties varied, implying differences in gut microbiota interactions based on the feeding habit. In conclusion, these results confirmed that the feeding habit could affect the structure and composition of the gut content microbiota but also changed their functions and interactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of fish biology
Journal of fish biology 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
292
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Fish Biology is a leading international journal for scientists engaged in all aspects of fishes and fisheries research, both fresh water and marine. The journal publishes high-quality papers relevant to the central theme of fish biology and aims to bring together under one cover an overall picture of the research in progress and to provide international communication among researchers in many disciplines with a common interest in the biology of fish.
期刊最新文献
Comparative study of gut content microbiota in freshwater fish with different feeding habits: A case study of an urban lake. Swimming kinematics of deep-sea fishes. Comparing remote and hand-held video observation methods for quantifying a cleaning mutualism. New bass on the block: Trophic interactions among invasive largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides and local sportfish. Oreichthys warjaintia, a new species of cyprinid fish from Meghalaya, India (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1