使用干血斑进行核酸扩增检测,以确诊成人是否感染 HIV-1。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY Journal of Clinical Virology Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105746
Benjamin A Pinsky, Malaya K Sahoo, Justen Manasa, Tariro Makadzange, Carole L Wallis, Ed G Marins, Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy, John A Bartlett, Ronald J Bosch, Dennis Israelski, David A Katzenstein
{"title":"使用干血斑进行核酸扩增检测,以确诊成人是否感染 HIV-1。","authors":"Benjamin A Pinsky, Malaya K Sahoo, Justen Manasa, Tariro Makadzange, Carole L Wallis, Ed G Marins, Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy, John A Bartlett, Ronald J Bosch, Dennis Israelski, David A Katzenstein","doi":"10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The WHO HIV testing algorithm for high prevalence populations recommends the use of three different serologic assays, though this approach may lead to diagnostic misclassification. The study objective was to compare dried blood spot (DBS)-based HIV-1 nucleic acid detection methods to determine their suitability to confirm the diagnosis of HIV-1 in adults generally with suppressed or low-level plasma HIV-1 RNA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four methods were evaluated: Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 Qual Assay (Xpert), Hologic Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay (Aptima), Roche Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test, v.2.0 (CAP/CTM) with guanidinium-based sample pre-extraction buffer (SPEX), or CAP/CTM with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Testing was performed on 163 DBS samples collected from participants with HIV-1 in the AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) A5230 study (73 samples) and the Peninsula AIDS Research Cohort (PARC) study (90 samples).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Xpert and SPEX CAP/CTM [96.9 % (158/163):95.7 % (156/163); P = 0.75) showed similar sensitivity. However, PBS CAP/CTM and Aptima demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity, 68.2 % (107/157) and 69.2 % (99/143), respectively, compared to Xpert and SPEX CAP/CTM (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Overall agreement between Xpert and SPEX CAP/CTM was 93.9 % (153/163), including 152 DBS samples in which both methods detected HIV-1 nucleic acids.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Xpert and SPEX CAP/CTM provide sensitive performance for the detection of HIV-1 nucleic acids using DBS collected from adults living with HIV-1, including those with suppressed virus loads. Given the cost and side-effects associated with inappropriate life-long antiretroviral therapy, these assays may play a role in diagnosing HIV-1 infection in individuals with suspected false-positive serologic testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":15517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Virology","volume":"175 ","pages":"105746"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nucleic acid amplification testing using dried blood spots to confirm the diagnosis of HIV-1 in adults.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin A Pinsky, Malaya K Sahoo, Justen Manasa, Tariro Makadzange, Carole L Wallis, Ed G Marins, Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy, John A Bartlett, Ronald J Bosch, Dennis Israelski, David A Katzenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The WHO HIV testing algorithm for high prevalence populations recommends the use of three different serologic assays, though this approach may lead to diagnostic misclassification. The study objective was to compare dried blood spot (DBS)-based HIV-1 nucleic acid detection methods to determine their suitability to confirm the diagnosis of HIV-1 in adults generally with suppressed or low-level plasma HIV-1 RNA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four methods were evaluated: Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 Qual Assay (Xpert), Hologic Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay (Aptima), Roche Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test, v.2.0 (CAP/CTM) with guanidinium-based sample pre-extraction buffer (SPEX), or CAP/CTM with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Testing was performed on 163 DBS samples collected from participants with HIV-1 in the AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) A5230 study (73 samples) and the Peninsula AIDS Research Cohort (PARC) study (90 samples).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Xpert and SPEX CAP/CTM [96.9 % (158/163):95.7 % (156/163); P = 0.75) showed similar sensitivity. However, PBS CAP/CTM and Aptima demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity, 68.2 % (107/157) and 69.2 % (99/143), respectively, compared to Xpert and SPEX CAP/CTM (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Overall agreement between Xpert and SPEX CAP/CTM was 93.9 % (153/163), including 152 DBS samples in which both methods detected HIV-1 nucleic acids.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Xpert and SPEX CAP/CTM provide sensitive performance for the detection of HIV-1 nucleic acids using DBS collected from adults living with HIV-1, including those with suppressed virus loads. Given the cost and side-effects associated with inappropriate life-long antiretroviral therapy, these assays may play a role in diagnosing HIV-1 infection in individuals with suspected false-positive serologic testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Virology\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"105746\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105746\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105746","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:世界卫生组织针对高发人群的艾滋病检测算法建议使用三种不同的血清学检测方法,但这种方法可能会导致诊断分类错误。本研究的目的是比较基于干血斑(DBS)的 HIV-1 核酸检测方法,以确定这些方法是否适合用于确诊血浆 HIV-1 RNA 一般处于抑制或低水平的成人的 HIV-1:方法:对四种方法进行了评估:方法: 对四种方法进行了评估:Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 Qual Assay (Xpert)、Hologic Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay (Aptima)、Roche Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test, v.2.0 (CAP/CTM)与胍基样品预提取缓冲液 (SPEX) 或 CAP/CTM 与磷酸盐缓冲盐水 (PBS)。我们对从艾滋病临床试验小组(ACTG)A5230 研究(73 个样本)和半岛艾滋病研究队列(PARC)研究(90 个样本)的 HIV-1 参与者身上采集的 163 份 DBS 样本进行了检测:Xpert 和 SPEX CAP/CTM [96.9 % (158/163):95.7 % (156/163); P = 0.75]显示出相似的灵敏度。然而,与 Xpert 和 SPEX CAP/CTM 相比,PBS CAP/CTM 和 Aptima 的灵敏度明显较低,分别为 68.2 % (107/157) 和 69.2 % (99/143)(所有比较中 P < 0.0001)。Xpert和SPEX CAP/CTM的总体一致性为93.9%(153/163),其中152份DBS样本中两种方法都检测到了HIV-1核酸:结论:Xpert 和 SPEX CAP/CTM 在使用从成年 HIV-1 感染者(包括病毒载量受到抑制者)采集的 DBS 检测 HIV-1 核酸方面具有灵敏的性能。考虑到不适当的终身抗逆转录病毒疗法所带来的成本和副作用,这些检测方法可在诊断血清学检测假阳性的 HIV-1 感染者时发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nucleic acid amplification testing using dried blood spots to confirm the diagnosis of HIV-1 in adults.

Background: The WHO HIV testing algorithm for high prevalence populations recommends the use of three different serologic assays, though this approach may lead to diagnostic misclassification. The study objective was to compare dried blood spot (DBS)-based HIV-1 nucleic acid detection methods to determine their suitability to confirm the diagnosis of HIV-1 in adults generally with suppressed or low-level plasma HIV-1 RNA.

Methods: Four methods were evaluated: Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 Qual Assay (Xpert), Hologic Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay (Aptima), Roche Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test, v.2.0 (CAP/CTM) with guanidinium-based sample pre-extraction buffer (SPEX), or CAP/CTM with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Testing was performed on 163 DBS samples collected from participants with HIV-1 in the AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) A5230 study (73 samples) and the Peninsula AIDS Research Cohort (PARC) study (90 samples).

Results: Xpert and SPEX CAP/CTM [96.9 % (158/163):95.7 % (156/163); P = 0.75) showed similar sensitivity. However, PBS CAP/CTM and Aptima demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity, 68.2 % (107/157) and 69.2 % (99/143), respectively, compared to Xpert and SPEX CAP/CTM (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Overall agreement between Xpert and SPEX CAP/CTM was 93.9 % (153/163), including 152 DBS samples in which both methods detected HIV-1 nucleic acids.

Conclusions: Xpert and SPEX CAP/CTM provide sensitive performance for the detection of HIV-1 nucleic acids using DBS collected from adults living with HIV-1, including those with suppressed virus loads. Given the cost and side-effects associated with inappropriate life-long antiretroviral therapy, these assays may play a role in diagnosing HIV-1 infection in individuals with suspected false-positive serologic testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Virology
Journal of Clinical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
1.10%
发文量
149
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Virology, an esteemed international publication, serves as the official journal for both the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology and The European Society for Clinical Virology. Dedicated to advancing the understanding of human virology in clinical settings, the Journal of Clinical Virology focuses on disseminating research papers and reviews pertaining to the clinical aspects of virology. Its scope encompasses articles discussing diagnostic methodologies and virus-induced clinical conditions, with an emphasis on practicality and relevance to clinical practice. The journal publishes on topics that include: • new diagnostic technologies • nucleic acid amplification and serologic testing • targeted and metagenomic next-generation sequencing • emerging pandemic viral threats • respiratory viruses • transplant viruses • chronic viral infections • cancer-associated viruses • gastrointestinal viruses • central nervous system viruses • one health (excludes animal health)
期刊最新文献
Nucleic acid amplification testing using dried blood spots to confirm the diagnosis of HIV-1 in adults. Quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) viral load in plasma: Comparison of three commercial assays. Coinfections and iterative detection of respiratory viruses among 17,689 patients between March 2021 and December 2022 in Southern France Performance evaluation of the Abbott Alinity Hepatitis C antigen next assay in a US urban emergency department population Standardization and evaluation of an in-house ELISA for the detection of rabies antibody in a tertiary care centre in South India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1