为肺结核患者提供个性化护理:2013 年至 2021 年英国肺结核网络强化病例管理评估。

JRSM Open Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1177/20542704241290486
Tim Crocker-Buque, Harry Hayden, Jacqui White, Jennifer Dekoningh, Moerida Belton, Narinder Boparai, James Brown, Mike Brown, Danielle Hawley, Stefan Lozewicz, Rob Miller, Rachel Moores, Karyn Moshal, Jessica Potter, Marc Lipman
{"title":"为肺结核患者提供个性化护理:2013 年至 2021 年英国肺结核网络强化病例管理评估。","authors":"Tim Crocker-Buque, Harry Hayden, Jacqui White, Jennifer Dekoningh, Moerida Belton, Narinder Boparai, James Brown, Mike Brown, Danielle Hawley, Stefan Lozewicz, Rob Miller, Rachel Moores, Karyn Moshal, Jessica Potter, Marc Lipman","doi":"10.1177/20542704241290486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluating the outcomes of enhanced case management (ECM) for patients with tuberculosis (TB) in the North Central London TB Service (NCLTBS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The NCLTBS provides care for persons diagnosed with TB across north and central London. Management involves both medical and psychosocial support, leading to the implementation ECM to provide additional non-clinical assistance to patients at risk of treatment non-completion. However, there has been limited evaluation of its outcomes.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All adults with TB notified to NCLTBS between January 2013 and June 2021.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Descriptive socio-economic and clinical characteristics grouped by binary ECM status (yes/no) and level (0-3). Clinical outcomes at 12 months (completed treatment, death, lost-to-follow-up, continuing on treatment) were compared using multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally, 2437 patients were included (57.2% male, 79.1% born outside the UK). Overall, 82.3% completed treatment and 4.1% died. Factors associated with mortality included older age (over 70 years odds ratio (OR) 3.3), inpatient diagnosis (OR 4.4), and mental health issues (OR 2.2). 52.8% received ECM, with the proportion increasing over time, and 76% of this group successfully competed treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This comprehensive evaluation of ECM in a diverse London population indicates high treatment completion rates even among those with multiple social risk factors. However, ECM needs of patients has increased over time, with a particular rise in patients requiring the highest support level. Given the small difference between standard care and ECM categories 1 and 2, there may be scope to simplify the system.</p>","PeriodicalId":17674,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Open","volume":"15 10","pages":"20542704241290486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Providing personalised care for people with tuberculosis: an evaluation of enhanced case management in a UK TB Network 2013 to 2021.\",\"authors\":\"Tim Crocker-Buque, Harry Hayden, Jacqui White, Jennifer Dekoningh, Moerida Belton, Narinder Boparai, James Brown, Mike Brown, Danielle Hawley, Stefan Lozewicz, Rob Miller, Rachel Moores, Karyn Moshal, Jessica Potter, Marc Lipman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20542704241290486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluating the outcomes of enhanced case management (ECM) for patients with tuberculosis (TB) in the North Central London TB Service (NCLTBS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The NCLTBS provides care for persons diagnosed with TB across north and central London. Management involves both medical and psychosocial support, leading to the implementation ECM to provide additional non-clinical assistance to patients at risk of treatment non-completion. However, there has been limited evaluation of its outcomes.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All adults with TB notified to NCLTBS between January 2013 and June 2021.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Descriptive socio-economic and clinical characteristics grouped by binary ECM status (yes/no) and level (0-3). Clinical outcomes at 12 months (completed treatment, death, lost-to-follow-up, continuing on treatment) were compared using multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally, 2437 patients were included (57.2% male, 79.1% born outside the UK). Overall, 82.3% completed treatment and 4.1% died. Factors associated with mortality included older age (over 70 years odds ratio (OR) 3.3), inpatient diagnosis (OR 4.4), and mental health issues (OR 2.2). 52.8% received ECM, with the proportion increasing over time, and 76% of this group successfully competed treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This comprehensive evaluation of ECM in a diverse London population indicates high treatment completion rates even among those with multiple social risk factors. However, ECM needs of patients has increased over time, with a particular rise in patients requiring the highest support level. Given the small difference between standard care and ECM categories 1 and 2, there may be scope to simplify the system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JRSM Open\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"20542704241290486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574889/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JRSM Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20542704241290486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20542704241290486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:评估伦敦中北部结核病服务机构对结核病患者实施强化病例管理(ECM)的效果:评估伦敦中北部结核病服务机构(NCLTBS)对结核病患者实施强化病例管理(ECM)的效果:设计:回顾性队列研究:NCLTBS 为伦敦北部和中部的结核病患者提供治疗。管理涉及医疗和社会心理支持,因此实施了 ECM,为有可能无法完成治疗的患者提供额外的非临床帮助。然而,对其结果的评估却很有限:主要结果测量:描述性社会经济和临床特征,按二元 ECM 状态(是/否)和水平(0-3)分组。使用多变量逻辑回归对 12 个月的临床结果(完成治疗、死亡、失去随访、继续治疗)进行比较:共纳入 2437 名患者(57.2% 为男性,79.1% 在英国以外出生)。总体而言,82.3%的患者完成了治疗,4.1%的患者死亡。与死亡率相关的因素包括年龄较大(70 岁以上的几率比(OR)为 3.3)、住院诊断(OR 4.4)和精神健康问题(OR 2.2)。52.8%的患者接受了 ECM 治疗,这一比例随着时间的推移而增加,其中 76% 的患者成功完成了治疗:这项针对伦敦不同人群的 ECM 综合评估表明,即使是具有多种社会风险因素的患者,其治疗完成率也很高。然而,随着时间的推移,患者对 ECM 的需求也在增加,尤其是需要最高级别支持的患者。鉴于标准护理与 ECM 1 类和 2 类之间的差异很小,可能还有简化系统的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Providing personalised care for people with tuberculosis: an evaluation of enhanced case management in a UK TB Network 2013 to 2021.

Objectives: Evaluating the outcomes of enhanced case management (ECM) for patients with tuberculosis (TB) in the North Central London TB Service (NCLTBS).

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: The NCLTBS provides care for persons diagnosed with TB across north and central London. Management involves both medical and psychosocial support, leading to the implementation ECM to provide additional non-clinical assistance to patients at risk of treatment non-completion. However, there has been limited evaluation of its outcomes.

Participants: All adults with TB notified to NCLTBS between January 2013 and June 2021.

Main outcome measures: Descriptive socio-economic and clinical characteristics grouped by binary ECM status (yes/no) and level (0-3). Clinical outcomes at 12 months (completed treatment, death, lost-to-follow-up, continuing on treatment) were compared using multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Totally, 2437 patients were included (57.2% male, 79.1% born outside the UK). Overall, 82.3% completed treatment and 4.1% died. Factors associated with mortality included older age (over 70 years odds ratio (OR) 3.3), inpatient diagnosis (OR 4.4), and mental health issues (OR 2.2). 52.8% received ECM, with the proportion increasing over time, and 76% of this group successfully competed treatment.

Conclusions: This comprehensive evaluation of ECM in a diverse London population indicates high treatment completion rates even among those with multiple social risk factors. However, ECM needs of patients has increased over time, with a particular rise in patients requiring the highest support level. Given the small difference between standard care and ECM categories 1 and 2, there may be scope to simplify the system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JRSM Open is a peer reviewed online-only journal that follows the open-access publishing model. It is a companion journal to the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. The journal publishes research papers, research letters, clinical and methodological reviews, and case reports. Our aim is to inform practice and policy making in clinical medicine. The journal has an international and multispecialty readership that includes primary care and public health professionals.
期刊最新文献
Providing personalised care for people with tuberculosis: an evaluation of enhanced case management in a UK TB Network 2013 to 2021. Redeployment experiences of healthcare workers in the UK during COVID-19: a cross-sectional analysis from the nationwide UK-REACH study. Surgical reconstruction for spasticity and contracture: An underutilised rehabilitative strategy of adult stroke. Long COVID symptoms and demographic associations: A retrospective case series study using healthcare application data. Racial microaggressions within the UK Healthcare System: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1