在质子-光子联合治疗中优化利用肝癌患者的有限质子资源。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Physics in medicine and biology Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/ad94c8
Louise Marc, Jan Unkelbach
{"title":"在质子-光子联合治疗中优化利用肝癌患者的有限质子资源。","authors":"Louise Marc, Jan Unkelbach","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad94c8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Liver cancer patients may benefit from proton therapy through increase of the tumor control probability (TCP). However, proton therapy is a limited resource and may not be available for all patients. We consider combined proton-photon liver SBRT treatments (CPPT) where only some fractions are delivered with protons. It is investigated how limited proton fractions can be used best for individual patients and optimally allocated within a patient group.&#xD;&#xD;Approach: Photon and proton treatment plans were created for five liver cancer patients. In CPPT, limited proton fractions may be optimally exploited by increasing the fraction dose compared to photon fraction dose. To determine a patient's optimal proton and photon fraction dose, we maximize the target BED while constraining the mean normal liver BED, which leads to an up- or downscaling of the proton and photon plan, respectively. The resulting CPPT balances the benefits of fractionation in the normal liver versus exploiting the superior proton dose distributions. After converting the target BED to TCP, the optimal number of proton fractions per patient is determined by maximizing the overall TCP of the patient group.&#xD;&#xD;Main results: For the individual patient, a CPPT treatment that delivers a higher fraction dose with protons than photons allows for dose escalation in the target compared to delivering the same proton and photon fraction dose. On the level of a patient group, CPPT may allow to distribute limited proton slots over several patients. Through an optimal use and allocation of proton fractions, CPPT may increase the average patient group TCP compared to a proton patient selection strategy where patients receive single-modality proton or photon treatments.&#xD;&#xD;Significance: Limited proton resources can be optimally exploited via CPPT by increasing the target dose in proton fractions and allocating available proton slots to patients with the highest TCP increase.&#xD.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal use of limited proton resources for liver cancer patients in combined proton-photon treatments.\",\"authors\":\"Louise Marc, Jan Unkelbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/ad94c8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Liver cancer patients may benefit from proton therapy through increase of the tumor control probability (TCP). However, proton therapy is a limited resource and may not be available for all patients. We consider combined proton-photon liver SBRT treatments (CPPT) where only some fractions are delivered with protons. It is investigated how limited proton fractions can be used best for individual patients and optimally allocated within a patient group.&#xD;&#xD;Approach: Photon and proton treatment plans were created for five liver cancer patients. In CPPT, limited proton fractions may be optimally exploited by increasing the fraction dose compared to photon fraction dose. To determine a patient's optimal proton and photon fraction dose, we maximize the target BED while constraining the mean normal liver BED, which leads to an up- or downscaling of the proton and photon plan, respectively. The resulting CPPT balances the benefits of fractionation in the normal liver versus exploiting the superior proton dose distributions. After converting the target BED to TCP, the optimal number of proton fractions per patient is determined by maximizing the overall TCP of the patient group.&#xD;&#xD;Main results: For the individual patient, a CPPT treatment that delivers a higher fraction dose with protons than photons allows for dose escalation in the target compared to delivering the same proton and photon fraction dose. On the level of a patient group, CPPT may allow to distribute limited proton slots over several patients. Through an optimal use and allocation of proton fractions, CPPT may increase the average patient group TCP compared to a proton patient selection strategy where patients receive single-modality proton or photon treatments.&#xD;&#xD;Significance: Limited proton resources can be optimally exploited via CPPT by increasing the target dose in proton fractions and allocating available proton slots to patients with the highest TCP increase.&#xD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad94c8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad94c8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肝癌患者可通过提高肿瘤控制概率(TCP)从质子治疗中获益。然而,质子治疗的资源有限,并非所有患者都能接受质子治疗。我们考虑了质子-光子联合肝脏 SBRT 治疗(CPPT),在这种治疗中,只有某些部分使用质子。我们研究了如何将有限的质子部分最好地用于个别患者,以及如何在患者群体中进行最佳分配:为五名肝癌患者制定了光子和质子治疗计划。在 CPPT 中,与光子分量剂量相比,通过增加分量剂量,可以最佳利用有限的质子分量。为了确定患者的最佳质子和光子分数剂量,我们在最大化目标 BED 的同时,对平均正常肝脏 BED 进行了限制,这导致质子和光子计划分别向上或向下缩放。由此产生的 CPPT 平衡了正常肝脏分馏与利用质子剂量分布优势之间的优势。将目标 BED 转换为 TCP 后,通过最大化患者组的总体 TCP 来确定每位患者的最佳质子分段数:对单个患者而言,与提供相同的质子和光子分量剂量相比,质子分量剂量高于光子分量剂量的 CPPT 治疗可使靶区的剂量升级。就患者群体而言,CPPT 可以将有限的质子名额分配给多名患者。与质子患者选择策略(患者接受单一模式质子或光子治疗)相比,通过优化质子分数的使用和分配,CPPT 可以提高患者组的平均 TCP 值:通过 CPPT,可以提高质子分段的目标剂量,并将可用的质子时段分配给 TCP 增幅最高的患者,从而优化利用有限的质子资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal use of limited proton resources for liver cancer patients in combined proton-photon treatments.

Objective: Liver cancer patients may benefit from proton therapy through increase of the tumor control probability (TCP). However, proton therapy is a limited resource and may not be available for all patients. We consider combined proton-photon liver SBRT treatments (CPPT) where only some fractions are delivered with protons. It is investigated how limited proton fractions can be used best for individual patients and optimally allocated within a patient group. Approach: Photon and proton treatment plans were created for five liver cancer patients. In CPPT, limited proton fractions may be optimally exploited by increasing the fraction dose compared to photon fraction dose. To determine a patient's optimal proton and photon fraction dose, we maximize the target BED while constraining the mean normal liver BED, which leads to an up- or downscaling of the proton and photon plan, respectively. The resulting CPPT balances the benefits of fractionation in the normal liver versus exploiting the superior proton dose distributions. After converting the target BED to TCP, the optimal number of proton fractions per patient is determined by maximizing the overall TCP of the patient group. Main results: For the individual patient, a CPPT treatment that delivers a higher fraction dose with protons than photons allows for dose escalation in the target compared to delivering the same proton and photon fraction dose. On the level of a patient group, CPPT may allow to distribute limited proton slots over several patients. Through an optimal use and allocation of proton fractions, CPPT may increase the average patient group TCP compared to a proton patient selection strategy where patients receive single-modality proton or photon treatments. Significance: Limited proton resources can be optimally exploited via CPPT by increasing the target dose in proton fractions and allocating available proton slots to patients with the highest TCP increase. .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
期刊最新文献
Resolution-dependent MRI-to-CT translation for orthotopic breast cancer models using deep learning. Prompt gamma emission prediction using a long short-term memory network. Hybrid plug-and-play CT image restoration using nonconvex low-rank group sparsity and deep denoiser priors. A novel proposition of radiation energy conservation in radiation dose deformation using deformable image registration. An improved calibration procedure for accurate plastic scintillation dosimetry on an MR-linac.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1