中晚期早产儿的执行功能:元分析。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1542/peds.2024-067382
Lauren Rossetti, Leona Pascoe, Chandelle Piazza, Taylor Mills, Paulina Stedall, Jeanie L Y Cheong, Peter J Anderson
{"title":"中晚期早产儿的执行功能:元分析。","authors":"Lauren Rossetti, Leona Pascoe, Chandelle Piazza, Taylor Mills, Paulina Stedall, Jeanie L Y Cheong, Peter J Anderson","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-067382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><strong>Context: </strong>The risk of early neurodevelopmental delay is increasingly recognized in children born moderate-to-late preterm (MLP; 32-36 weeks' gestation), but school-aged cognitive outcomes are unclear, particularly for domains such as executive function (EF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate EF outcomes (attentional control, cognitive flexibility, and goal setting) in school-aged children born MLP compared with children born at term.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, and Scopus.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies assessing EF outcomes (overall EF, attentional control, cognitive flexibility, and goal setting) in children born MLP aged between 6 and 17 years, which included a term-born control group.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two reviewers screened for eligibility and completed the risk of bias assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and 1 reviewer extracted data. Random effects meta-analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analyses (2348 MLP children and 20 322 controls). Children born MLP had poorer overall EF compared with children born at term (standardized mean difference, -0.15, 95% confidence interval, -0.21 to -0.09; P < .0001; I2 = 47.59%). Similar conclusions were noted across the subdomains of attentional control, cognitive flexibility, and goal setting.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Study methodologies and EF measures varied. Only a small number of studies met eligibility criteria and were from developed countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>School-aged children born MLP may experience greater challenges in EF compared with term-born children. Further research is needed to investigate the potential impact these challenges have on functional outcomes such as academic achievement and social-emotional functioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Executive Function in Children Born Moderate-to-Late Preterm: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Rossetti, Leona Pascoe, Chandelle Piazza, Taylor Mills, Paulina Stedall, Jeanie L Y Cheong, Peter J Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/peds.2024-067382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p></p><p><strong>Context: </strong>The risk of early neurodevelopmental delay is increasingly recognized in children born moderate-to-late preterm (MLP; 32-36 weeks' gestation), but school-aged cognitive outcomes are unclear, particularly for domains such as executive function (EF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate EF outcomes (attentional control, cognitive flexibility, and goal setting) in school-aged children born MLP compared with children born at term.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, and Scopus.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies assessing EF outcomes (overall EF, attentional control, cognitive flexibility, and goal setting) in children born MLP aged between 6 and 17 years, which included a term-born control group.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two reviewers screened for eligibility and completed the risk of bias assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and 1 reviewer extracted data. Random effects meta-analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analyses (2348 MLP children and 20 322 controls). Children born MLP had poorer overall EF compared with children born at term (standardized mean difference, -0.15, 95% confidence interval, -0.21 to -0.09; P < .0001; I2 = 47.59%). Similar conclusions were noted across the subdomains of attentional control, cognitive flexibility, and goal setting.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Study methodologies and EF measures varied. Only a small number of studies met eligibility criteria and were from developed countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>School-aged children born MLP may experience greater challenges in EF compared with term-born children. Further research is needed to investigate the potential impact these challenges have on functional outcomes such as academic achievement and social-emotional functioning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-067382\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-067382","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:越来越多的人认识到中晚期早产儿(MLP;妊娠 32-36 周)存在早期神经发育迟缓的风险,但学龄期的认知结果尚不明确,尤其是在执行功能(EF)等领域:目的:评估早产儿与足月儿相比,学龄儿童的执行功能结果(注意力控制、认知灵活性和目标设定):数据来源:Medline、Embase、PsycInfo 和 Scopus:评估6至17岁MLP出生儿童的EF结果(整体EF、注意力控制、认知灵活性和目标设定)的研究,其中包括足月出生的对照组:两名审稿人使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表筛选合格者并完成偏倚风险评估,一名审稿人提取数据。进行了随机效应荟萃分析:12项研究符合纳入荟萃分析的条件(2348名MLP儿童和20 322名对照组儿童)。与足月出生的儿童相比,MLP出生儿童的总体EF较差(标准化平均差异为-0.15,95%置信区间为-0.21至-0.09;P < .0001;I2 = 47.59%)。在注意控制、认知灵活性和目标设定等子领域也得出了类似的结论:研究方法和 EF 测量方法各不相同。只有少数研究符合资格标准且来自发达国家:与足月出生的儿童相比,MLP 出生的学龄儿童在 EF 方面可能面临更大的挑战。需要进一步研究这些挑战对学业成绩和社会情感功能等功能结果的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Executive Function in Children Born Moderate-to-Late Preterm: A Meta-Analysis.

Context: The risk of early neurodevelopmental delay is increasingly recognized in children born moderate-to-late preterm (MLP; 32-36 weeks' gestation), but school-aged cognitive outcomes are unclear, particularly for domains such as executive function (EF).

Objective: To evaluate EF outcomes (attentional control, cognitive flexibility, and goal setting) in school-aged children born MLP compared with children born at term.

Data sources: Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, and Scopus.

Study selection: Studies assessing EF outcomes (overall EF, attentional control, cognitive flexibility, and goal setting) in children born MLP aged between 6 and 17 years, which included a term-born control group.

Data extraction: Two reviewers screened for eligibility and completed the risk of bias assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and 1 reviewer extracted data. Random effects meta-analyses were performed.

Results: Twelve studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analyses (2348 MLP children and 20 322 controls). Children born MLP had poorer overall EF compared with children born at term (standardized mean difference, -0.15, 95% confidence interval, -0.21 to -0.09; P < .0001; I2 = 47.59%). Similar conclusions were noted across the subdomains of attentional control, cognitive flexibility, and goal setting.

Limitations: Study methodologies and EF measures varied. Only a small number of studies met eligibility criteria and were from developed countries.

Conclusions: School-aged children born MLP may experience greater challenges in EF compared with term-born children. Further research is needed to investigate the potential impact these challenges have on functional outcomes such as academic achievement and social-emotional functioning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
期刊最新文献
Autism, Electrical Status Epilepticus in Sleep, and a Likely Pathogenic SEMA6B Variant. Children's Understanding of Commonly Used Medical Terminology. Disparities in Survival Without Major Morbidity Among Very Low Birth Weight Infants in California. Method for Identification and Bacterial Count Quantification in a Case of Ureaplasma Meningitis. Disordered Eating Profiles in Adolescence to Early Adulthood and Future Cardiometabolic Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1