巴西兽医对急性禽类疼痛的评估和管理的态度和意见。

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Veterinary Record Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1002/vetr.4647
André Augusto Justo, Renata Haddad Pinho, Natache Arouca Garofalo, Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade, Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna, Adriano Bonfim Carregaro, Silvia Renata Gaido Cortopassi
{"title":"巴西兽医对急性禽类疼痛的评估和管理的态度和意见。","authors":"André Augusto Justo, Renata Haddad Pinho, Natache Arouca Garofalo, Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade, Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna, Adriano Bonfim Carregaro, Silvia Renata Gaido Cortopassi","doi":"10.1002/vetr.4647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Veterinarians' approaches to the management of avian pain have been poorly documented despite the rising number of pet birds seen in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was advertised nationwide to recruit Brazilian veterinarians who had treated traumatic and surgical conditions in birds within the previous year. The survey comprised 25 closed or semi-closed questions divided into four sections (demographics, routinely performed medical procedures and pain recognition, drug choices for analgesia and challenges to pain treatment, and attitudes towards pain relief in birds). Survey results are expressed as a percentage of responses and a chi-squared test was used to compare proportions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 370 completed surveys were received. Approximately 72% of respondents worked exclusively in wild/exotic animal practice. Parrots and related species were the most commonly seen birds. The most frequently reported painful conditions were fractures (88.4%), feather plucking (73.0%) and limb amputation (65.1%). Although pain was diagnosed behaviourally by 97.6% of the respondents, 83.5% believed that the presence of an observer inhibited avian pain expression. NSAIDs and opioids, most commonly meloxicam and tramadol, were always provided perioperatively by 66.4% and 42.1% of respondents, respectively. Although nearly all respondents (95.4%) agreed that analgesics improve the quality of recovery after surgery, 80.3% stated that acute pain in birds is frequently undiagnosed in the clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Selection bias could have overestimated the attitudes concerning avian pain in relation to the wider veterinary population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Practising veterinarians in Brazil revealed a positive attitude towards avian pain management. However, the lack of validated pain assessment methods makes avian pain relief highly challenging.</p>","PeriodicalId":23560,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Record","volume":" ","pages":"e4647"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes and opinions of Brazilian veterinarians towards the assessment and management of acute avian pain.\",\"authors\":\"André Augusto Justo, Renata Haddad Pinho, Natache Arouca Garofalo, Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade, Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna, Adriano Bonfim Carregaro, Silvia Renata Gaido Cortopassi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/vetr.4647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Veterinarians' approaches to the management of avian pain have been poorly documented despite the rising number of pet birds seen in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was advertised nationwide to recruit Brazilian veterinarians who had treated traumatic and surgical conditions in birds within the previous year. The survey comprised 25 closed or semi-closed questions divided into four sections (demographics, routinely performed medical procedures and pain recognition, drug choices for analgesia and challenges to pain treatment, and attitudes towards pain relief in birds). Survey results are expressed as a percentage of responses and a chi-squared test was used to compare proportions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 370 completed surveys were received. Approximately 72% of respondents worked exclusively in wild/exotic animal practice. Parrots and related species were the most commonly seen birds. The most frequently reported painful conditions were fractures (88.4%), feather plucking (73.0%) and limb amputation (65.1%). Although pain was diagnosed behaviourally by 97.6% of the respondents, 83.5% believed that the presence of an observer inhibited avian pain expression. NSAIDs and opioids, most commonly meloxicam and tramadol, were always provided perioperatively by 66.4% and 42.1% of respondents, respectively. Although nearly all respondents (95.4%) agreed that analgesics improve the quality of recovery after surgery, 80.3% stated that acute pain in birds is frequently undiagnosed in the clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Selection bias could have overestimated the attitudes concerning avian pain in relation to the wider veterinary population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Practising veterinarians in Brazil revealed a positive attitude towards avian pain management. However, the lack of validated pain assessment methods makes avian pain relief highly challenging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Record\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e4647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.4647\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Record","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.4647","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管临床上宠物鸟的数量不断增加,但兽医处理鸟类疼痛的方法却鲜有记录:方法: 在全国范围内发布在线调查广告,招募在过去一年中治疗过鸟类创伤和手术的巴西兽医。调查包括 25 个封闭式或半封闭式问题,分为四个部分(人口统计学、常规医疗程序和疼痛识别、镇痛药物选择和疼痛治疗挑战以及对鸟类镇痛的态度)。调查结果以回复百分比表示,并使用卡方检验比较比例:结果:共收到 370 份填写完整的调查问卷。约 72% 的受访者专门从事野生/外来动物诊疗工作。鹦鹉和相关物种是最常见的鸟类。最常报告的疼痛情况是骨折(88.4%)、拔毛(73.0%)和截肢(65.1%)。虽然 97.6% 的受访者通过行为诊断出疼痛,但 83.5% 的受访者认为观察者的存在会抑制鸟类的疼痛表达。66.4%和 42.1%的受访者在围手术期总是提供非甾体抗炎药和阿片类药物,其中最常见的是美洛昔康和曲马多。尽管几乎所有受访者(95.4%)都认为镇痛药可提高术后恢复质量,但80.3%的受访者表示,鸟类的急性疼痛在临床上经常得不到诊断:选择偏差可能会高估广大兽医对禽类疼痛的态度:巴西的执业兽医对禽类疼痛治疗持积极态度。然而,由于缺乏有效的疼痛评估方法,禽类疼痛缓解工作极具挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attitudes and opinions of Brazilian veterinarians towards the assessment and management of acute avian pain.

Background: Veterinarians' approaches to the management of avian pain have been poorly documented despite the rising number of pet birds seen in clinical settings.

Methods: An online survey was advertised nationwide to recruit Brazilian veterinarians who had treated traumatic and surgical conditions in birds within the previous year. The survey comprised 25 closed or semi-closed questions divided into four sections (demographics, routinely performed medical procedures and pain recognition, drug choices for analgesia and challenges to pain treatment, and attitudes towards pain relief in birds). Survey results are expressed as a percentage of responses and a chi-squared test was used to compare proportions.

Results: A total of 370 completed surveys were received. Approximately 72% of respondents worked exclusively in wild/exotic animal practice. Parrots and related species were the most commonly seen birds. The most frequently reported painful conditions were fractures (88.4%), feather plucking (73.0%) and limb amputation (65.1%). Although pain was diagnosed behaviourally by 97.6% of the respondents, 83.5% believed that the presence of an observer inhibited avian pain expression. NSAIDs and opioids, most commonly meloxicam and tramadol, were always provided perioperatively by 66.4% and 42.1% of respondents, respectively. Although nearly all respondents (95.4%) agreed that analgesics improve the quality of recovery after surgery, 80.3% stated that acute pain in birds is frequently undiagnosed in the clinical setting.

Limitations: Selection bias could have overestimated the attitudes concerning avian pain in relation to the wider veterinary population.

Conclusion: Practising veterinarians in Brazil revealed a positive attitude towards avian pain management. However, the lack of validated pain assessment methods makes avian pain relief highly challenging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Record
Veterinary Record 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Record (branded as Vet Record) is the official journal of the British Veterinary Association (BVA) and has been published weekly since 1888. It contains news, opinion, letters, scientific reviews and original research papers and communications on a wide range of veterinary topics, along with disease surveillance reports, obituaries, careers information, business and innovation news and summaries of research papers in other journals. It is published on behalf of the BVA by BMJ Group.
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and opinions of Brazilian veterinarians towards the assessment and management of acute avian pain. Medial joint line tenderness is an indicator for meniscal injuries in dogs. Towards a microRNA-based Johne's disease diagnostic predictive system: Preliminary results. Validation of a reduction in time for avian influenza virus isolation using specific pathogen-free embryonated chicken eggs. UK animal therapists' confidence in executing professional skills in clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1