在小儿肠套叠空气灌肠术中使用氯胺酮镇静:评估安全性和腔内压力。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS Pediatrics International Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1111/ped.15835
Jun Sung Park, Dahyun Kim, Min Kyo Chun, Jeeho Han, Seung Jun Choi, Jong Seung Lee, Jeong-Min Ryu, Choong Wook Lee, Pyeong Hwa Kim, Hee Mang Yoon, Young Ah Cho, Jeong-Yong Lee
{"title":"在小儿肠套叠空气灌肠术中使用氯胺酮镇静:评估安全性和腔内压力。","authors":"Jun Sung Park, Dahyun Kim, Min Kyo Chun, Jeeho Han, Seung Jun Choi, Jong Seung Lee, Jeong-Min Ryu, Choong Wook Lee, Pyeong Hwa Kim, Hee Mang Yoon, Young Ah Cho, Jeong-Yong Lee","doi":"10.1111/ped.15835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent reports have demonstrated promising results regarding the use of ketamine sedation for reducing pediatric intussusception without an associated elevated risk of bowel perforation. However, data on direct intraluminal pressure are still lacking. This study aimed to investigate sedation safety, primarily by comparing intraluminal pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients aged 10 years or younger, diagnosed with intussusception at a university-affiliated pediatric emergency department (ED) between July 2021 and February 2023. These patients were categorized into two groups: sedation and non-sedation. During regular working hours (from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on weekdays), patients were administered 1 mg/kg of intravenous ketamine for sedation during air enema reduction. Patients within non-working hours did not receive sedative interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a study of 114 patients with intussusception (median age: 25 months), 29 (25.4%) received sedatives, and 85 (74.6%) did not. Maximum intraluminal pressure during the procedure showed no significant difference between the groups (sedation: 64 mmHg, non-sedation: 83 mmHg, p = 0.091). Bowel perforation was not observed in the overall cohort. No difference was observed in the failure rate or recurrence rate within 24 h between the two groups. Sedation with a median dose of 1 mg/kg ketamine did not cause delays in the ED process and demonstrated no adverse events while maintaining appropriate sedation depth with sequential dosing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The utilization of ketamine sedation during fluoroscopy-guided air enema reduction for pediatric intussusception was not associated with increased intraluminal pressure, increased rate of reduction failure, or bowel perforation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20039,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics International","volume":"66 1","pages":"e15835"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ketamine sedation during air enema reduction of pediatric intussusception: Assessing safety and intraluminal pressure.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Sung Park, Dahyun Kim, Min Kyo Chun, Jeeho Han, Seung Jun Choi, Jong Seung Lee, Jeong-Min Ryu, Choong Wook Lee, Pyeong Hwa Kim, Hee Mang Yoon, Young Ah Cho, Jeong-Yong Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ped.15835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent reports have demonstrated promising results regarding the use of ketamine sedation for reducing pediatric intussusception without an associated elevated risk of bowel perforation. However, data on direct intraluminal pressure are still lacking. This study aimed to investigate sedation safety, primarily by comparing intraluminal pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients aged 10 years or younger, diagnosed with intussusception at a university-affiliated pediatric emergency department (ED) between July 2021 and February 2023. These patients were categorized into two groups: sedation and non-sedation. During regular working hours (from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on weekdays), patients were administered 1 mg/kg of intravenous ketamine for sedation during air enema reduction. Patients within non-working hours did not receive sedative interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a study of 114 patients with intussusception (median age: 25 months), 29 (25.4%) received sedatives, and 85 (74.6%) did not. Maximum intraluminal pressure during the procedure showed no significant difference between the groups (sedation: 64 mmHg, non-sedation: 83 mmHg, p = 0.091). Bowel perforation was not observed in the overall cohort. No difference was observed in the failure rate or recurrence rate within 24 h between the two groups. Sedation with a median dose of 1 mg/kg ketamine did not cause delays in the ED process and demonstrated no adverse events while maintaining appropriate sedation depth with sequential dosing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The utilization of ketamine sedation during fluoroscopy-guided air enema reduction for pediatric intussusception was not associated with increased intraluminal pressure, increased rate of reduction failure, or bowel perforation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics International\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"e15835\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580367/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.15835\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.15835","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近的报告显示,使用氯胺酮镇静剂减少小儿肠套叠的效果很好,而且不会增加肠穿孔的风险。然而,有关直接腔内压力的数据仍然缺乏。本研究旨在主要通过比较腔内压力来调查镇静的安全性:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2021 年 7 月至 2023 年 2 月期间在一所大学附属儿科急诊科(ED)确诊为肠套叠的 10 岁或以下患者。这些患者被分为两组:镇静和非镇静。在正常工作时间内(工作日上午 9:00 至下午 5:00),患者静脉注射 1 毫克/千克氯胺酮,用于空气灌肠减容术的镇静。非工作时间内的患者不接受镇静干预:在对 114 名肠套叠患者(中位年龄:25 个月)进行的研究中,29 名患者(25.4%)使用了镇静剂,85 名患者(74.6%)未使用镇静剂。两组患者在手术过程中的最大腔内压力无明显差异(镇静剂:64 mmHg,非镇静剂:83 mmHg,P = 0.091)。在所有组别中均未观察到肠穿孔。两组患者在 24 小时内的失败率或复发率没有差异。中位剂量为1毫克/千克氯胺酮的镇静不会造成急诊室流程的延误,也未发现不良事件,同时通过连续给药保持了适当的镇静深度:结论:在荧光透视引导下对小儿肠套叠进行空气灌肠减压术时使用氯胺酮镇静与腔内压力升高、减压失败率升高或肠穿孔无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ketamine sedation during air enema reduction of pediatric intussusception: Assessing safety and intraluminal pressure.

Background: Recent reports have demonstrated promising results regarding the use of ketamine sedation for reducing pediatric intussusception without an associated elevated risk of bowel perforation. However, data on direct intraluminal pressure are still lacking. This study aimed to investigate sedation safety, primarily by comparing intraluminal pressure.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients aged 10 years or younger, diagnosed with intussusception at a university-affiliated pediatric emergency department (ED) between July 2021 and February 2023. These patients were categorized into two groups: sedation and non-sedation. During regular working hours (from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on weekdays), patients were administered 1 mg/kg of intravenous ketamine for sedation during air enema reduction. Patients within non-working hours did not receive sedative interventions.

Results: In a study of 114 patients with intussusception (median age: 25 months), 29 (25.4%) received sedatives, and 85 (74.6%) did not. Maximum intraluminal pressure during the procedure showed no significant difference between the groups (sedation: 64 mmHg, non-sedation: 83 mmHg, p = 0.091). Bowel perforation was not observed in the overall cohort. No difference was observed in the failure rate or recurrence rate within 24 h between the two groups. Sedation with a median dose of 1 mg/kg ketamine did not cause delays in the ED process and demonstrated no adverse events while maintaining appropriate sedation depth with sequential dosing.

Conclusions: The utilization of ketamine sedation during fluoroscopy-guided air enema reduction for pediatric intussusception was not associated with increased intraluminal pressure, increased rate of reduction failure, or bowel perforation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatrics International
Pediatrics International 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
519
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Publishing articles of scientific excellence in pediatrics and child health delivery, Pediatrics International aims to encourage those involved in the research, practice and delivery of child health to share their experiences, ideas and achievements. Formerly Acta Paediatrica Japonica, the change in name in 1999 to Pediatrics International, reflects the Journal''s international status both in readership and contributions (approximately 45% of articles published are from non-Japanese authors). The Editors continue their strong commitment to the sharing of scientific information for the benefit of children everywhere. Pediatrics International opens the door to all authors throughout the world. Manuscripts are judged by two experts solely upon the basis of their contribution of original data, original ideas and their presentation.
期刊最新文献
Prognostic factors for wellbeing in patients with hyaline fibromatosis syndrome Early diagnosis of congenital central hypoventilation syndrome Oxygenation saturation index in neonatal hypoxemic respiratory failure Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection rate among pediatric patients with respiratory symptoms Compartment syndrome due to group A streptococcal infection associated with intramuscular venous malformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1