提高鼻腔自然杀伤细胞/T 细胞淋巴瘤早期检测率和活检阳性率的方法。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Laryngoscope Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1002/lary.31914
Yi Dong, Bing Zhou, Shunjiu Cui, Qian Huang, Yan Sun, Yunfu Liu, Xiaojin He, Huijun Han
{"title":"提高鼻腔自然杀伤细胞/T 细胞淋巴瘤早期检测率和活检阳性率的方法。","authors":"Yi Dong, Bing Zhou, Shunjiu Cui, Qian Huang, Yan Sun, Yunfu Liu, Xiaojin He, Huijun Han","doi":"10.1002/lary.31914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop methods for early detection of natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (nasal NKTL) and to evaluate the use of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for selecting biopsy sites to enhance the positive biopsy rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 32 cases of nasal NKTL were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Cases were graded from 1 to 5 based on endoscopic and imaging findings. Biopsy methods included the superficial forceps method and deep incisional method. Data recorded included biopsy method, time to confirmed diagnosis, number of biopsies required, and ADC values of biopsy sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both endoscopic and MRI lesion severity did not affect biopsy outcomes (p = 0.8248, 0.7571). The deep incisional biopsy method had a significantly higher probability of yielding positive pathological results compared to the superficial clamping method [OR (95% CI) = 23.2143 (6.0448, 89.1513) (χ<sup>2</sup> = 26.1089, p < 0.0001)]. The ADC value at the site with a positive biopsy result is significantly lower than at the site with a negative result (p = 0.0003). The diagnostic threshold for ADC value to predict a positive biopsy result was 0.603 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, with a Youden index of 0.43.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nasal NKTL has distinct characteristics distinguishing it from sinusitis and other tumors. Deep incision biopsy under general anesthesia is superior to the superficial method. The location of the positive sampling site can be guided by measuring the ADC value, and the optimal diagnostic threshold of this proposed method is 0.603 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>4 Laryngoscope, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to Increase Early Detection and Positive Biopsy Rate of Nasal Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma.\",\"authors\":\"Yi Dong, Bing Zhou, Shunjiu Cui, Qian Huang, Yan Sun, Yunfu Liu, Xiaojin He, Huijun Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lary.31914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop methods for early detection of natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (nasal NKTL) and to evaluate the use of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for selecting biopsy sites to enhance the positive biopsy rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 32 cases of nasal NKTL were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Cases were graded from 1 to 5 based on endoscopic and imaging findings. Biopsy methods included the superficial forceps method and deep incisional method. Data recorded included biopsy method, time to confirmed diagnosis, number of biopsies required, and ADC values of biopsy sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both endoscopic and MRI lesion severity did not affect biopsy outcomes (p = 0.8248, 0.7571). The deep incisional biopsy method had a significantly higher probability of yielding positive pathological results compared to the superficial clamping method [OR (95% CI) = 23.2143 (6.0448, 89.1513) (χ<sup>2</sup> = 26.1089, p < 0.0001)]. The ADC value at the site with a positive biopsy result is significantly lower than at the site with a negative result (p = 0.0003). The diagnostic threshold for ADC value to predict a positive biopsy result was 0.603 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, with a Youden index of 0.43.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nasal NKTL has distinct characteristics distinguishing it from sinusitis and other tumors. Deep incision biopsy under general anesthesia is superior to the superficial method. The location of the positive sampling site can be guided by measuring the ADC value, and the optimal diagnostic threshold of this proposed method is 0.603 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>4 Laryngoscope, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31914\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31914","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的开发早期检测鼻腔型自然杀伤/T细胞淋巴瘤(鼻NKTL)的方法,并评估利用弥散加权成像(DWI)的表观弥散系数(ADC)测量值选择活检部位以提高活检阳性率:方法:回顾性收集并分析了 32 例鼻腔 NKTL 的临床数据。根据内窥镜和影像学检查结果将病例分为 1 至 5 级。活检方法包括表层镊子法和深部切开法。记录的数据包括活检方法、确诊时间、所需活检次数以及活检部位的 ADC 值:结果:内窥镜和磁共振成像的病变严重程度均不影响活检结果(P = 0.8248,0.7571)。与浅层钳夹法相比,深部切开活检法获得阳性病理结果的概率明显更高[OR (95% CI) = 23.2143 (6.0448, 89.1513) (χ2 = 26.1089, p -3 mm2/s,Youden指数为0.43]:鼻腔 NKTL 具有区别于鼻窦炎和其他肿瘤的独特特征。在全身麻醉下进行深部切口活检优于浅表方法。通过测量 ADC 值可确定阳性取样部位的位置,该方法的最佳诊断阈值为 0.603 × 10-3 mm2/s:4 《喉镜》,2024 年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Approaches to Increase Early Detection and Positive Biopsy Rate of Nasal Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma.

Objectives: To develop methods for early detection of natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (nasal NKTL) and to evaluate the use of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for selecting biopsy sites to enhance the positive biopsy rate.

Methods: The clinical data of 32 cases of nasal NKTL were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Cases were graded from 1 to 5 based on endoscopic and imaging findings. Biopsy methods included the superficial forceps method and deep incisional method. Data recorded included biopsy method, time to confirmed diagnosis, number of biopsies required, and ADC values of biopsy sites.

Results: Both endoscopic and MRI lesion severity did not affect biopsy outcomes (p = 0.8248, 0.7571). The deep incisional biopsy method had a significantly higher probability of yielding positive pathological results compared to the superficial clamping method [OR (95% CI) = 23.2143 (6.0448, 89.1513) (χ2 = 26.1089, p < 0.0001)]. The ADC value at the site with a positive biopsy result is significantly lower than at the site with a negative result (p = 0.0003). The diagnostic threshold for ADC value to predict a positive biopsy result was 0.603 × 10-3 mm2/s, with a Youden index of 0.43.

Conclusions: Nasal NKTL has distinct characteristics distinguishing it from sinusitis and other tumors. Deep incision biopsy under general anesthesia is superior to the superficial method. The location of the positive sampling site can be guided by measuring the ADC value, and the optimal diagnostic threshold of this proposed method is 0.603 × 10-3 mm2/s.

Level of evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
500
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope. • Broncho-esophagology • Communicative disorders • Head and neck surgery • Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery • Oncology • Speech and hearing defects
期刊最新文献
Approaches to Increase Early Detection and Positive Biopsy Rate of Nasal Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma. Middle Ear microRNAs Drive Mucin Gene Response. Should Cochlear Implant Contraindicate Transcranial Stimulation? A Case Study with Safety Implications. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Repair of Nasal Septal Perforation: A Two-Center Retrospective Study. Laryngeal Mucosal Tumor Mapping with Narrow Band Imaging and Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1