{"title":"MFRP、PRSS56 和 MYRF 在中国纳米眼病患者中占 60.5%。","authors":"Jing Tao, Zi-Bing Jin, Ren-Juan Shen","doi":"10.1111/ceo.14465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to present the genetic profile of a rare ocular disease nanophthalmos (NO) in a large Chinese cohort, to explore its genetic characteristics and genotype-phenotype correlations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 43 unrelated pedigrees diagnosed with NO were recruited. Whole exome sequencing and copy number variation analysis were performed, followed by validation and pathogenicity classification of the detected variants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall genetic diagnostic rate was 60.5%. Twenty-eight unique genetic variants of MFRP, PRSS56, and MYRF have been identified, of which 19 were reported for the first time. The c.1486G>A variant in MFRP and the c.1066dupC variant in PRSS56 were the two most frequent variants. Patients with variants in MFRP or PRSS56 tended to possess shorter axial lengths than those with MYRF variants. Among patients with MFRP null variants, a higher proportion developed uveal effusion syndrome (UES) than did those without null variants, whereas among patients with PRSS56 null variants, a greater number of patients developed angle-closure glaucoma (ACG). A higher proportion of MFRP-related NO patients developed both UES and ACG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MFRP, PRSS56, and MYRF account for the majority of genetic causes of NO. MFRP-related NO patients tend to exhibit a strong predisposition to complications. Null variants in MFRP and PRSS56 may increase susceptibility to clinical complications. This study provides insights into the genetic landscape and clinical characteristics of NO. These findings will lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying nanophthalmos and other diseases associated with eye development.</p>","PeriodicalId":55253,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MFRP, PRSS56, and MYRF account for 60.5% of a Chinese cohort with nanophthalmos.\",\"authors\":\"Jing Tao, Zi-Bing Jin, Ren-Juan Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ceo.14465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to present the genetic profile of a rare ocular disease nanophthalmos (NO) in a large Chinese cohort, to explore its genetic characteristics and genotype-phenotype correlations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 43 unrelated pedigrees diagnosed with NO were recruited. Whole exome sequencing and copy number variation analysis were performed, followed by validation and pathogenicity classification of the detected variants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall genetic diagnostic rate was 60.5%. Twenty-eight unique genetic variants of MFRP, PRSS56, and MYRF have been identified, of which 19 were reported for the first time. The c.1486G>A variant in MFRP and the c.1066dupC variant in PRSS56 were the two most frequent variants. Patients with variants in MFRP or PRSS56 tended to possess shorter axial lengths than those with MYRF variants. Among patients with MFRP null variants, a higher proportion developed uveal effusion syndrome (UES) than did those without null variants, whereas among patients with PRSS56 null variants, a greater number of patients developed angle-closure glaucoma (ACG). A higher proportion of MFRP-related NO patients developed both UES and ACG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MFRP, PRSS56, and MYRF account for the majority of genetic causes of NO. MFRP-related NO patients tend to exhibit a strong predisposition to complications. Null variants in MFRP and PRSS56 may increase susceptibility to clinical complications. This study provides insights into the genetic landscape and clinical characteristics of NO. These findings will lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying nanophthalmos and other diseases associated with eye development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14465\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14465","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究旨在展示一种罕见眼病纳米眼(NO)在中国大样本人群中的遗传特征,探讨其遗传特征和基因表型相关性:本研究的目的是在一个庞大的中国队列中展示一种罕见眼病纳米眼(NO)的遗传特征,探讨其遗传特性以及基因型与表型之间的相关性:方法:共收集了43个确诊为纳米眼病的非亲缘血统。方法:共收集了 43 个确诊为 NO 的非亲缘血统样本,进行了全外显子组测序和拷贝数变异分析,并对检测到的变异进行了验证和致病性分类:结果:总体基因诊断率为 60.5%。结果:总体基因诊断率为 60.5%,发现了 28 个独特的 MFRP、PRSS56 和 MYRF 基因变异,其中 19 个为首次报道。MFRP 中的 c.1486G>A 变异和 PRSS56 中的 c.1066dupC 变异是最常见的两种变异。MFRP或PRSS56变异的患者往往比MYRF变异的患者拥有更短的轴长。在 MFRP 空变异的患者中,发生葡萄膜渗出综合征(UES)的比例高于无空变异的患者,而在 PRSS56 空变异的患者中,发生闭角型青光眼(ACG)的人数较多。MFRP相关NO患者中同时患上UES和ACG的比例较高:结论:MFRP、PRSS56 和 MYRF 占 NO 遗传病因的大多数。结论:MFRP、PRSS56 和 MYRF 占 NO 遗传病因的大多数。MFRP和PRSS56的无效变异可能会增加临床并发症的易感性。这项研究为了解 NO 的遗传情况和临床特征提供了深入的见解。这些发现将有助于更好地了解纳米眼和其他与眼发育相关的疾病的发病机制。
MFRP, PRSS56, and MYRF account for 60.5% of a Chinese cohort with nanophthalmos.
Background: This study aimed to present the genetic profile of a rare ocular disease nanophthalmos (NO) in a large Chinese cohort, to explore its genetic characteristics and genotype-phenotype correlations.
Methods: A total of 43 unrelated pedigrees diagnosed with NO were recruited. Whole exome sequencing and copy number variation analysis were performed, followed by validation and pathogenicity classification of the detected variants.
Results: The overall genetic diagnostic rate was 60.5%. Twenty-eight unique genetic variants of MFRP, PRSS56, and MYRF have been identified, of which 19 were reported for the first time. The c.1486G>A variant in MFRP and the c.1066dupC variant in PRSS56 were the two most frequent variants. Patients with variants in MFRP or PRSS56 tended to possess shorter axial lengths than those with MYRF variants. Among patients with MFRP null variants, a higher proportion developed uveal effusion syndrome (UES) than did those without null variants, whereas among patients with PRSS56 null variants, a greater number of patients developed angle-closure glaucoma (ACG). A higher proportion of MFRP-related NO patients developed both UES and ACG.
Conclusions: MFRP, PRSS56, and MYRF account for the majority of genetic causes of NO. MFRP-related NO patients tend to exhibit a strong predisposition to complications. Null variants in MFRP and PRSS56 may increase susceptibility to clinical complications. This study provides insights into the genetic landscape and clinical characteristics of NO. These findings will lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying nanophthalmos and other diseases associated with eye development.
期刊介绍:
Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research and reviews dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research which are international in scope and application. CEO recognises the importance of collaborative research and welcomes papers that have a direct influence on ophthalmic practice but are not unique to ophthalmology.