男男性行为者接受药物辅助治疗可卡因使用障碍的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1186/s13722-024-00515-0
Elaine Hsiang, Kishan Patel, Erin C Wilson, Alexandrea Dunham, Janet Ikeda, Tim Matheson, Glenn-Milo Santos
{"title":"男男性行为者接受药物辅助治疗可卡因使用障碍的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。","authors":"Elaine Hsiang, Kishan Patel, Erin C Wilson, Alexandrea Dunham, Janet Ikeda, Tim Matheson, Glenn-Milo Santos","doi":"10.1186/s13722-024-00515-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rates of cocaine use disorder (CUD) among men who have sex with men (MSM) are high and rising. Among MSM, cocaine use is associated with negative socioeconomic, medical, and psychological outcomes. There are no FDA-approved pharmacotherapy options to treat CUD, and psychosocial interventions demonstrate limited efficacy. While there have been numerous trials evaluating possible medications for CUD, there is a scarcity of qualitative data on the barriers and facilitators of medication-assisted treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 participants enrolled in a phase II randomized control trial evaluating extended-release lorcaserin among MSM with CUD. Participants were asked about their motivations for enrolling in the study, attitudes towards taking a medication for CUD, barriers and facilitators of study pill adherence, and their general study experience. Interviews were analyzed using an inductive and exploratory approach to thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were highly motivated to reduce cocaine use and viewed pharmacotherapy as a viable and desirable treatment option. Pharmacotherapy was seen as having fewer access and adherence structural barriers compared to existing psychosocial therapies. Medication reminders facilitated pill taking, while side effects, travel, and active substance use presented barriers to study pill adherence. Disclosure of study participation within social networks was variable pointing to anticipated substance use and treatment stigma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights important factors affecting the acceptability and uptake of medication-assisted treatment for CUD among a diverse sample of MSM. These findings can help guide the development and implementation of future pharmacotherapy options for CUD and other substance use disorders in this key population.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators to medication-assisted treatment for cocaine use disorder among men who have sex with men: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Elaine Hsiang, Kishan Patel, Erin C Wilson, Alexandrea Dunham, Janet Ikeda, Tim Matheson, Glenn-Milo Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13722-024-00515-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rates of cocaine use disorder (CUD) among men who have sex with men (MSM) are high and rising. Among MSM, cocaine use is associated with negative socioeconomic, medical, and psychological outcomes. There are no FDA-approved pharmacotherapy options to treat CUD, and psychosocial interventions demonstrate limited efficacy. While there have been numerous trials evaluating possible medications for CUD, there is a scarcity of qualitative data on the barriers and facilitators of medication-assisted treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 participants enrolled in a phase II randomized control trial evaluating extended-release lorcaserin among MSM with CUD. Participants were asked about their motivations for enrolling in the study, attitudes towards taking a medication for CUD, barriers and facilitators of study pill adherence, and their general study experience. Interviews were analyzed using an inductive and exploratory approach to thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were highly motivated to reduce cocaine use and viewed pharmacotherapy as a viable and desirable treatment option. Pharmacotherapy was seen as having fewer access and adherence structural barriers compared to existing psychosocial therapies. Medication reminders facilitated pill taking, while side effects, travel, and active substance use presented barriers to study pill adherence. Disclosure of study participation within social networks was variable pointing to anticipated substance use and treatment stigma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights important factors affecting the acceptability and uptake of medication-assisted treatment for CUD among a diverse sample of MSM. These findings can help guide the development and implementation of future pharmacotherapy options for CUD and other substance use disorders in this key population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577920/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-024-00515-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-024-00515-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在男男性行为者(MSM)中,可卡因使用障碍(CUD)的发病率很高,而且还在不断上升。在男男性行为者中,可卡因的使用与不良的社会经济、医疗和心理后果有关。目前尚无美国食品及药物管理局批准的药物疗法可用于治疗 CUD,社会心理干预的疗效也很有限。虽然有许多试验对治疗 CUD 的药物进行了评估,但有关药物辅助治疗的障碍和促进因素的定性数据却十分稀少:我们对 16 名参加第二阶段随机对照试验的参与者进行了半结构化访谈,该试验对患有 CUD 的 MSM 进行了缓释氯卡色林评估。研究人员询问了参与者参加研究的动机、对服用治疗 CUD 药物的态度、坚持服用研究药物的障碍和促进因素,以及他们的一般研究经历。采用归纳和探索性主题分析方法对访谈进行了分析:结果:参与者减少使用可卡因的积极性很高,并认为药物疗法是一种可行且可取的治疗方案。与现有的社会心理疗法相比,他们认为药物疗法在获取和坚持方面存在较少的结构性障碍。用药提醒有助于患者服药,而副作用、旅行和药物使用则是影响患者坚持服药的障碍。在社交网络中披露参与研究的情况也不尽相同,这表明预期的药物使用和治疗耻辱感:我们的研究强调了在不同的 MSM 样本中影响药物辅助治疗 CUD 的可接受性和接受度的重要因素。这些发现有助于指导未来针对这一重要人群的 CUD 和其他药物使用障碍的药物治疗方案的开发和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers and facilitators to medication-assisted treatment for cocaine use disorder among men who have sex with men: a qualitative study.

Background: Rates of cocaine use disorder (CUD) among men who have sex with men (MSM) are high and rising. Among MSM, cocaine use is associated with negative socioeconomic, medical, and psychological outcomes. There are no FDA-approved pharmacotherapy options to treat CUD, and psychosocial interventions demonstrate limited efficacy. While there have been numerous trials evaluating possible medications for CUD, there is a scarcity of qualitative data on the barriers and facilitators of medication-assisted treatment.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 participants enrolled in a phase II randomized control trial evaluating extended-release lorcaserin among MSM with CUD. Participants were asked about their motivations for enrolling in the study, attitudes towards taking a medication for CUD, barriers and facilitators of study pill adherence, and their general study experience. Interviews were analyzed using an inductive and exploratory approach to thematic analysis.

Results: Participants were highly motivated to reduce cocaine use and viewed pharmacotherapy as a viable and desirable treatment option. Pharmacotherapy was seen as having fewer access and adherence structural barriers compared to existing psychosocial therapies. Medication reminders facilitated pill taking, while side effects, travel, and active substance use presented barriers to study pill adherence. Disclosure of study participation within social networks was variable pointing to anticipated substance use and treatment stigma.

Conclusions: Our study highlights important factors affecting the acceptability and uptake of medication-assisted treatment for CUD among a diverse sample of MSM. These findings can help guide the development and implementation of future pharmacotherapy options for CUD and other substance use disorders in this key population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations. Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
期刊最新文献
Survey of Massachusetts peer recovery coaches' attitudes toward the use of psychedelics to treat substance use disorders. Strategies for improving treatment retention for buprenorphine/naloxone for opioid use disorder: a qualitative study of issues and recommendations from prescribers. Barriers and facilitators to medication-assisted treatment for cocaine use disorder among men who have sex with men: a qualitative study. CTN-0138: adaptation, implementation, and cluster randomized trial of a Community Pharmacy-Based Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Opioid Risk Assessment Tool-a protocol paper. Feasibility and acceptability of a web-intervention to prevent alcohol and cannabis-impaired driving among adolescents in driver education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1