为静脉体外膜氧患者进行 "清醒 "插管:体外生命支持组织登记分析。

Q4 Medicine Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001181
Amira Mohamed, Omar Saeed, Melissa Fazzari, Michelle Gong, Mayuko Uehara, Stephen Forest, Anthony Carlese, Marjan Rahmanian, Sammar Alsunaid, Ali Mansour, Matthew Levitus, Deborah Orsi, David Furfaro, Annette Ilg, Anthony Manasia, Ari Moskowitz
{"title":"为静脉体外膜氧患者进行 \"清醒 \"插管:体外生命支持组织登记分析。","authors":"Amira Mohamed, Omar Saeed, Melissa Fazzari, Michelle Gong, Mayuko Uehara, Stephen Forest, Anthony Carlese, Marjan Rahmanian, Sammar Alsunaid, Ali Mansour, Matthew Levitus, Deborah Orsi, David Furfaro, Annette Ilg, Anthony Manasia, Ari Moskowitz","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>\"Awake\" cannulation for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), where patients remain spontaneously breathing without invasive mechanical ventilation during the cannulation procedure, may reduce lung injury from positive pressure ventilation and promote patient mobility.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the association between \"awake\" cannulation for venovenous ECMO and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Analysis of the prospectively collected by the multicenter Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Patients 18 years old or older who were cannulated for venovenous ECMO between 2016 and 2022 were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Propensity score matching techniques were used to examine the association between the primary exposure of \"awake\" cannulation and the primary outcome of hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study analyzed data from 28,627 patients who received venovenous ECMO, including 797 (2.8%) who underwent awake cannulation. Patients undergoing awake cannulation were older (52.2 vs. 47.8 yr), had greater prevalence of chronic lung diseases (50.6% vs. 48.9%), and ischemic heart disease (4.3% vs. 2.7%) compared with those cannulated while receiving mechanical ventilation. Hospital survival to discharge was did not differ significantly between awake and nonawake cannulation groups after propensity score matching (2.4% increased rate of survival for patients cannulated awake; 95% CI, -1.7% to 6.4%; p = 0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this large, multicenter study, awake cannulation for venovenous ECMO was uncommon but increasingly used over time. Survival to hospital discharge was similar to patients cannulated while on mechanical ventilation. Future research should focus on identification of patient cohorts most likely to benefit from \"\"awake\" cannulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"6 12","pages":"e1181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Awake\\\" Cannulation of Patients for Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygen: An Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Amira Mohamed, Omar Saeed, Melissa Fazzari, Michelle Gong, Mayuko Uehara, Stephen Forest, Anthony Carlese, Marjan Rahmanian, Sammar Alsunaid, Ali Mansour, Matthew Levitus, Deborah Orsi, David Furfaro, Annette Ilg, Anthony Manasia, Ari Moskowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>\\\"Awake\\\" cannulation for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), where patients remain spontaneously breathing without invasive mechanical ventilation during the cannulation procedure, may reduce lung injury from positive pressure ventilation and promote patient mobility.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the association between \\\"awake\\\" cannulation for venovenous ECMO and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Analysis of the prospectively collected by the multicenter Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Patients 18 years old or older who were cannulated for venovenous ECMO between 2016 and 2022 were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Propensity score matching techniques were used to examine the association between the primary exposure of \\\"awake\\\" cannulation and the primary outcome of hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study analyzed data from 28,627 patients who received venovenous ECMO, including 797 (2.8%) who underwent awake cannulation. Patients undergoing awake cannulation were older (52.2 vs. 47.8 yr), had greater prevalence of chronic lung diseases (50.6% vs. 48.9%), and ischemic heart disease (4.3% vs. 2.7%) compared with those cannulated while receiving mechanical ventilation. Hospital survival to discharge was did not differ significantly between awake and nonawake cannulation groups after propensity score matching (2.4% increased rate of survival for patients cannulated awake; 95% CI, -1.7% to 6.4%; p = 0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this large, multicenter study, awake cannulation for venovenous ECMO was uncommon but increasingly used over time. Survival to hospital discharge was similar to patients cannulated while on mechanical ventilation. Future research should focus on identification of patient cohorts most likely to benefit from \\\"\\\"awake\\\" cannulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"6 12\",\"pages\":\"e1181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584221/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:静脉体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)的 "清醒 "插管,即在插管过程中患者保持自主呼吸而不进行侵入性机械通气,可减少正压通气对肺部的损伤并促进患者的活动能力:研究静脉 ECMO "清醒 "插管与患者预后之间的关系:对多中心体外生命支持组织登记处收集的前瞻性资料进行分析。纳入2016年至2022年期间插管进行静脉ECMO的18岁或18岁以上患者:采用倾向得分匹配技术研究 "清醒 "插管的主要暴露与住院死亡率这一主要结果之间的关联:该研究分析了28627名接受静脉ECMO患者的数据,其中797人(2.8%)接受了清醒插管。与接受机械通气时插管的患者相比,接受清醒插管的患者年龄更大(52.2 岁对 47.8 岁),慢性肺部疾病(50.6% 对 48.9%)和缺血性心脏病(4.3% 对 2.7%)的发病率更高。经过倾向评分匹配后,清醒插管组和非清醒插管组的出院存活率没有显著差异(清醒插管患者的存活率增加 2.4%;95% CI,-1.7% 至 6.4%;P = 0.26):在这项大型多中心研究中,静脉 ECMO 的清醒插管并不常见,但随着时间的推移,使用率越来越高。出院后的存活率与机械通气时插管的患者相似。未来的研究应侧重于确定最有可能从 "清醒 "插管中获益的患者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Awake" Cannulation of Patients for Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygen: An Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry.

Importance: "Awake" cannulation for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), where patients remain spontaneously breathing without invasive mechanical ventilation during the cannulation procedure, may reduce lung injury from positive pressure ventilation and promote patient mobility.

Objectives: To examine the association between "awake" cannulation for venovenous ECMO and patient outcomes.

Design, setting, and participants: Analysis of the prospectively collected by the multicenter Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Patients 18 years old or older who were cannulated for venovenous ECMO between 2016 and 2022 were included.

Main outcomes and measures: Propensity score matching techniques were used to examine the association between the primary exposure of "awake" cannulation and the primary outcome of hospital mortality.

Results: This study analyzed data from 28,627 patients who received venovenous ECMO, including 797 (2.8%) who underwent awake cannulation. Patients undergoing awake cannulation were older (52.2 vs. 47.8 yr), had greater prevalence of chronic lung diseases (50.6% vs. 48.9%), and ischemic heart disease (4.3% vs. 2.7%) compared with those cannulated while receiving mechanical ventilation. Hospital survival to discharge was did not differ significantly between awake and nonawake cannulation groups after propensity score matching (2.4% increased rate of survival for patients cannulated awake; 95% CI, -1.7% to 6.4%; p = 0.26).

Conclusions and relevance: In this large, multicenter study, awake cannulation for venovenous ECMO was uncommon but increasingly used over time. Survival to hospital discharge was similar to patients cannulated while on mechanical ventilation. Future research should focus on identification of patient cohorts most likely to benefit from ""awake" cannulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Awake" Cannulation of Patients for Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygen: An Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. Current Emergency Medical Service Vasoactive Use for the Management of Shock. Critical Data for Critical Care: A Primer on Leveraging Electronic Health Record Data for Research From Society of Critical Care Medicine's Panel on Data Sharing and Harmonization. Clinical Subtype Trajectories in Sepsis Patients Admitted to the ICU: A Secondary Analysis of an Observational Study. Septic Shock Requiring Three Vasopressors: Patient Demographics and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1