生态系统多久会受到自上而下的控制?草原、蚱蜢和鸟类系统的时空实验

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecosphere Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70066
Gary E. Belovsky, Jennifer B. Slade
{"title":"生态系统多久会受到自上而下的控制?草原、蚱蜢和鸟类系统的时空实验","authors":"Gary E. Belovsky,&nbsp;Jennifer B. Slade","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ecosystems are frequently considered to be controlled by predation (top-down). Experiments examined this in four bird/spider/grasshopper/prairie habitats over 34 years, employing in each habitat three 100 m<sup>2</sup> bird exclosures and controls (121 habitat/year cases) where plant, grasshopper, and spider abundances were measured. Top-down control (plants decrease and grasshoppers increase with bird exclusion) was observed in only 13.2% of cases, while plants increased and grasshoppers decreased in 33.1% of cases, plants decreased and grasshoppers decreased in 25.6% of cases, and plants increased and grasshoppers increased in 28.1% of cases. Therefore, top-down control was not common and system responses were not constant, but varied among sites, years, and directionally over time with climate change. This diversity of responses is expected given the variety of underlying processes in complex ecosystems. For example, decision tree/discriminant analysis found that plant decreases and increases with bird exclusion were correctly identified in 78.3% of cases by grasshopper hatchling abundance, plant cover, and annual net primary production (ANPP), while grasshopper decreases and increases with bird exclusion were correctly identified in 76.7% of cases by edible plant biomass per grasshopper hatchling, grasshopper hatchling abundance, and large grasshopper abundance. Analysis of other system-wide terrestrial trophic experiments indicates that the variety of responses observed by us over time and space may be common so that system-wide trophic responses may, in general, be more variable than either top-down or bottom-up as often considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How often are ecosystems top-down controlled? Experiments in grassland, grasshopper, and bird systems over time and space\",\"authors\":\"Gary E. Belovsky,&nbsp;Jennifer B. Slade\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecs2.70066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Ecosystems are frequently considered to be controlled by predation (top-down). Experiments examined this in four bird/spider/grasshopper/prairie habitats over 34 years, employing in each habitat three 100 m<sup>2</sup> bird exclosures and controls (121 habitat/year cases) where plant, grasshopper, and spider abundances were measured. Top-down control (plants decrease and grasshoppers increase with bird exclusion) was observed in only 13.2% of cases, while plants increased and grasshoppers decreased in 33.1% of cases, plants decreased and grasshoppers decreased in 25.6% of cases, and plants increased and grasshoppers increased in 28.1% of cases. Therefore, top-down control was not common and system responses were not constant, but varied among sites, years, and directionally over time with climate change. This diversity of responses is expected given the variety of underlying processes in complex ecosystems. For example, decision tree/discriminant analysis found that plant decreases and increases with bird exclusion were correctly identified in 78.3% of cases by grasshopper hatchling abundance, plant cover, and annual net primary production (ANPP), while grasshopper decreases and increases with bird exclusion were correctly identified in 76.7% of cases by edible plant biomass per grasshopper hatchling, grasshopper hatchling abundance, and large grasshopper abundance. Analysis of other system-wide terrestrial trophic experiments indicates that the variety of responses observed by us over time and space may be common so that system-wide trophic responses may, in general, be more variable than either top-down or bottom-up as often considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosphere\",\"volume\":\"15 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70066\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70066\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态系统经常被认为是由捕食(自上而下)控制的。实验在鸟类/蜘蛛/蚱蜢/草原四个栖息地进行了长达 34 年的研究,在每个栖息地采用了三个 100 平方米的鸟类隔离区和对照组(每年 121 个栖息地),测量植物、蚱蜢和蜘蛛的数量。仅在 13.2% 的情况下观察到了自上而下的控制(鸟类隔离后植物减少、蚱蜢增加),而在 33.1% 的情况下植物增加、蚱蜢减少,在 25.6% 的情况下植物减少、蚱蜢减少,在 28.1% 的情况下植物增加、蚱蜢增加。因此,自上而下的控制并不常见,系统的反应也不是一成不变的,而是随地点、年份和气候变化的时间方向而变化。鉴于复杂生态系统的基本过程多种多样,这种反应的多样性是意料之中的。例如,决策树/判别分析发现,通过蚱蜢幼体丰度、植物覆盖率和年净初级生产量(ANPP),78.3%的情况下能正确识别出鸟类排斥导致的植物减少和增加,而通过每只蚱蜢幼体可食用植物生物量、蚱蜢幼体丰度和大型蚱蜢丰度,76.7%的情况下能正确识别出鸟类排斥导致的蚱蜢减少和增加。对其他全系统陆地营养实验的分析表明,我们在时间和空间上观察到的各种反应可能是共同的,因此全系统营养反应一般可能比通常认为的自上而下或自下而上的反应更加多变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How often are ecosystems top-down controlled? Experiments in grassland, grasshopper, and bird systems over time and space

Ecosystems are frequently considered to be controlled by predation (top-down). Experiments examined this in four bird/spider/grasshopper/prairie habitats over 34 years, employing in each habitat three 100 m2 bird exclosures and controls (121 habitat/year cases) where plant, grasshopper, and spider abundances were measured. Top-down control (plants decrease and grasshoppers increase with bird exclusion) was observed in only 13.2% of cases, while plants increased and grasshoppers decreased in 33.1% of cases, plants decreased and grasshoppers decreased in 25.6% of cases, and plants increased and grasshoppers increased in 28.1% of cases. Therefore, top-down control was not common and system responses were not constant, but varied among sites, years, and directionally over time with climate change. This diversity of responses is expected given the variety of underlying processes in complex ecosystems. For example, decision tree/discriminant analysis found that plant decreases and increases with bird exclusion were correctly identified in 78.3% of cases by grasshopper hatchling abundance, plant cover, and annual net primary production (ANPP), while grasshopper decreases and increases with bird exclusion were correctly identified in 76.7% of cases by edible plant biomass per grasshopper hatchling, grasshopper hatchling abundance, and large grasshopper abundance. Analysis of other system-wide terrestrial trophic experiments indicates that the variety of responses observed by us over time and space may be common so that system-wide trophic responses may, in general, be more variable than either top-down or bottom-up as often considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
期刊最新文献
Leveraging traits for insight into the fungal ecology of burned ecosystems Video of rusty-spotted genets consuming bats and other prey: Behaviors observed and eco-epidemiological considerations The effects of spatiotemporal variation in marine resources on the occupancy dynamics of a terrestrial avian predator How often are ecosystems top-down controlled? Experiments in grassland, grasshopper, and bird systems over time and space Agricultural mosaics offer nesting habitat to dabbling ducks in the arid Intermountain West of the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1