比较三种先进的 hybryd 闭环系统在实现 1 型糖尿病成人患者血糖目标方面的夜间疗效。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Acta Diabetologica Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1007/s00592-024-02397-9
Nicolò Diego Borella, Antonio Ferramosca, Giona Castagna, Silvia Ippolito, Sara Ceresoli, Antonio Taverna, Beatrice Sonzogni, Roberto Trevisan, Giuseppe Lepore
{"title":"比较三种先进的 hybryd 闭环系统在实现 1 型糖尿病成人患者血糖目标方面的夜间疗效。","authors":"Nicolò Diego Borella, Antonio Ferramosca, Giona Castagna, Silvia Ippolito, Sara Ceresoli, Antonio Taverna, Beatrice Sonzogni, Roberto Trevisan, Giuseppe Lepore","doi":"10.1007/s00592-024-02397-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) systems currently represent the most advanced modality of insulin therapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the night-time (from 00 to 07 a.m.) effectiveness in achieving recommended glycemic targets of three different AHCL systems in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated 55 adults with T1D (mean age 41 ± 16 years, male 40%, diabetes duration 19.4 ± 11.4 years, BMI 24.1 ± 4.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) with similar glycemic control (GMI 7.0-7.4%). Twenty-two participants were using the Minimed 780G system, 18 the Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ system and 15 the DBLG1 system. Continuous glucose monitoring derived metrics and insulin requirement of 14 consecutive nights were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three groups achieved the recommended mean TIR > 70%, mean TBR < 4%, and mean CV < 36% with a similar insulin requirement (Minimed 780G system: TIR 73.9 ± 11.2%, TBR 0.9 ± 1.2%, CV 29 ± 6.7%; Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ system: TIR 74.1 ± 11.1%, TBR 1.1 ± 1.0%, CV 34.5 ± 6.6%; DBLG1 System TIR 71.7 ± 11.3%, TBR 1.4 ± 3.7%, CV 32.4 ± 7.1%). Tight TIR% (70-140 mg/dl) was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ group (51.5 ± 9.8%) when compared to Minimed 780G group (42.1 ± 13.7%) and DBLG1 System (40.1 ± 10.5%). In all three groups the insulin infusion similarly decreased from midnight to 05.00 am and then increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All the three AHCL systems achieved the recommended TIR, TBR and CV without difference in insulin requirement. The Tandem Control-IQ system obtained a higher tight TIR.</p>","PeriodicalId":6921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Diabetologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the night-time effectiveness in achieving glycemic targets in adults with type 1 diabetes of three advanced hybryd closed-loop systems.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolò Diego Borella, Antonio Ferramosca, Giona Castagna, Silvia Ippolito, Sara Ceresoli, Antonio Taverna, Beatrice Sonzogni, Roberto Trevisan, Giuseppe Lepore\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00592-024-02397-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) systems currently represent the most advanced modality of insulin therapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the night-time (from 00 to 07 a.m.) effectiveness in achieving recommended glycemic targets of three different AHCL systems in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated 55 adults with T1D (mean age 41 ± 16 years, male 40%, diabetes duration 19.4 ± 11.4 years, BMI 24.1 ± 4.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) with similar glycemic control (GMI 7.0-7.4%). Twenty-two participants were using the Minimed 780G system, 18 the Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ system and 15 the DBLG1 system. Continuous glucose monitoring derived metrics and insulin requirement of 14 consecutive nights were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three groups achieved the recommended mean TIR > 70%, mean TBR < 4%, and mean CV < 36% with a similar insulin requirement (Minimed 780G system: TIR 73.9 ± 11.2%, TBR 0.9 ± 1.2%, CV 29 ± 6.7%; Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ system: TIR 74.1 ± 11.1%, TBR 1.1 ± 1.0%, CV 34.5 ± 6.6%; DBLG1 System TIR 71.7 ± 11.3%, TBR 1.4 ± 3.7%, CV 32.4 ± 7.1%). Tight TIR% (70-140 mg/dl) was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ group (51.5 ± 9.8%) when compared to Minimed 780G group (42.1 ± 13.7%) and DBLG1 System (40.1 ± 10.5%). In all three groups the insulin infusion similarly decreased from midnight to 05.00 am and then increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All the three AHCL systems achieved the recommended TIR, TBR and CV without difference in insulin requirement. The Tandem Control-IQ system obtained a higher tight TIR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Diabetologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Diabetologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-024-02397-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Diabetologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-024-02397-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:比较三种不同的 AHCL 系统在 1 型糖尿病(T1D)成人患者中实现推荐血糖目标的夜间(凌晨 0 时至上午 7 时)有效性:我们对 55 名血糖控制类似(GMI 7.0-7.4%)的成人 1 型糖尿病患者(平均年龄 41 ± 16 岁,男性占 40%,糖尿病病程 19.4 ± 11.4 年,体重指数 24.1 ± 4.1 kg/m2)进行了回顾性评估。其中 22 人使用 Minimed 780G 系统,18 人使用 Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ 系统,15 人使用 DBLG1 系统。对连续 14 个晚上的连续血糖监测得出的指标和胰岛素需求量进行了分析:结果:所有三组都达到了推荐的平均 TIR > 70% 和平均 TBR 结论:三种 AHCL 系统都达到了推荐的 TIR、TBR 和 CV 值,但胰岛素需求量没有差异。Tandem Control-IQ 系统的 TIR 值更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the night-time effectiveness in achieving glycemic targets in adults with type 1 diabetes of three advanced hybryd closed-loop systems.

Context: Advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) systems currently represent the most advanced modality of insulin therapy.

Aim: To compare the night-time (from 00 to 07 a.m.) effectiveness in achieving recommended glycemic targets of three different AHCL systems in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 55 adults with T1D (mean age 41 ± 16 years, male 40%, diabetes duration 19.4 ± 11.4 years, BMI 24.1 ± 4.1 kg/m2) with similar glycemic control (GMI 7.0-7.4%). Twenty-two participants were using the Minimed 780G system, 18 the Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ system and 15 the DBLG1 system. Continuous glucose monitoring derived metrics and insulin requirement of 14 consecutive nights were analyzed.

Results: All three groups achieved the recommended mean TIR > 70%, mean TBR < 4%, and mean CV < 36% with a similar insulin requirement (Minimed 780G system: TIR 73.9 ± 11.2%, TBR 0.9 ± 1.2%, CV 29 ± 6.7%; Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ system: TIR 74.1 ± 11.1%, TBR 1.1 ± 1.0%, CV 34.5 ± 6.6%; DBLG1 System TIR 71.7 ± 11.3%, TBR 1.4 ± 3.7%, CV 32.4 ± 7.1%). Tight TIR% (70-140 mg/dl) was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ group (51.5 ± 9.8%) when compared to Minimed 780G group (42.1 ± 13.7%) and DBLG1 System (40.1 ± 10.5%). In all three groups the insulin infusion similarly decreased from midnight to 05.00 am and then increased.

Conclusions: All the three AHCL systems achieved the recommended TIR, TBR and CV without difference in insulin requirement. The Tandem Control-IQ system obtained a higher tight TIR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Diabetologica
Acta Diabetologica 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Acta Diabetologica is a journal that publishes reports of experimental and clinical research on diabetes mellitus and related metabolic diseases. Original contributions on biochemical, physiological, pathophysiological and clinical aspects of research on diabetes and metabolic diseases are welcome. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications and letters to the editor. Invited reviews and editorials are also published. A Methodology forum, which publishes contributions on methodological aspects of diabetes in vivo and in vitro, is also available. The Editor-in-chief will be pleased to consider articles describing new techniques (e.g., new transplantation methods, metabolic models), of innovative importance in the field of diabetes/metabolism. Finally, workshop reports are also welcome in Acta Diabetologica.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the night-time effectiveness in achieving glycemic targets in adults with type 1 diabetes of three advanced hybryd closed-loop systems. Microbiome analysis of serum extracellular vesicles in gestational diabetes patients. Microvascular disease and severe COVID-19 outcomes in UKBiobank participants with diabetes. Association of remnant cholesterol with progression and regression of prediabetes in middle-aged and older adults: a nationwide cohort study. Diabetes as a risk factor for invasive meningococcal disease. A meta-analysis of observational studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1