胆囊息肉治疗的社会指南比较。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116099
Lorena Garcia, Frances Dygean, Emily Bortree, Ryan Seifi, Brian Yu, Julie Ferris, Austin Reifel, Christina Snyder, Patrick Choi, Kathryn Chen
{"title":"胆囊息肉治疗的社会指南比较。","authors":"Lorena Garcia, Frances Dygean, Emily Bortree, Ryan Seifi, Brian Yu, Julie Ferris, Austin Reifel, Christina Snyder, Patrick Choi, Kathryn Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2021, European radiology and gastrointestinal societies updated their guidelines regarding the management of gallbladder polyps (GBP). In 2022, the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) also released their guidelines. We compared the two sets to determine the differences in management and outcomes for GBPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis from 2018 to 2023 of 118 patients referred for GBPs. Radiologists retrospectively reviewed patient ultrasounds (US) and assigned an SRU category. We applied both sets of guidelines to identify next recommended step and performed a cost analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When applying European versus SRU guidelines, 52.5 ​% (n ​= ​62) versus 16.9 ​% (n ​= ​20) would have undergone immediate surgery (p ​< ​0.0001). US would have been considered a reasonable next step in 28.8 ​% (n ​= ​34) vs 42.4 ​% (n ​= ​50) (p ​= ​0.03). Adherence to SRU guidelines would have resulted in $1837 less spent per person (p ​< ​0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings found that adherence to SRU guidelines leads to less surgeries and follow up compared to European guidelines without causing harm. Further studies should be done to validate these findings and support standardized reporting of GBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"240 ","pages":"116099"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of society guidelines in the management of gallbladder polyps.\",\"authors\":\"Lorena Garcia, Frances Dygean, Emily Bortree, Ryan Seifi, Brian Yu, Julie Ferris, Austin Reifel, Christina Snyder, Patrick Choi, Kathryn Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2021, European radiology and gastrointestinal societies updated their guidelines regarding the management of gallbladder polyps (GBP). In 2022, the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) also released their guidelines. We compared the two sets to determine the differences in management and outcomes for GBPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis from 2018 to 2023 of 118 patients referred for GBPs. Radiologists retrospectively reviewed patient ultrasounds (US) and assigned an SRU category. We applied both sets of guidelines to identify next recommended step and performed a cost analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When applying European versus SRU guidelines, 52.5 ​% (n ​= ​62) versus 16.9 ​% (n ​= ​20) would have undergone immediate surgery (p ​< ​0.0001). US would have been considered a reasonable next step in 28.8 ​% (n ​= ​34) vs 42.4 ​% (n ​= ​50) (p ​= ​0.03). Adherence to SRU guidelines would have resulted in $1837 less spent per person (p ​< ​0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings found that adherence to SRU guidelines leads to less surgeries and follow up compared to European guidelines without causing harm. Further studies should be done to validate these findings and support standardized reporting of GBP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"240 \",\"pages\":\"116099\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116099\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2021 年,欧洲放射学会和胃肠学会更新了有关胆囊息肉 (GBP) 治疗的指南。2022 年,超声放射医师协会(SRU)也发布了他们的指南。我们对这两套指南进行了比较,以确定 GBP 在管理和结果方面的差异:我们对 2018 年至 2023 年转诊的 118 例 GBP 患者进行了回顾性分析。放射科医生对患者的超声检查(US)进行了回顾性审查,并分配了 SRU 类别。我们应用两套指南来确定下一步建议步骤,并进行了成本分析:结果:当采用欧洲指南和 SRU 指南时,52.5%(n = 62)和 16.9%(n = 20)的患者会立即接受手术(p 结论:我们的研究结果表明,SRU 和欧洲指南都能为患者提供更好的治疗方案:我们的研究结果表明,与欧洲指南相比,遵循 SRU 指南可减少手术和随访次数,且不会造成伤害。应开展进一步的研究来验证这些发现,并支持对 GBP 进行标准化报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of society guidelines in the management of gallbladder polyps.

Background: In 2021, European radiology and gastrointestinal societies updated their guidelines regarding the management of gallbladder polyps (GBP). In 2022, the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) also released their guidelines. We compared the two sets to determine the differences in management and outcomes for GBPs.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis from 2018 to 2023 of 118 patients referred for GBPs. Radiologists retrospectively reviewed patient ultrasounds (US) and assigned an SRU category. We applied both sets of guidelines to identify next recommended step and performed a cost analysis.

Results: When applying European versus SRU guidelines, 52.5 ​% (n ​= ​62) versus 16.9 ​% (n ​= ​20) would have undergone immediate surgery (p ​< ​0.0001). US would have been considered a reasonable next step in 28.8 ​% (n ​= ​34) vs 42.4 ​% (n ​= ​50) (p ​= ​0.03). Adherence to SRU guidelines would have resulted in $1837 less spent per person (p ​< ​0.001).

Conclusion: Our findings found that adherence to SRU guidelines leads to less surgeries and follow up compared to European guidelines without causing harm. Further studies should be done to validate these findings and support standardized reporting of GBP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
The multidisciplinary Landscape of gender affirmation surgical training. Are there any benefits to hospital consolidation? Global health experience among general surgery residents': Experiences, attitudes, and barriers. An organized approach to attract a diverse pool of applicants within a surgery residency program. Cricopharyngomyotomy: Outcomes of flexible endoscopic management of small and medium sized Zenker's diverticulum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1