混合性听力损失患者经皮骨传导植入体的疗效。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY American Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104513
Ghazal S Daher, Emily S Thompson, Meredith Thomason, George B Sankar, Cynthia A Hogan, Matthew L Carlson
{"title":"混合性听力损失患者经皮骨传导植入体的疗效。","authors":"Ghazal S Daher, Emily S Thompson, Meredith Thomason, George B Sankar, Cynthia A Hogan, Matthew L Carlson","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate audiological outcomes of transcutaneous devices among individuals with mixed hearing loss (MHL) who underwent implantation with the Cochlear™ Osia® and Med-El Bonebridge™ devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with MHL in at least one ear, including a best bone conduction (BBC) threshold of 30 dB HL or poorer, and air-bone gaps of 15 dB HL or more at one or more frequencies were implanted with the Cochlear™ Osia® or Med-El Bonebridge™ devices for MHL. Four-frequency pure tone average (PTA) was calculated for aided thresholds and compared to preoperative PTAs for BBC thresholds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the study participants, 11 were implanted with Osia, and 11 were implanted with Bonebridge. In the Osia group, the BBC PTA averaged 23.6 dB, which was not significantly different from the aided PTA of 27.0 dB (P = 0.2). In the Bonebridge group, the BBC PTA averaged 23.3 dB while the aided PTA was significantly poorer at 32.9 dB (P = 0.03). In both groups, aided sound field thresholds were worse than BBC thresholds overall except for a 7 dB improvement at 2000 Hz in the Osia group (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We highlight important limitations of current transcutaneous bone conduction systems for rehabilitation of MHL. Sound field outcomes for Osia and Bonebridge devices are limited by the BBC thresholds of either ear; these devices do not provide significant gain or \"overclosure\" beyond BBC thresholds. While both groups generally experienced declines in aided thresholds compared to best conduction thresholds, the Osia implant exhibited an exception of a 7 dB improvement at 2000 Hz.</p>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":"104513"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes with transcutaneous bone conduction implants in patients with mixed hearing loss.\",\"authors\":\"Ghazal S Daher, Emily S Thompson, Meredith Thomason, George B Sankar, Cynthia A Hogan, Matthew L Carlson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate audiological outcomes of transcutaneous devices among individuals with mixed hearing loss (MHL) who underwent implantation with the Cochlear™ Osia® and Med-El Bonebridge™ devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with MHL in at least one ear, including a best bone conduction (BBC) threshold of 30 dB HL or poorer, and air-bone gaps of 15 dB HL or more at one or more frequencies were implanted with the Cochlear™ Osia® or Med-El Bonebridge™ devices for MHL. Four-frequency pure tone average (PTA) was calculated for aided thresholds and compared to preoperative PTAs for BBC thresholds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the study participants, 11 were implanted with Osia, and 11 were implanted with Bonebridge. In the Osia group, the BBC PTA averaged 23.6 dB, which was not significantly different from the aided PTA of 27.0 dB (P = 0.2). In the Bonebridge group, the BBC PTA averaged 23.3 dB while the aided PTA was significantly poorer at 32.9 dB (P = 0.03). In both groups, aided sound field thresholds were worse than BBC thresholds overall except for a 7 dB improvement at 2000 Hz in the Osia group (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We highlight important limitations of current transcutaneous bone conduction systems for rehabilitation of MHL. Sound field outcomes for Osia and Bonebridge devices are limited by the BBC thresholds of either ear; these devices do not provide significant gain or \\\"overclosure\\\" beyond BBC thresholds. While both groups generally experienced declines in aided thresholds compared to best conduction thresholds, the Osia implant exhibited an exception of a 7 dB improvement at 2000 Hz.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104513\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估经皮设备对混合性听力损失(MHL)患者的听力效果:评估科利耳™ Osia® 和 Med-El Bonebridge™ 经皮设备对混合性听力损失(MHL)患者的听力效果:成年患者至少有一只耳朵患有 MHL,包括最佳骨传导(BBC)阈值为 30 dB HL 或更低,且在一个或多个频率上的气骨间隙为 15 dB HL 或更高,他们都植入了科利耳™ Osia® 或 Med-El Bonebridge™ 设备来治疗 MHL。计算了辅助阈值的四频纯音平均值(PTA),并与 BBC 阈值的术前 PTA 进行了比较:研究参与者中,11 人植入了 Osia,11 人植入了 Bonebridge。在 Osia 组,BBC PTA 平均值为 23.6 dB,与辅助 PTA 27.0 dB 相比差异不大(P = 0.2)。在 Bonebridge 组,BBC PTA 平均为 23.3 分贝,而辅助 PTA 则明显较差,为 32.9 分贝(P = 0.03)。在这两组中,除了 Osia 组在 2000 Hz 时提高了 7 dB 之外,辅助声场阈值总体上都比 BBC 的阈值差(P 结论:Bonebridge 和 Osia 组的辅助声场阈值都比 BBC 的阈值差):我们强调了目前经皮骨传导系统在多发性硬化症康复方面的重要局限性。Osia 和 Bonebridge 设备的声场效果受限于任一耳朵的 BBC 阈值;这些设备不能在 BBC 阈值之外提供显著的增益或 "过度封闭"。虽然与最佳传导阈值相比,两组患者的辅助阈值都普遍下降,但 Osia 植入体在 2000 Hz 时的改善幅度达到了 7 dB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes with transcutaneous bone conduction implants in patients with mixed hearing loss.

Objective: To evaluate audiological outcomes of transcutaneous devices among individuals with mixed hearing loss (MHL) who underwent implantation with the Cochlear™ Osia® and Med-El Bonebridge™ devices.

Methods: Adults with MHL in at least one ear, including a best bone conduction (BBC) threshold of 30 dB HL or poorer, and air-bone gaps of 15 dB HL or more at one or more frequencies were implanted with the Cochlear™ Osia® or Med-El Bonebridge™ devices for MHL. Four-frequency pure tone average (PTA) was calculated for aided thresholds and compared to preoperative PTAs for BBC thresholds.

Results: Among the study participants, 11 were implanted with Osia, and 11 were implanted with Bonebridge. In the Osia group, the BBC PTA averaged 23.6 dB, which was not significantly different from the aided PTA of 27.0 dB (P = 0.2). In the Bonebridge group, the BBC PTA averaged 23.3 dB while the aided PTA was significantly poorer at 32.9 dB (P = 0.03). In both groups, aided sound field thresholds were worse than BBC thresholds overall except for a 7 dB improvement at 2000 Hz in the Osia group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: We highlight important limitations of current transcutaneous bone conduction systems for rehabilitation of MHL. Sound field outcomes for Osia and Bonebridge devices are limited by the BBC thresholds of either ear; these devices do not provide significant gain or "overclosure" beyond BBC thresholds. While both groups generally experienced declines in aided thresholds compared to best conduction thresholds, the Osia implant exhibited an exception of a 7 dB improvement at 2000 Hz.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting the closed stapler laryngectomy: Technique and review of recent evidence. Unmet educational needs and expectations among tracheostomy recipients. Outcomes with transcutaneous bone conduction implants in patients with mixed hearing loss. Technique and outcomes of endoscopic supraglottic laryngectomy type IIIa using CO2 laser. Postoperative management of pediatric patients undergoing single-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction in the United States: A survey of ASPO members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1