在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用精神药物治疗痴呆症的行为和心理症状:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05563-4
Jung Min Yoon, Eunjin Kim, Alison M Trinkoff
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用精神药物治疗痴呆症的行为和心理症状:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jung Min Yoon, Eunjin Kim, Alison M Trinkoff","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05563-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the provision of quality care for behavioral and psychological symptoms in older adults with dementia may have been impeded due to physical distancing and infection control measures. Of particular concern is whether psychotropic medication use has increased despite its limited efficacy and adverse effects. This systematic review described the trajectory of psychotropic use for older adults with dementia across various settings, from community living to healthcare settings during the pandemic. Also, psychotropic use was explored in relation to patients, caregivers, and environment-related factors along with the occurrence of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search across five databases: Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled risk ratios (RRs) of psychotropic use in older adults with dementia, comparing the pandemic period to the pre-pandemic period. Subgroup analyses based on the class of psychotropics and sensitivity analyses also were conducted. A funnel plot and Egger's regression test were used to detect potential publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3,123 screened articles, 15 studies were included in this systematic review, with 10 of them being part of the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis yielded an RR of 1.16 (95% CI = 1.05-1.26) for overall psychotropic medication use. Further subgroup analysis based on the type of psychotropic medication revealed a significantly greater prevalence in the use of antipsychotics (RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.08-1.30). However, no significant differences were observed in the use of anxiolytics and/or hypnotics (including benzodiazepines), antidepressants, and mood stabilizers. Among psychotropics, some studies on antipsychotic use additionally explored patients, caregivers, and environmental-related factors during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review indicates a higher risk of psychotropic use, especially antipsychotics, during the pandemic. Nonetheless, underlying reasons for the increased psychotropic use are not fully available from the reviewed studies. Therefore, further research is needed to identify the factors driving psychotropic use during the pandemic and facilitate the development of quality improvement interventions that can be implemented to minimize inappropriate psychotropic prescribing in future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"24 1","pages":"967"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychotropic use for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jung Min Yoon, Eunjin Kim, Alison M Trinkoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12877-024-05563-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the provision of quality care for behavioral and psychological symptoms in older adults with dementia may have been impeded due to physical distancing and infection control measures. Of particular concern is whether psychotropic medication use has increased despite its limited efficacy and adverse effects. This systematic review described the trajectory of psychotropic use for older adults with dementia across various settings, from community living to healthcare settings during the pandemic. Also, psychotropic use was explored in relation to patients, caregivers, and environment-related factors along with the occurrence of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search across five databases: Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled risk ratios (RRs) of psychotropic use in older adults with dementia, comparing the pandemic period to the pre-pandemic period. Subgroup analyses based on the class of psychotropics and sensitivity analyses also were conducted. A funnel plot and Egger's regression test were used to detect potential publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3,123 screened articles, 15 studies were included in this systematic review, with 10 of them being part of the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis yielded an RR of 1.16 (95% CI = 1.05-1.26) for overall psychotropic medication use. Further subgroup analysis based on the type of psychotropic medication revealed a significantly greater prevalence in the use of antipsychotics (RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.08-1.30). However, no significant differences were observed in the use of anxiolytics and/or hypnotics (including benzodiazepines), antidepressants, and mood stabilizers. Among psychotropics, some studies on antipsychotic use additionally explored patients, caregivers, and environmental-related factors during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review indicates a higher risk of psychotropic use, especially antipsychotics, during the pandemic. Nonetheless, underlying reasons for the increased psychotropic use are not fully available from the reviewed studies. Therefore, further research is needed to identify the factors driving psychotropic use during the pandemic and facilitate the development of quality improvement interventions that can be implemented to minimize inappropriate psychotropic prescribing in future pandemics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"967\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580495/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05563-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05563-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,由于物理距离和感染控制措施的原因,为老年痴呆症患者的行为和心理症状提供优质护理的工作可能受到了阻碍。尤其值得关注的是,尽管精神药物的疗效有限且存在不良反应,但其使用量是否有所增加。这篇系统性综述描述了在大流行期间,从社区生活到医疗机构等不同环境中患有痴呆症的老年人使用精神药物的轨迹。此外,还探讨了精神药物的使用与患者、护理人员和环境相关因素以及大流行发生的关系:我们对五个数据库进行了全面检索:方法:我们对五个数据库进行了全面检索:Embase、PubMed、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和 Cochrane Library。我们使用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的批判性评估工具对研究方法的质量进行了评估。采用随机效应模型来估算患有痴呆症的老年人使用精神药物的总风险比(RRs),并将大流行期间与大流行前进行比较。此外还进行了基于精神药物类别的亚组分析和敏感性分析。采用漏斗图和 Egger 回归检验来检测潜在的发表偏倚:在筛选出的 3 123 篇文章中,有 15 项研究被纳入了本系统综述,其中 10 项研究被纳入了荟萃分析。我们的荟萃分析结果显示,总体精神药物使用的RR为1.16(95% CI = 1.05-1.26)。基于精神药物类型的进一步亚组分析显示,抗精神病药物的使用率明显更高(RR = 1.19,95% CI = 1.08-1.30)。然而,在抗焦虑药和/或催眠药(包括苯二氮卓)、抗抑郁药和情绪稳定剂的使用方面未观察到明显差异。在精神药物中,一些关于抗精神病药物使用的研究还探讨了大流行期间患者、护理人员和环境相关因素:综述表明,大流行期间使用精神药物,尤其是抗精神病药物的风险较高。尽管如此,精神药物使用增加的根本原因并不能从综述研究中完全找到。因此,有必要开展进一步研究,以确定大流行期间精神药物使用的驱动因素,并促进质量改进干预措施的发展,以便在未来的大流行中最大限度地减少不适当的精神药物处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychotropic use for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the provision of quality care for behavioral and psychological symptoms in older adults with dementia may have been impeded due to physical distancing and infection control measures. Of particular concern is whether psychotropic medication use has increased despite its limited efficacy and adverse effects. This systematic review described the trajectory of psychotropic use for older adults with dementia across various settings, from community living to healthcare settings during the pandemic. Also, psychotropic use was explored in relation to patients, caregivers, and environment-related factors along with the occurrence of the pandemic.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search across five databases: Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled risk ratios (RRs) of psychotropic use in older adults with dementia, comparing the pandemic period to the pre-pandemic period. Subgroup analyses based on the class of psychotropics and sensitivity analyses also were conducted. A funnel plot and Egger's regression test were used to detect potential publication bias.

Results: Of the 3,123 screened articles, 15 studies were included in this systematic review, with 10 of them being part of the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis yielded an RR of 1.16 (95% CI = 1.05-1.26) for overall psychotropic medication use. Further subgroup analysis based on the type of psychotropic medication revealed a significantly greater prevalence in the use of antipsychotics (RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.08-1.30). However, no significant differences were observed in the use of anxiolytics and/or hypnotics (including benzodiazepines), antidepressants, and mood stabilizers. Among psychotropics, some studies on antipsychotic use additionally explored patients, caregivers, and environmental-related factors during the pandemic.

Conclusions: The review indicates a higher risk of psychotropic use, especially antipsychotics, during the pandemic. Nonetheless, underlying reasons for the increased psychotropic use are not fully available from the reviewed studies. Therefore, further research is needed to identify the factors driving psychotropic use during the pandemic and facilitate the development of quality improvement interventions that can be implemented to minimize inappropriate psychotropic prescribing in future pandemics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Quality of life and associated characteristics in long-term care residents with advanced dementia in Macao: a cross-sectional study. Home physical therapy versus telerehabilitation in improving motor function and quality of life in Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Psychotropic use for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Association of serum creatinine-cystatin C ratio with all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality in US adults: a nationwide cohort study. Correction: Development of a machine learning-based risk assessment model for loneliness among elderly Chinese: a cross-sectional study based on Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1