英格兰引入 "软性 "选择不同意制度前后公众对已故器官捐赠的态度、偏好和自我报告行为的亚群体差异:混合方法研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11821-3
Paul Boadu, Leah McLaughlin, Jane Noyes, Stephen O'Neill, Mustafa Al-Haboubi, Lorraine Williams, Jennifer Bostock, Nicholas Mays
{"title":"英格兰引入 \"软性 \"选择不同意制度前后公众对已故器官捐赠的态度、偏好和自我报告行为的亚群体差异:混合方法研究。","authors":"Paul Boadu, Leah McLaughlin, Jane Noyes, Stephen O'Neill, Mustafa Al-Haboubi, Lorraine Williams, Jennifer Bostock, Nicholas Mays","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11821-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the UK, over 7,000 people are on the waiting list for an organ transplant and there are inequalities in need, access and waiting time for organs, with notable differences between minority ethnic groups. In May 2020, England changed the law and introduced a 'soft' opt-out system of consent to organ donation with a view to increase consent rates. We aimed to learn more about the impact of the law change on attitudes and views likely to be relevant to consent to deceased organ donation between different population subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed-methods design involving latent class analysis of data from twelve repeated cross-sectional surveys undertaken from 2015 to 2021 (n = 19,011); analysis of the law change survey dataset collected quarterly from 2018 to 2022 (n = 45,439); and interviews with purposively selected members of the public (n = 30) with a focus on minority perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Support for the principle of deceased organ donation remained high and stable in the general population (80%) but was 20% lower among ethnic minorities. From 2018 to 2022, an average of 58% of the general population was aware of the law change; this was lower among minority ethnic groups (31%). We identified four population subgroups (supportive donors (24% of the population); unengaged donors (22%); uncommitted donors (46%); and unsupportive donors (9%)). Interview themes included the challenges of discussing organ donation decisions, balancing autonomy with respecting family relationships, targeted misinformation, frustrations at the lack of consensus between community leaders, limited understanding of what happens during the end-of-life care leading to organ donation, and how this aligns with cultural values and preferences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of the law change has not been associated to date with any change in public attitudes and preferences likely to influence consent overall or in minority ethnic groups in England. Uncommitted donors may benefit from encouragement to express their organ donation decision, and unengaged donors from attempts to address mis/information, confusion, and uncertainty. Interventions to raise the consent rate need to take account of the significant role of the family as well as wider community influences on attitudes, preferences and decision-making, particularly among certain minority (ethnic) groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1447"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subgroup differences in public attitudes, preferences and self-reported behaviour related to deceased organ donation before and after the introduction of the 'soft' opt-out consent system in England: mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Boadu, Leah McLaughlin, Jane Noyes, Stephen O'Neill, Mustafa Al-Haboubi, Lorraine Williams, Jennifer Bostock, Nicholas Mays\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-024-11821-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the UK, over 7,000 people are on the waiting list for an organ transplant and there are inequalities in need, access and waiting time for organs, with notable differences between minority ethnic groups. In May 2020, England changed the law and introduced a 'soft' opt-out system of consent to organ donation with a view to increase consent rates. We aimed to learn more about the impact of the law change on attitudes and views likely to be relevant to consent to deceased organ donation between different population subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed-methods design involving latent class analysis of data from twelve repeated cross-sectional surveys undertaken from 2015 to 2021 (n = 19,011); analysis of the law change survey dataset collected quarterly from 2018 to 2022 (n = 45,439); and interviews with purposively selected members of the public (n = 30) with a focus on minority perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Support for the principle of deceased organ donation remained high and stable in the general population (80%) but was 20% lower among ethnic minorities. From 2018 to 2022, an average of 58% of the general population was aware of the law change; this was lower among minority ethnic groups (31%). We identified four population subgroups (supportive donors (24% of the population); unengaged donors (22%); uncommitted donors (46%); and unsupportive donors (9%)). Interview themes included the challenges of discussing organ donation decisions, balancing autonomy with respecting family relationships, targeted misinformation, frustrations at the lack of consensus between community leaders, limited understanding of what happens during the end-of-life care leading to organ donation, and how this aligns with cultural values and preferences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of the law change has not been associated to date with any change in public attitudes and preferences likely to influence consent overall or in minority ethnic groups in England. Uncommitted donors may benefit from encouragement to express their organ donation decision, and unengaged donors from attempts to address mis/information, confusion, and uncertainty. Interventions to raise the consent rate need to take account of the significant role of the family as well as wider community influences on attitudes, preferences and decision-making, particularly among certain minority (ethnic) groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1447\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580530/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11821-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11821-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在英国,超过 7,000 人在等待器官移植,在器官需求、获取和等待时间方面存在不平等,少数族裔群体之间的差异尤为明显。2020 年 5 月,英格兰修改了法律,引入了器官捐赠同意的 "软 "选择退出制度,以期提高同意率。我们旨在进一步了解法律变更对不同人口亚群之间可能与同意死者器官捐献相关的态度和观点的影响:混合方法设计,包括对2015年至2021年期间进行的12次重复横截面调查(n = 19,011)的数据进行潜类分析;分析2018年至2022年期间每季度收集的法律变更调查数据集(n = 45,439);以及对特意挑选的公众(n = 30)进行访谈,重点关注少数群体的观点:在普通人群中,对已故器官捐赠原则的支持率仍然较高且稳定(80%),但在少数族裔中则低了 20%。从 2018 年到 2022 年,平均 58% 的普通人群了解法律变更;而在少数民族群体中,这一比例较低(31%)。我们确定了四个人口亚群(支持捐献者(占人口的 24%);未参与捐献者(22%);未承诺捐献者(46%);不支持捐献者(9%))。访谈主题包括讨论器官捐献决定所面临的挑战、平衡自主权与尊重家庭关系、有针对性的错误信息、对社区领袖之间缺乏共识感到沮丧、对导致器官捐献的临终关怀过程中发生的事情了解有限,以及这如何与文化价值观和偏好相一致:结论:迄今为止,法律改革的实施与公众态度和偏好的任何变化都没有关联,而这些变化可能会影响英格兰的整体同意情况或少数族裔群体的同意情况。鼓励未同意的捐献者表达其器官捐献决定可能会使他们受益,而试图解决错误/信息、困惑和不确定性可能会使未参与的捐献者受益。提高同意率的干预措施需要考虑到家庭的重要作用以及更广泛的社区对态度、偏好和决策的影响,特别是在某些少数民族(种族)群体中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Subgroup differences in public attitudes, preferences and self-reported behaviour related to deceased organ donation before and after the introduction of the 'soft' opt-out consent system in England: mixed-methods study.

Background: In the UK, over 7,000 people are on the waiting list for an organ transplant and there are inequalities in need, access and waiting time for organs, with notable differences between minority ethnic groups. In May 2020, England changed the law and introduced a 'soft' opt-out system of consent to organ donation with a view to increase consent rates. We aimed to learn more about the impact of the law change on attitudes and views likely to be relevant to consent to deceased organ donation between different population subgroups.

Methods: Mixed-methods design involving latent class analysis of data from twelve repeated cross-sectional surveys undertaken from 2015 to 2021 (n = 19,011); analysis of the law change survey dataset collected quarterly from 2018 to 2022 (n = 45,439); and interviews with purposively selected members of the public (n = 30) with a focus on minority perspectives.

Results: Support for the principle of deceased organ donation remained high and stable in the general population (80%) but was 20% lower among ethnic minorities. From 2018 to 2022, an average of 58% of the general population was aware of the law change; this was lower among minority ethnic groups (31%). We identified four population subgroups (supportive donors (24% of the population); unengaged donors (22%); uncommitted donors (46%); and unsupportive donors (9%)). Interview themes included the challenges of discussing organ donation decisions, balancing autonomy with respecting family relationships, targeted misinformation, frustrations at the lack of consensus between community leaders, limited understanding of what happens during the end-of-life care leading to organ donation, and how this aligns with cultural values and preferences.

Conclusion: Implementation of the law change has not been associated to date with any change in public attitudes and preferences likely to influence consent overall or in minority ethnic groups in England. Uncommitted donors may benefit from encouragement to express their organ donation decision, and unengaged donors from attempts to address mis/information, confusion, and uncertainty. Interventions to raise the consent rate need to take account of the significant role of the family as well as wider community influences on attitudes, preferences and decision-making, particularly among certain minority (ethnic) groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Patient satisfaction survey in a public hospital: Remera Rukoma District Hospital, Rwanda, 2023. The impact of reform of medical insurance payment method on medical service pricing-based on empirical analysis of matched medical finance comprehensive data. Implementation and sustainability of systems change for mental health promotion and substance misuse prevention: a qualitative study. Male partner involvement in delivery care service and associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Costs of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy compared to conventional radiotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer - a micro-costing study using Time-Driven Activity Based Costing (TDABC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1