{"title":"氟替卡松呼气给药系统治疗伴有鼻息肉的慢性鼻窦炎的疗效:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yun Jin Kang, Gulnaz Stybayeva, Se Hwan Hwang","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-09073-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We evaluated the effects of two doses (186 µg and 372 µg) of exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU) on chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyp as a novel sinonasal delivery system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 5 studies retrieved from PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to April 2024, focusing on subjective and objective scores, and adverse and beneficial effects (responder and complete responder rates, improvements in Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC] scores, and surgical indication rates before and after EDS-FLU use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 3 months, EDS-FLU significantly reduced polyp (mean difference [MD] - 1.1605; 95% confidence interval [CI] [- 1.3277; -0.9934], I<sup>2</sup> = 61.4%) and 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (MD - 20.7561; 95% CI [- 22.3473; -19.1648], I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%) scores compared to baseline. At 1 month, nasal congestion, facial pain, olfactory dysfunction, and rhinorrhea significantly improved compared to baseline. EDS-FLU significantly reduced the surgical indication rate (odds ratio 0.2594; 95% CI [0.1910; 0.3522], I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%) and improved patient satisfaction, with 63.34% of patients reporting significant improvement in PGIC scores after 3 months. However, adverse effects, including epistaxis, headache, nasal congestion, and nasopharyngitis, were reported, with incidence rates ranging from 4.46 to 8.99%. There were no significant differences in beneficial or adverse effects between high and low fluticasone doses, but the high dose was associated with a higher percentage of complete responders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both doses of EDS-FLU significantly improved subjective and objective outcomes of CRS patients with nasal polyps. However, epistaxis and nasal septal erosive or ulcerative lesions were also considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of the exhalation delivery system with fluticasone for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yun Jin Kang, Gulnaz Stybayeva, Se Hwan Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-024-09073-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We evaluated the effects of two doses (186 µg and 372 µg) of exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU) on chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyp as a novel sinonasal delivery system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 5 studies retrieved from PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to April 2024, focusing on subjective and objective scores, and adverse and beneficial effects (responder and complete responder rates, improvements in Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC] scores, and surgical indication rates before and after EDS-FLU use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 3 months, EDS-FLU significantly reduced polyp (mean difference [MD] - 1.1605; 95% confidence interval [CI] [- 1.3277; -0.9934], I<sup>2</sup> = 61.4%) and 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (MD - 20.7561; 95% CI [- 22.3473; -19.1648], I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%) scores compared to baseline. At 1 month, nasal congestion, facial pain, olfactory dysfunction, and rhinorrhea significantly improved compared to baseline. EDS-FLU significantly reduced the surgical indication rate (odds ratio 0.2594; 95% CI [0.1910; 0.3522], I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%) and improved patient satisfaction, with 63.34% of patients reporting significant improvement in PGIC scores after 3 months. However, adverse effects, including epistaxis, headache, nasal congestion, and nasopharyngitis, were reported, with incidence rates ranging from 4.46 to 8.99%. There were no significant differences in beneficial or adverse effects between high and low fluticasone doses, but the high dose was associated with a higher percentage of complete responders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both doses of EDS-FLU significantly improved subjective and objective outcomes of CRS patients with nasal polyps. However, epistaxis and nasal septal erosive or ulcerative lesions were also considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09073-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09073-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of the exhalation delivery system with fluticasone for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Purpose: We evaluated the effects of two doses (186 µg and 372 µg) of exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU) on chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyp as a novel sinonasal delivery system.
Methods: We analyzed 5 studies retrieved from PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to April 2024, focusing on subjective and objective scores, and adverse and beneficial effects (responder and complete responder rates, improvements in Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC] scores, and surgical indication rates before and after EDS-FLU use.
Results: Over 3 months, EDS-FLU significantly reduced polyp (mean difference [MD] - 1.1605; 95% confidence interval [CI] [- 1.3277; -0.9934], I2 = 61.4%) and 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (MD - 20.7561; 95% CI [- 22.3473; -19.1648], I2 = 0.0%) scores compared to baseline. At 1 month, nasal congestion, facial pain, olfactory dysfunction, and rhinorrhea significantly improved compared to baseline. EDS-FLU significantly reduced the surgical indication rate (odds ratio 0.2594; 95% CI [0.1910; 0.3522], I2 = 0.0%) and improved patient satisfaction, with 63.34% of patients reporting significant improvement in PGIC scores after 3 months. However, adverse effects, including epistaxis, headache, nasal congestion, and nasopharyngitis, were reported, with incidence rates ranging from 4.46 to 8.99%. There were no significant differences in beneficial or adverse effects between high and low fluticasone doses, but the high dose was associated with a higher percentage of complete responders.
Conclusion: Both doses of EDS-FLU significantly improved subjective and objective outcomes of CRS patients with nasal polyps. However, epistaxis and nasal septal erosive or ulcerative lesions were also considered.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of
European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board
Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery
"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.