各种载脂蛋白 E 基因型与 2 型糖尿病老年人对亚麻籽木酚素复合物的反应有关。

Q3 Medicine Endocrine regulations Pub Date : 2024-11-21 Print Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2478/enr-2024-0026
Douglas E Barre, Kazimiera A Mizier-Barre, Odette Griscti
{"title":"各种载脂蛋白 E 基因型与 2 型糖尿病老年人对亚麻籽木酚素复合物的反应有关。","authors":"Douglas E Barre, Kazimiera A Mizier-Barre, Odette Griscti","doi":"10.2478/enr-2024-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective.</b> The objective of the study was to determine if there would be statistically significant differences or trends among apolipoprotein E genotypes in the responsiveness of members of a cluster of seven measures in older persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) consuming flaxseed lignan complex (FLC). The cluster of seven are abdominal obesity, hypertension, platelet hyperaggregability, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia (decreased plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), and increased plasma levels of triglycerides), increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation and increased inflammation. All cluster members exacerbate T2DM. <b>Methods.</b> Sixteen patients with well-controlled T2DM participated in this double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study consisting of four visits. Apolipoprotein E genotyping was done at visit one. The cluster of seven, diet, exercise, smoking and medication use were assessed at each visit. <b>Results.</b> The 3/4 genotype showed a stronger downward trend in systolic blood pressure compared to the 3/3 genotype with no trend or significant difference in the 2/4 genotype. There was a downward trend in diastolic blood pressure in genotype 3/3 compared genotype 2/4, which showed no significant difference or trend. Only genotype 3/4 showed a significant drop in diastolic pressure compared to genotypes 2/4 and 3/3. HDLc only showed a downward trend in 3/4 relative to genotypes 2/4 and 3/3. LDL apolipoprotein B oxidation (LDL-Box) only showed an upward trend in 3/3 compared to genotypes 2/4 and 3/4. There were no other significant differences or trends by genotype in the cluster of seven. <b>Conclusions.</b> It appears that those with the 2/4 genotype may not benefit from FLC, those with 3/3 and 3/4 genotypes may benefit only in terms of systolic and diastolic pressures, those with the apo E 3/4 genotype should perhaps avoid FLC to manage HDLc, and those with the 3/3 genotype should perhaps avoid FLC to manage LDL apolipoprotein B oxidation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11650,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine regulations","volume":"58 1","pages":"220-224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Various apolipoprotein E genotypes relate to responsiveness to flaxseed lignan complex in older persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Douglas E Barre, Kazimiera A Mizier-Barre, Odette Griscti\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/enr-2024-0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective.</b> The objective of the study was to determine if there would be statistically significant differences or trends among apolipoprotein E genotypes in the responsiveness of members of a cluster of seven measures in older persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) consuming flaxseed lignan complex (FLC). The cluster of seven are abdominal obesity, hypertension, platelet hyperaggregability, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia (decreased plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), and increased plasma levels of triglycerides), increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation and increased inflammation. All cluster members exacerbate T2DM. <b>Methods.</b> Sixteen patients with well-controlled T2DM participated in this double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study consisting of four visits. Apolipoprotein E genotyping was done at visit one. The cluster of seven, diet, exercise, smoking and medication use were assessed at each visit. <b>Results.</b> The 3/4 genotype showed a stronger downward trend in systolic blood pressure compared to the 3/3 genotype with no trend or significant difference in the 2/4 genotype. There was a downward trend in diastolic blood pressure in genotype 3/3 compared genotype 2/4, which showed no significant difference or trend. Only genotype 3/4 showed a significant drop in diastolic pressure compared to genotypes 2/4 and 3/3. HDLc only showed a downward trend in 3/4 relative to genotypes 2/4 and 3/3. LDL apolipoprotein B oxidation (LDL-Box) only showed an upward trend in 3/3 compared to genotypes 2/4 and 3/4. There were no other significant differences or trends by genotype in the cluster of seven. <b>Conclusions.</b> It appears that those with the 2/4 genotype may not benefit from FLC, those with 3/3 and 3/4 genotypes may benefit only in terms of systolic and diastolic pressures, those with the apo E 3/4 genotype should perhaps avoid FLC to manage HDLc, and those with the 3/3 genotype should perhaps avoid FLC to manage LDL apolipoprotein B oxidation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine regulations\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"220-224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine regulations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/enr-2024-0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine regulations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/enr-2024-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的该研究的目的是确定在服用亚麻籽木酚素复合物(FLC)的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)老年人中,不同载脂蛋白 E 基因型的人对七项衡量指标中的一组指标的反应性是否存在统计学意义上的显著差异或趋势。这七项指标包括腹部肥胖、高血压、血小板过度聚集、高血糖、血脂异常(血浆中高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDLc)水平降低,血浆中甘油三酯水平升高)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)氧化增加和炎症加剧。所有集群成员都会加重 T2DM。研究方法16 名病情控制良好的 T2DM 患者参加了这项双盲随机、安慰剂对照交叉研究,共进行了四次访视。在第一次就诊时进行载脂蛋白 E 基因分型。在每次就诊时评估七组患者的饮食、运动、吸烟和用药情况。结果显示与 3/3 基因型相比,3/4 基因型的收缩压呈更强的下降趋势,而 2/4 基因型则没有下降趋势或显著差异。与 2/4 基因型相比,3/3 基因型的舒张压呈下降趋势,但无显著差异或趋势。与基因型 2/4 和 3/3 相比,只有基因型 3/4 的舒张压有明显下降。与基因型 2/4 和 3/3 相比,只有基因型 3/4 的高密度脂蛋白胆固醇呈下降趋势。与基因型 2/4 和 3/4 相比,只有 3/3 中的低密度脂蛋白 B 氧化(LDL-Box)呈上升趋势。在七个基因型组中,没有其他明显的差异或趋势。结论。看来,2/4基因型的人可能不会从FLC中获益,3/3和3/4基因型的人可能仅在收缩压和舒张压方面获益,载脂蛋白E 3/4基因型的人或许应避免使用FLC来管理高密度脂蛋白胆固醇,而3/3基因型的人或许应避免使用FLC来管理低密度脂蛋白B氧化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Various apolipoprotein E genotypes relate to responsiveness to flaxseed lignan complex in older persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Objective. The objective of the study was to determine if there would be statistically significant differences or trends among apolipoprotein E genotypes in the responsiveness of members of a cluster of seven measures in older persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) consuming flaxseed lignan complex (FLC). The cluster of seven are abdominal obesity, hypertension, platelet hyperaggregability, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia (decreased plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), and increased plasma levels of triglycerides), increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation and increased inflammation. All cluster members exacerbate T2DM. Methods. Sixteen patients with well-controlled T2DM participated in this double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study consisting of four visits. Apolipoprotein E genotyping was done at visit one. The cluster of seven, diet, exercise, smoking and medication use were assessed at each visit. Results. The 3/4 genotype showed a stronger downward trend in systolic blood pressure compared to the 3/3 genotype with no trend or significant difference in the 2/4 genotype. There was a downward trend in diastolic blood pressure in genotype 3/3 compared genotype 2/4, which showed no significant difference or trend. Only genotype 3/4 showed a significant drop in diastolic pressure compared to genotypes 2/4 and 3/3. HDLc only showed a downward trend in 3/4 relative to genotypes 2/4 and 3/3. LDL apolipoprotein B oxidation (LDL-Box) only showed an upward trend in 3/3 compared to genotypes 2/4 and 3/4. There were no other significant differences or trends by genotype in the cluster of seven. Conclusions. It appears that those with the 2/4 genotype may not benefit from FLC, those with 3/3 and 3/4 genotypes may benefit only in terms of systolic and diastolic pressures, those with the apo E 3/4 genotype should perhaps avoid FLC to manage HDLc, and those with the 3/3 genotype should perhaps avoid FLC to manage LDL apolipoprotein B oxidation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine regulations
Endocrine regulations Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Milder Form of Vici Syndrome Due to Novel Missense Variant in Epg5 Gene Affecting Splicing: A Case Report. Tributyltin chloride and triphenyltin chloride inhibit steroid hormone secretion by mouse Leydig cells TM3 and human adrenocortical cells H295R. Cardiac myocyte contractility, calcium dynamics, and morphology in Zucker diabetic fatty female and male rats - lacking data in this model of obesity and diabetes: A review. Beyond canonical GPCR: emerging roles of seven transmembrane proteins in metabolic control - insights from GPR180: A review. Tissue-specific steroid hormone-regulated secretion of proteins in Drosophila melanogaster salivary glands - molecular and genetic aspects: A review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1