人工智能在喉部病变中的应用:系统回顾与荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1007/s00405-024-09075-0
Alejandro R Marrero-Gonzalez, Tanner J Diemer, Shaun A Nguyen, Terence J M Camilon, Kirsten Meenan, Ashli O'Rourke
{"title":"人工智能在喉部病变中的应用:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Alejandro R Marrero-Gonzalez, Tanner J Diemer, Shaun A Nguyen, Terence J M Camilon, Kirsten Meenan, Ashli O'Rourke","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-09075-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted technologies, including endoscopy, voice analysis, and histopathology, for detecting and classifying laryngeal lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, etc. for studies utilizing voice analysis, histopathology for laryngeal lesions, or AI-assisted endoscopy. The results of diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were synthesized by a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 studies employing AI-assisted endoscopy, 2 studies for voice analysis, and 4 studies for histopathology were included in the meta-analysis. The combined sensitivity of AI-assisted endoscopy was 91% (95% CI 87-94%) for the classification of benign from malignant lesions and 91% (95% CI 90-93%) for lesion detection. The highest accuracy pooled in detecting lesions versus healthy tissue was the AI-aided endoscopy was 94% (95% CI 92-97%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For laryngeal lesions, AI-assisted endoscopy shows excellent diagnosis accuracy. But more sizable prospective trials are needed to confirm the practical clinical value.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of artificial intelligence in laryngeal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro R Marrero-Gonzalez, Tanner J Diemer, Shaun A Nguyen, Terence J M Camilon, Kirsten Meenan, Ashli O'Rourke\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-024-09075-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted technologies, including endoscopy, voice analysis, and histopathology, for detecting and classifying laryngeal lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, etc. for studies utilizing voice analysis, histopathology for laryngeal lesions, or AI-assisted endoscopy. The results of diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were synthesized by a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 studies employing AI-assisted endoscopy, 2 studies for voice analysis, and 4 studies for histopathology were included in the meta-analysis. The combined sensitivity of AI-assisted endoscopy was 91% (95% CI 87-94%) for the classification of benign from malignant lesions and 91% (95% CI 90-93%) for lesion detection. The highest accuracy pooled in detecting lesions versus healthy tissue was the AI-aided endoscopy was 94% (95% CI 92-97%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For laryngeal lesions, AI-assisted endoscopy shows excellent diagnosis accuracy. But more sizable prospective trials are needed to confirm the practical clinical value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09075-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09075-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估人工智能辅助技术(包括内窥镜检查、语音分析和组织病理学)在检测和分类喉部病变方面的诊断准确性:方法: 在PubMed、Embase等网站上对利用嗓音分析、喉部病变组织病理学或人工智能辅助内窥镜进行的研究进行了系统检索。通过荟萃分析综合了诊断准确性、敏感性和特异性的结果:荟萃分析共纳入了 12 项采用人工智能辅助内窥镜检查的研究、2 项语音分析研究和 4 项组织病理学研究。人工智能辅助内窥镜对良性与恶性病变分类的综合灵敏度为91%(95% CI 87-94%),对病变检测的综合灵敏度为91%(95% CI 90-93%)。人工智能辅助内窥镜检测病变与健康组织的综合准确率最高,为94%(95% CI 92-97%):结论:对于喉部病变,人工智能辅助内窥镜检查显示出极佳的诊断准确性。结论:对于喉部病变,人工智能辅助内窥镜检查显示出极佳的诊断准确性,但还需要更大规模的前瞻性试验来证实其实际临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of artificial intelligence in laryngeal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted technologies, including endoscopy, voice analysis, and histopathology, for detecting and classifying laryngeal lesions.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, etc. for studies utilizing voice analysis, histopathology for laryngeal lesions, or AI-assisted endoscopy. The results of diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were synthesized by a meta-analysis.

Results: 12 studies employing AI-assisted endoscopy, 2 studies for voice analysis, and 4 studies for histopathology were included in the meta-analysis. The combined sensitivity of AI-assisted endoscopy was 91% (95% CI 87-94%) for the classification of benign from malignant lesions and 91% (95% CI 90-93%) for lesion detection. The highest accuracy pooled in detecting lesions versus healthy tissue was the AI-aided endoscopy was 94% (95% CI 92-97%).

Conclusions: For laryngeal lesions, AI-assisted endoscopy shows excellent diagnosis accuracy. But more sizable prospective trials are needed to confirm the practical clinical value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Endoscopic ear surgery in the treatment of chronic otitis media with atelectasis. Correction: A novel olfactory sorting task. Cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of audiological outcomes. Efficacy and safety of middle turbinate surgery: a systematic review. Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss after COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1