医院管理实践与医疗质量之间有什么关系?全球证据系统回顾。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health policy and planning Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1093/heapol/czae112
Charlotte Ward, Elias Rejoice Maynard Phiri, Catherine Goodman, Alinane Linda Nyondo-Mipando, Monica Malata, Wanangwa Chimwaza Manda, Victor Mwapasa, Timothy Powell-Jackson
{"title":"医院管理实践与医疗质量之间有什么关系?全球证据系统回顾。","authors":"Charlotte Ward, Elias Rejoice Maynard Phiri, Catherine Goodman, Alinane Linda Nyondo-Mipando, Monica Malata, Wanangwa Chimwaza Manda, Victor Mwapasa, Timothy Powell-Jackson","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a widely held view that good management improves organisational performance. However, hospitals are complex organisations and the relationship between management practices and health service delivery is not straightforward. We conducted a global, systematic literature review of the quantitative evidence on the link between the adoption of management practices and quality of care in hospitals. We searched in PubMed, EMBASE, EconLit, Global Health and Web of Science on 16th October 2024, without language or country restrictions. We included empirical studies from January 1, 2000, onward, examining the quantitative association between hospital management practices and quality of care. Outcomes included structural quality (availability of resources such as drugs and equipment), clinical quality (adherence to guidelines), health outcomes and patient satisfaction or experience with care. In every study, each tested association was categorised as significantly positive (at the 5 percent level), null or significantly negative. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022301462). Of 11,731 articles, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria and had acceptable risk of bias. Studies were equally distributed between high-income and low- and middle-income countries, with 22 cross-sectional and three intervention studies. Of 111 associations, 55 (49.5%) were significantly positive, 1 (1%) was significantly negative, and 55 (49.5%) were null. Among associations tested, the majority were significantly positive for structural quality (79%), clinical quality (60%) and health outcomes (57%), while most associations between hospital management and patient satisfaction (80%) were null. The findings are mixed, with a similar proportion of positive and null associations between management practices and quality of care across studies. The evidence is limited by risk of bias introduced by non-randomised study designs. Evidence of positive associations in some settings warrants further investigation of the association through intervention studies or natural experiments. This could leverage methodological developments in quantitatively measuring management, highlighted by this review.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the relationship between hospital management practices and quality of care? A systematic review of the global evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Ward, Elias Rejoice Maynard Phiri, Catherine Goodman, Alinane Linda Nyondo-Mipando, Monica Malata, Wanangwa Chimwaza Manda, Victor Mwapasa, Timothy Powell-Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapol/czae112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a widely held view that good management improves organisational performance. However, hospitals are complex organisations and the relationship between management practices and health service delivery is not straightforward. We conducted a global, systematic literature review of the quantitative evidence on the link between the adoption of management practices and quality of care in hospitals. We searched in PubMed, EMBASE, EconLit, Global Health and Web of Science on 16th October 2024, without language or country restrictions. We included empirical studies from January 1, 2000, onward, examining the quantitative association between hospital management practices and quality of care. Outcomes included structural quality (availability of resources such as drugs and equipment), clinical quality (adherence to guidelines), health outcomes and patient satisfaction or experience with care. In every study, each tested association was categorised as significantly positive (at the 5 percent level), null or significantly negative. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022301462). Of 11,731 articles, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria and had acceptable risk of bias. Studies were equally distributed between high-income and low- and middle-income countries, with 22 cross-sectional and three intervention studies. Of 111 associations, 55 (49.5%) were significantly positive, 1 (1%) was significantly negative, and 55 (49.5%) were null. Among associations tested, the majority were significantly positive for structural quality (79%), clinical quality (60%) and health outcomes (57%), while most associations between hospital management and patient satisfaction (80%) were null. The findings are mixed, with a similar proportion of positive and null associations between management practices and quality of care across studies. The evidence is limited by risk of bias introduced by non-randomised study designs. Evidence of positive associations in some settings warrants further investigation of the association through intervention studies or natural experiments. This could leverage methodological developments in quantitatively measuring management, highlighted by this review.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health policy and planning\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health policy and planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czae112\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czae112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们普遍认为,良好的管理可以提高组织绩效。然而,医院是一个复杂的组织,管理实践与医疗服务之间的关系并不简单。我们对医院采用管理实践与医疗质量之间关系的定量证据进行了一次全球性、系统性的文献综述。我们于 2024 年 10 月 16 日在 PubMed、EMBASE、EconLit、Global Health 和 Web of Science 上进行了检索,没有语言或国家限制。我们纳入了 2000 年 1 月 1 日以后的实证研究,这些研究考察了医院管理实践与护理质量之间的定量联系。结果包括结构质量(药物和设备等资源的可用性)、临床质量(对指南的遵守情况)、健康结果和患者满意度或护理体验。在每项研究中,经检测的每种关联都被分为显著正相关(5% 水平)、无效关联或显著负相关。该研究已在 PROSPERO 注册(CRD42022301462)。在 11731 篇文章中,有 25 项研究符合纳入标准,偏倚风险可接受。这些研究在高收入国家和中低收入国家之间分布均衡,其中有 22 项横断面研究和 3 项干预研究。在 111 项关联中,55 项(49.5%)呈显著正相关,1 项(1%)呈显著负相关,55 项(49.5%)为空关联。在测试的关联中,大多数关联在结构质量(79%)、临床质量(60%)和健康结果(57%)方面呈显著正相关,而医院管理和患者满意度之间的关联(80%)则大多为空。研究结果好坏参半,各项研究中管理实践与医疗质量之间的正相关和负相关比例相似。由于非随机研究设计存在偏倚风险,因此证据有限。在某些情况下,有证据表明两者之间存在正相关关系,因此有必要通过干预研究或自然实验对两者之间的关系进行进一步调查。这可以利用本综述所强调的定量测量管理方法的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What is the relationship between hospital management practices and quality of care? A systematic review of the global evidence.

There is a widely held view that good management improves organisational performance. However, hospitals are complex organisations and the relationship between management practices and health service delivery is not straightforward. We conducted a global, systematic literature review of the quantitative evidence on the link between the adoption of management practices and quality of care in hospitals. We searched in PubMed, EMBASE, EconLit, Global Health and Web of Science on 16th October 2024, without language or country restrictions. We included empirical studies from January 1, 2000, onward, examining the quantitative association between hospital management practices and quality of care. Outcomes included structural quality (availability of resources such as drugs and equipment), clinical quality (adherence to guidelines), health outcomes and patient satisfaction or experience with care. In every study, each tested association was categorised as significantly positive (at the 5 percent level), null or significantly negative. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022301462). Of 11,731 articles, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria and had acceptable risk of bias. Studies were equally distributed between high-income and low- and middle-income countries, with 22 cross-sectional and three intervention studies. Of 111 associations, 55 (49.5%) were significantly positive, 1 (1%) was significantly negative, and 55 (49.5%) were null. Among associations tested, the majority were significantly positive for structural quality (79%), clinical quality (60%) and health outcomes (57%), while most associations between hospital management and patient satisfaction (80%) were null. The findings are mixed, with a similar proportion of positive and null associations between management practices and quality of care across studies. The evidence is limited by risk of bias introduced by non-randomised study designs. Evidence of positive associations in some settings warrants further investigation of the association through intervention studies or natural experiments. This could leverage methodological developments in quantitatively measuring management, highlighted by this review.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
期刊最新文献
Conceptualising maternal mental health in rural Ghana: A realist qualitative analysis. Learning Analysis of Health System Resilience. Managing medicines in decentralisation: discrepancies between national policies and local practices in primary healthcare settings in Indonesia. What is the relationship between hospital management practices and quality of care? A systematic review of the global evidence. Development partner influence on domestic health financing contributions in Senegal: a mixed methods case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1